Africa AI Governance Index 2026 · Country profile on AI governance

Country Profile on AI Governance: Tunisia

Tunisia scores 2.12 out of 4 on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026. It sits in the Developing tier and ranks 12 of 54 states.

Region
North Africa
Version
1.2 · 7 October 2026
Evidence reference date
30 June 2026
Overview

Tunisia at a glance

How to read this profile

Indicator evidence in this factsheet comes from desk research in October 2026. Fellows have not verified it and it did not inform the score.

The Index is diagnostic. It measures formal governance instruments, not capability. Composite differences under about 0.1 are not meaningful.

Country

Population (2024)
12.3 million
Region
North Africa
Regional economic communities
Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa, Arab Maghreb Union
Geography
Coastal, 5 international submarine cable systems in service

Governance status

  • National AI strategy S1.1

    Draftnot scored

  • Data protection law G2.2

    Enforced with DPAnot scored

  • AI regulatory body G2.5

    Not determinednot scored

  • Malabo Convention ratification G2.7

    Signednot scored

  • Kigali Declaration endorsement R7.2

    Endorsednot scored

Headline assessment

Tunisia scores 2.12 out of 4 on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026. It sits in the Developing tier and ranks 12 of 54 states. The eight pillar scores are fellow-assigned values from the Regional Summary. Indicators are not scored individually. The strongest pillar is Governance & Regulation (2.60). The weakest is Implementation & Impact (1.60). The North Africa mean is 1.57. The mean for all 54 states is 1.33.

Strongest pillar
Governance & Regulation2.60 / 4Developing
Weakest pillar
Implementation & Impact1.60 / 4Emerging

Indicators scored: Pillar level only (fellow-assigned)

Pillar scores

Pillar scores at a glance

Each pillar is scored from 0 to 4. Tunisia's eight pillar scores are fellow-assigned values; indicators are not scored individually.

Bar chart of Tunisia's eight pillar scores out of 4, compared with the North Africa mean and the mean of all 54 states. The same figures are listed beside each bar and in the table below.
  • Tunisia score
  • North Africa mean
  • All 54 states mean
  1. P1Strategy & Vision
    2.44Developing

    North Africa: 2.23
    All 54 states: 1.76

  2. P2Governance & Regulation
    2.60Developing

    North Africa: 1.56
    All 54 states: 1.32

  3. P3Infrastructure & Data
    1.90Emerging

    North Africa: 1.63
    All 54 states: 1.51

  4. P4Human Capital
    2.20Developing

    North Africa: 1.54
    All 54 states: 1.20

  5. P5Innovation & Ecosystem
    2.20Developing

    North Africa: 1.39
    All 54 states: 1.05

  6. P6Ethics & Inclusion
    2.00Developing

    North Africa: 1.33
    All 54 states: 1.26

  7. P7Regional Integration
    1.70Emerging

    North Africa: 1.47
    All 54 states: 1.55

  8. P8Implementation & Impact
    1.60Emerging

    North Africa: 1.05
    All 54 states: 0.78

  9. Composite (weighted)
    2.12Developing

    North Africa: 1.57
    All 54 states: 1.33

View the pillar scores as a table
Tunisia pillar scores on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026
PillarBasisWeightScore (0–4)MaturityNorth Africa meanAfrica mean
P1 Strategy & VisionFellow-assigned15%2.44Developing2.231.76
P2 Governance & RegulationFellow-assigned15%2.60Developing1.561.32
P3 Infrastructure & DataFellow-assigned15%1.90Emerging1.631.51
P4 Human CapitalFellow-assigned15%2.20Developing1.541.20
P5 Innovation & EcosystemFellow-assigned10%2.20Developing1.391.05
P6 Ethics & InclusionFellow-assigned10%2.00Developing1.331.26
P7 Regional IntegrationFellow-assigned10%1.70Emerging1.471.55
P8 Implementation & ImpactFellow-assigned10%1.60Emerging1.050.78
Composite (weighted)—100%2.12Developing1.571.33
Country report

What the scores say about Tunisia

Tunisia scores 2.12 out of 4 on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026, which places it in the Developing tier and ranks it 12 of 54. The eight pillar scores are fellow-assigned values from the Regional Summary, and indicators are not scored. Governance and Regulation is the strongest pillar at 2.60 and Implementation and Impact is the weakest at 1.60. The composite sits above the North Africa mean of 1.57 and the Africa mean of 1.33. Desk research in October 2026, unverified by fellows and not used for the scores, found a data protection regime dating from 2004, a replacement bill pending before Parliament, and a national AI strategy for 2026 to 2030 presented in outline without formal adoption.

P1Strategy & Vision2.44 / 4Developing

Strategy and Vision scores 2.44, in the Developing tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found evidence on three indicators. Communication Technologies Minister Sofiane Hemissi presented 'the main outlines' of a national AI strategy for 2026 to 2030 at a ministerial council, reported in August 2026, and no formal adoption was found (S1.1, S1.2). He also presented Tunisia's AI strategy at the WSIS ministerial meeting in Geneva in July 2026 (S1.3). An earlier AI plan signed by four ministries was reported in February 2022 (S1.2). Seven indicators are not determined. No budget, detailed calendar or performance indicators have been made public (S1.4, S1.8, S1.9), and no review mechanism was found (S1.10).

See the 10 indicators for Strategy & Vision

P2Governance & Regulation2.60 / 4Developing

Governance and Regulation scores 2.60, in the Developing tier, a fellow-assigned value and the highest of the eight. Desk research in October 2026 found that Organic Act No. 2004-63 established the data protection regime and its authority, the INPDP (G2.2). A draft organic bill, PLO 095/2025, was pending before Parliament; it would add controls on AI-driven profiling (G2.1). The African Union status list dated 2 February 2026 records Tunisia's signature of the Malabo Convention on 23 April 2019, with no ratification (G2.7). The research recorded a confirmed absence of extraterritorial provisions under the 2004 Act (G2.9). No explicit AI mandate for the INPDP and no dedicated AI governance body were located; both are not determined (G2.3, G2.5).

See the 10 indicators for Governance & Regulation

P3Infrastructure & Data1.90 / 4Emerging

Infrastructure and Data scores 1.90, in the Emerging tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found 5 data centre facilities listed in Data Center Map's directory (I3.1) and 2 cable landing points, Bizerte and Kelibia, carrying 5 international cable systems (I3.3). International bandwidth reached 1,210 Gb/s in 2022, a figure the research calls likely outdated (I3.4). Organic Law No. 2004-63 requires prior INPDP authorisation for transfers abroad (I3.8). The National Cybersecurity Agency awards N-Cloud and G-Cloud labels to Tunisian hosts under Decree-Law 2023-17 (I3.10). The research recorded a confirmed absence of any hyperscaler cloud region in Tunisia (I3.5). Data centre capacity, GPU or HPC access, localisation and surveillance spending are not determined (I3.2, I3.6, I3.7, I3.9).

See the 10 indicators for Infrastructure & Data

P4Human Capital2.20 / 4Developing

Human Capital scores 2.20, in the Developing tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found 930 AI scholarly publications with a Tunisian affiliation for 2024 (H4.4). The baccalauréat includes a dedicated computer science track that upper-secondary students can choose (H4.6). The public Al Khawarizmi computing centre trained 500 teachers and students on AI tools in summer 2025 (H4.7). Modern Standard Arabic and Tunisian Arabic are supported in the language tools checked (H4.10). Six indicators are not determined. A report cited by allAfrica says Tunisia trains about 1,400 AI specialists a year, but the research found no national count of university programmes (H4.3). No labour transition framework and no informal economy assessment were found (H4.8, H4.9).

See the 10 indicators for Human Capital

P5Innovation & Ecosystem2.20 / 4Developing

Innovation and Ecosystem scores 2.20, in the Developing tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found evidence on three indicators. The TechBehemoths directory lists 7 companies in Tunisia that provide AI services, which the research treats as a lower bound (N5.1). The standards body INNORPI is an observing member of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42, with no voting role; no ISO/IEC 42001 certification or national adoption was found (N5.7, N5.8). Seven indicators are not determined. The Central Bank of Tunisia has run a fintech sandbox since 2020, which is not AI-specific (N5.4). No AI investment figure, AI incubator count, AI safety evaluation facility, risk assessment framework or university-industry partnership was identified (N5.2, N5.3, N5.6, N5.9, N5.10).

See the 10 indicators for Innovation & Ecosystem

P6Ethics & Inclusion2.00 / 4Developing

Ethics and Inclusion scores 2.00, in the Developing tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 recorded a confirmed absence on four indicators: no impact assessment framework (E6.1), no bias audit requirement (E6.2), no transparency and explainability framework (E6.3) and no government consultation of civil society on AI (E6.8). It found evidence on two indicators. The INPDP is the complaint body under Organic Act 2004-63, which gives no right against automated decision-making (E6.4). The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and the ICT ministry held a national symposium in Tunis on 24 September 2025 (E6.7). Judicial remedy, an advisory body, African ethical references and youth participation are not determined (E6.5, E6.6, E6.9, E6.10).

See the 10 indicators for Ethics & Inclusion

P7Regional Integration1.70 / 4Emerging

Regional Integration scores 1.70, in the Emerging tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found Tunisia on the official signatory list of the Africa Declaration on Artificial Intelligence of 4 April 2025 (R7.2); no formal national process of alignment with the African Union Continental AI Strategy was found (R7.1). A judicial investigation opened in August 2024 into a campaign video described as AI-generated; the AI generation was not forensically verified (R7.6, R7.7). Six indicators are not determined. Tunisia is a member of AMU, COMESA and CEN-SAD, with no AI coordination activity found (R7.3). It is not on the list of national statements from the Global Dialogue on AI Governance of 6 and 7 July 2026 (R7.9).

See the 10 indicators for Regional Integration

P8Implementation & Impact1.60 / 4Emerging

Implementation and Impact scores 1.60, in the Emerging tier, a fellow-assigned value and the lowest of the eight. In the desk research of October 2026, none of the 10 indicators carries an 'Evidence found' label. The research recorded a confirmed absence on two: La Presse reported on 30 August 2026 that no formal AI rules exist in healthcare (M8.2), and that credit scoring and fraud detection are emerging without formal AI rules (M8.7). Eight indicators are not determined. No AI governance budget was reported; a national supercomputer costing 32 million dinars was installed at CCK in July 2026, which the research classes as compute infrastructure (M8.1). No government AI registry or monitoring report was found (M8.4, M8.5).

See the 10 indicators for Implementation & Impact

Indicator evidence

Evidence by pillar

Desk-research evidence for each indicator, with sources. Where an indicator is marked “Not determined”, the research could not establish a finding. The Index method excludes such indicators from scoring rather than scoring them as absent.

P1 · Weight 15% of composite

Strategy & Vision

2.44 / 4Developing

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. North Africa mean 2.23 · all 54 states mean 1.76.

10 indicators: 3 evidence found, 0 confirmed absence, 7 not determined.

  1. S1.1

    National AI strategy existence

    Evidence found

    Draft: Communication Technologies Minister Sofiane Hemissi presented 'the main outlines' of a national AI strategy for 2026-2030 at a ministerial council (reported Aug 2026). The government's 2026 programme aims to finalise the strategy's action plan and launch implementation. Analysts note no budget, calendar or indicators have been published, and no formal adoption was found.

    Sources lapresse.tn (opens in a new tab)kapitalis.com (opens in a new tab)leconomistemaghrebin.com (opens in a new tab)

  2. S1.2

    Strategy adoption date

    Evidence found

    N/A: No formal adoption found: outlines of the 2026-2030 strategy were presented at a ministerial council (Aug 2026 reporting). An earlier AI plan signed by four ministries was reported in Feb 2022.

    Sources lapresse.tn (opens in a new tab)leconomistemaghrebin.com (opens in a new tab)kapitalis.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. S1.3

    Political commitment signals

    Evidence found

    Formal statement: Minister Hemissi presented the strategy outlines at a ministerial council and presented Tunisia's AI strategy at the WSIS ministerial meeting in Geneva (Jul 2026).

    Sources lapresse.tn (opens in a new tab)webmanagercenter.com (opens in a new tab)

  4. S1.4

    Dedicated AI budget allocation

    Not determined

    No budget disclosed: 'no precise budget, detailed calendar, or performance indicators have been made public' (Aug 2026).

    Sources leconomistemaghrebin.com (opens in a new tab)

  5. S1.5

    AU Continental AI Strategy alignment

    Not determined

    No information on AU Continental AI Strategy alignment.

    Sources leconomistemaghrebin.com (opens in a new tab)webmanagercenter.com (opens in a new tab)

  6. S1.6

    Multi-stakeholder consultation

    Not determined

    No information on consultation for the 2026-2030 strategy. A civil-society white paper with 41 recommendations was published by ATUGE (Jul 2026) independently of government.

    Sources leconomistemaghrebin.com (opens in a new tab)

  7. S1.7

    Sector prioritisation

    Not determined

    Objectives stated (digital sovereignty, cybersecurity, export of digital solutions); no priority sectors found for the 2026-2030 strategy. The Feb 2022 four-ministry plan cited health, transport and education.

    Sources leconomistemaghrebin.com (opens in a new tab)kapitalis.com (opens in a new tab)

  8. S1.8

    Implementation roadmap

    Not determined

    No detailed calendar published (Aug 2026); the 2026 government programme plans to finalise the action plan.

    Sources leconomistemaghrebin.com (opens in a new tab)kapitalis.com (opens in a new tab)

  9. S1.9

    Monitoring and evaluation framework

    Not determined

    No performance indicators made public (Aug 2026).

    Sources leconomistemaghrebin.com (opens in a new tab)

  10. S1.10

    Strategy review mechanism

    Not determined

    No review mechanism found.

    Sources leconomistemaghrebin.com (opens in a new tab)

P2 · Weight 15% of composite

Governance & Regulation

2.60 / 4Developing

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. North Africa mean 1.56 · all 54 states mean 1.32.

10 indicators: 3 evidence found, 1 confirmed absence, 6 not determined.

  1. G2.1

    AI-specific legislation

    Evidence found

    Draft: A draft organic data protection bill (PLO 095/2025) before the Assemblee des Representants du Peuple would repeal Organic Law 2004-63 and add controls on AI-driven profiling (Global Law Experts, reviewed 13 August 2026). It is AI-relevant, not AI-specific; La Presse (30 August 2026) reports that the national AI strategy, announced repeatedly since 2018, has still not been officially published.

    Sources globallawexperts.com (opens in a new tab)lapresse.tn (opens in a new tab)

  2. G2.2

    Data protection law status

    Evidence found

    Enforced with DPA: Organic Act No. 2004-63 established Tunisia's data protection regime and its authority, the INPDP, with Decree No. 2007-3004 setting declaration and authorisation procedures. Controllers began regularly declaring processing to the INPDP only from 2015, and a replacement bill (PLO 095/2025) was pending before Parliament as of August 2026.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)globallawexperts.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. G2.3

    DPA AI mandate

    Not determined

    The INPDP exists under Organic Act 2004-63, but no explicit AI oversight mandate or AI guidance was located. The pending bill PLO 095/2025 would introduce controls on AI-driven profiling (August 2026).

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)globallawexperts.com (opens in a new tab)

  4. G2.4

    DPA staffing and budget

    Not determined

    Published DPA staff count and annual budget were not located in this desk review (October 2026). dataprotection.africa (May 2022) records 13 INPDP members with repeatedly renewable terms.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)

  5. G2.5

    AI regulatory body existence

    Not determined

    No dedicated AI governance body was located; La Presse (30 August 2026) notes the national AI strategy has not been officially published.

    Sources lapresse.tn (opens in a new tab)

  6. G2.6

    Institutional design model

    Not determined

    No regulatory model for AI is defined while the AI strategy is unpublished; the INPDP regulates personal data.

    Sources lapresse.tn (opens in a new tab)dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)

  7. G2.7

    Malabo Convention ratification

    Evidence found

    Signed: The AU official status list dated 02/02/2026 records for Tunisia: signature on 23/04/2019, with no ratification or deposit. The Convention entered into force on 8 June 2023.

    Sources au.int (opens in a new tab)au.int (2) (opens in a new tab)

  8. G2.8

    Enforcement actions taken

    Not determined

    No AI-related enforcement action (investigation, fine or order concerning AI or automated processing) was located in this desk review (October 2026); absence is not confirmed because DPA decision registers were not accessible.

  9. G2.9

    Extraterritorial provisions

    Confirmed absence

    None: dataprotection.africa (May 2022) records that Organic Act 2004-63 does not apply to foreign entities. The scope of the pending replacement bill PLO 095/2025 on this point was not verified.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)globallawexperts.com (opens in a new tab)

  10. G2.10

    IP framework for AI

    Not determined

    No evidence of a review of intellectual property legislation for AI-generated content was located in this desk review (October 2026); IP-specific searches could not be completed, so absence is not confirmed.

P3 · Weight 15% of composite

Infrastructure & Data

1.90 / 4Emerging

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. North Africa mean 1.63 · all 54 states mean 1.51.

10 indicators: 5 evidence found, 1 confirmed absence, 4 not determined.

  1. I3.1

    Data center count

    Evidence found

    Data Center Map's Africa directory (page undated; accessed 2026-10-06) lists 5 data centre facility(ies) in Tunisia, out of 261 listed across 43 African countries. The directory is self-reported by operators and may include some non-colocation facilities.

    Sources datacentermap.com (opens in a new tab)

  2. I3.2

    Data center capacity (MW)

    Not determined

    No dated, named source publishing total live data centre power capacity (MW) for Tunisia was found. Data Center Map's directory does not report MW, and the ResearchAndMarkets Africa portfolio (Mar 2025) does not disclose country breakdowns in its public release.

    Sources datacentermap.com (opens in a new tab)businesswire.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. I3.3

    Submarine cable landing points

    Evidence found

    TeleGeography Submarine Cable Map data (accessed 2026-10-06) lists 2 landing point(s) in Tunisia served by at least one in-service international cable (Bizerte, Kelibia), carrying 5 distinct international cable systems: Didon, Hannibal, Medusa, PEACE, SEA-ME-WE 4.

    Sources submarinecablemap.com (opens in a new tab)submarinecablemap.com (2) (opens in a new tab)submarinecablemap.com (3) (opens in a new tab)

  4. I3.4

    International bandwidth (Gbps)

    Evidence found

    African Manager (27 Jan 2023), reporting national ICT indicators, states Tunisia's international internet bandwidth capacity reached 1,210 Gb/s in 2022, up from 1,110 Gb/s in 2021. Operator-level context: TelecomTalk (23 Aug 2024) reports Tunisie Telecom alone upgraded its international capacity to 2.5 Tbps, so the 2022 national figure is likely outdated.

    Sources africanmanager.com (opens in a new tab)telecomtalk.info (opens in a new tab)

  5. I3.5

    Hyperscaler presence

    Confirmed absence

    None: Official region lists checked on 2026-10-06 show no cloud region, availability zone or local/edge zone in Tunisia: AWS (Africa region Cape Town only; local zones Johannesburg and Nairobi), Azure (South Africa North/West only), Google Cloud (africa-south1 Johannesburg only), Oracle (Johannesburg and Casablanca live; Kenya coming soon) and Alibaba (no African region). Huawei Cloud's African regions are Johannesburg and Cairo (May 2024), but this rests on press coverage because Huawei's own region page could not be machine-read.

    Sources aws.amazon.com (opens in a new tab)aws.amazon.com (2) (opens in a new tab)learn.microsoft.com (opens in a new tab)

  6. I3.6

    GPU/HPC access

    Not determined

    No source documenting GPU or HPC capacity for AI research in Tunisia was opened in this pass. No Tunisia system appears on the TOP500 list (June 2026).

    Sources top500.org (opens in a new tab)

  7. I3.7

    Data localisation provisions

    Not determined

    Organic Law 2004-63 requires INPDP authorisation for transfers, and CIPESA (Nov 2022) describes INPDP's 2017 enforcement against OVH Tunisie for unauthorised transfers abroad. No explicit in-country storage mandate was verified in this pass.

    Sources dlapiperdataprotection.com (opens in a new tab)cipesa.org (opens in a new tab)

  8. I3.8

    Cross-border data flow framework

    Evidence found

    Comprehensive: DLA Piper Data Protection Laws of the World (accessed 2026-10-06): Organic Law No. 2004-63 (Articles 47-52) requires prior INPDP authorisation and data-subject consent for transfers, bans transfers that endanger public security, and requires adequacy; INPDP Decision No. 3 of 5 Sept 2018 lists adequate countries.

    Sources dlapiperdataprotection.com (opens in a new tab)

  9. I3.9

    Foreign AI surveillance spending

    Not determined

    Tunisia is not among the 11 countries mapped in IDS/ADRN's Smart City Surveillance in Africa (March 2026), and no other dated source documenting a contract value for foreign AI-enabled surveillance in Tunisia was opened in this pass.

    Sources ids.ac.uk (opens in a new tab)

  10. I3.10

    Sovereign cloud initiatives

    Evidence found

    Operational: Under cybersecurity Decree-Law 2023-17 and a ministerial order of 13 Sep 2023, Tunisia's National Cybersecurity Agency (ANCS) awards N-Cloud and G-Cloud (government cloud) labels to Tunisian hosts as a sovereign cloud framework. Next Step IT received the first N-Cloud label (Apr 2024), and 3S and EO Data Center received G-Cloud labels on 11 Jul 2024 (Kapitalis, 13 Jul 2024).

    Sources kapitalis.com (opens in a new tab)lapresse.tn (opens in a new tab)

P4 · Weight 15% of composite

Human Capital

2.20 / 4Developing

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. North Africa mean 1.54 · all 54 states mean 1.20.

10 indicators: 4 evidence found, 0 confirmed absence, 6 not determined.

  1. H4.1

    AI researchers per million

    Not determined

    No consistent cross-country source of AI-specific researchers per million was found or could be queried for this country as of Oct 2026 (the planned OpenAlex author query was blocked by an API rate limit on 2026-10-06). Context only: UNESCO UIS via World Bank indicator SP.POP.SCIE.RD.P6 reports 1667.6 total R&D researchers (all fields, FTE) per million people in 2024; this is not an AI-specific figure.

    Sources api.worldbank.org (opens in a new tab)

  2. H4.2

    DPA staff with AI competency

    Not determined

    No published source was found on the number of data protection authority staff with demonstrable AI technical skills as of Oct 2026; DPA annual reports were not located within the research budget of this pass.

  3. H4.3

    University AI programs

    Not determined

    No national count found. allAfrica (21 Feb 2026), citing an IACE report of Nov 2025, says Tunisia trains about 1,400 AI specialists a year (800 graduates and 600 retrainees) and that a higher institute dedicated to AI (HIDE) opened at the University of Tunis in 2024. That is at least 1 university, but the full count is unknown.

    Sources fr.allafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

  4. H4.4

    African-authored AI publications

    Evidence found

    CSET Country Activity Tracker (Merged Academic Corpus) via Our World in Data, series 'AI scholarly publications - Field: All', entity Tunisia (TUN), reference year 2024: 930 publications (2023: 939). Counts articles with at least one author at an institution in the country, English title/abstract only; dataset last updated 27 Apr 2026. OpenAlex could not be used because the API was rate-limited on 2026-10-06.

    Data note: CSET/OWID AI publications 2022–24: 793, 939, 930.

    Sources ourworldindata.org (opens in a new tab)ourworldindata.org (2) (opens in a new tab)

  5. H4.5

    AI patents filed

    Not determined

    No country-level count of AI-related domestic patent filings was retrieved as of Oct 2026. WIPO IP Statistics and national IP office data were not accessible in this pass, and no published AI-patent figure for this country was found.

  6. H4.6

    K-12 CS education

    Evidence found

    Elective: The Tunisian baccalauréat has seven sections, including a dedicated 'Sciences de l'informatique' (computer science) track that upper-secondary students can choose (Wikipédia, revised Aug 2025, citing bacweb.tn). Whether informatics is compulsory in other tracks or grades was not verified, so this is a minimum status.

    Sources fr.wikipedia.org (opens in a new tab)

  7. H4.7

    AI workforce training programs

    Evidence found

    Pilot: The public Al Khawarizmi computing centre trained 500 teachers and students on AI tools in summer 2025 (allAfrica, 21 Feb 2026). An IACE report (Nov 2025) counts about 600 AI professional retrainings a year but does not attribute them to a government programme, and Tunisia had no national AI-in-education strategy at that date.

    Sources fr.allafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

  8. H4.8

    Labour transition policy

    Not determined

    No government framework on AI and labour-market transition (adopted, draft or under discussion) was found for this country in the sources opened in this pass (Oct 2026).

  9. H4.9

    Informal economy AI assessment

    Not determined

    No government assessment of AI's impact on the informal economy was found for this country in the sources opened in this pass (Oct 2026).

  10. H4.10

    African language NLP coverage

    Evidence found

    Count of domestic non-European languages in Meta NLLB-200/FLORES-200 or Google Translate (Cloud Translation list accessed Oct 2026; Jun 2024 expansion), mapped by the researcher. Supported: Modern Standard Arabic (NLLB arb_Arab; Google ar) and Tunisian Arabic (NLLB aeb_Arab).

    Sources raw.githubusercontent.com (opens in a new tab)cloud.google.com (opens in a new tab)blog.google (opens in a new tab)

P5 · Weight 10% of composite

Innovation & Ecosystem

2.20 / 4Developing

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. North Africa mean 1.39 · all 54 states mean 1.05.

10 indicators: 3 evidence found, 0 confirmed absence, 7 not determined.

  1. N5.1

    AI companies count

    Evidence found

    TechBehemoths directory (accessed Oct 2026, page undated) states 'There are 7 Companies in Tunisia that provide Artificial Intelligence Services'. Directory of self-listed IT service firms: a lower bound, not a census of AI startups.

    Sources techbehemoths.com (opens in a new tab)

  2. N5.2

    Private AI investment (USD)

    Not determined

    Partech's 2025 report (22 Jan 2026) states that outside the top four markets only Senegal, Morocco and Ghana exceeded US$50M in tech equity, so Tunisia received less than US$50M in 2025; no country figure and no AI-specific investment figure was found. Partech notes Tunisia recorded 5 female-led equity deals (about 38% of its equity deals) in 2025.

    Sources partechpartners.com (opens in a new tab)cdn-website.partechpartners.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. N5.3

    AI incubators/accelerators

    Not determined

    No AI-focused incubator or accelerator count established from an opened source in this pass (general tech hubs not counted).

  4. N5.4

    Regulatory sandbox (AI)

    Not determined

    The Central Bank of Tunisia has run a fintech regulatory sandbox since 2020 (used for wholesale CBDC tests); it is a fintech sandbox, NOT AI-specific. No AI-specific sandbox was identified; the Datasphere Initiative 2025 inventory found AI-specific sandboxes in Africa still nascent.

    Sources openbankproject.com (opens in a new tab)thefintechtimes.com (opens in a new tab)thedatasphere.org (opens in a new tab)

  5. N5.5

    Government AI procurement

    Not determined

    No evidence located on government procurement of AI from domestic developers (no AI-specific procurement rule or preference policy found in sources opened).

  6. N5.6

    AI safety evaluation capacity

    Not determined

    No AI safety testing or evaluation facility (academic, government or accredited) identified in sources opened.

  7. N5.7

    ISO/IEC 42001 adoption

    Evidence found

    Aware: Tunisia's standards body INNORPI is an observing (O) member of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 (list dated Oct 2026), the committee that developed ISO/IEC 42001, so the standard is known at standards-body level. No 42001 certification of an organisation in the country and no national adoption was found.

    Sources iso.org (opens in a new tab)

  8. N5.8

    Standards body AI competency

    Evidence found

    AI working group: INNORPI is one of 24 observing (O) members of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 Artificial intelligence (list dated Oct 2026): it follows AI standardisation but has no voting role. No dedicated national AI technical committee was verified; mapping O-membership to 'AI working group' is a coder judgement.

    Sources iso.org (opens in a new tab)

  9. N5.9

    AI risk assessment frameworks

    Not determined

    No sector-specific or cross-sector AI risk assessment framework identified in sources opened.

  10. N5.10

    University-industry AI partnerships

    Not determined

    No formal university-industry AI research partnership identified in sources opened.

P6 · Weight 10% of composite

Ethics & Inclusion

2.00 / 4Developing

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. North Africa mean 1.33 · all 54 states mean 1.26.

10 indicators: 2 evidence found, 4 confirmed absence, 4 not determined.

  1. E6.1

    Algorithmic impact assessment

    Confirmed absence

    None: GIRAI 2026 records no impact-assessment framework for Tunisia (score 0) and DLA Piper (Feb 2026) lists no DPIA duty under Organic Act 2004-63; the 2026-2030 AI strategy has not been published. A pending data protection bill (PLO 095/2025) was not enacted as of Aug 2026.

    Sources global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)dlapiperdataprotection.com (opens in a new tab)globallawexperts.com (opens in a new tab)

  2. E6.2

    Bias audit requirements

    Confirmed absence

    None: GIRAI 2026 records no framework or initiative on fairness and non-discrimination for Tunisia (indicator score 0), and no AI-specific law requiring bias audits was found as of Oct 2026.

    Sources global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)

  3. E6.3

    Transparency obligations

    Confirmed absence

    None: GIRAI 2026 records no transparency and explainability framework for Tunisia (score 0); dataprotection.africa (May 2022) records no automated-decision right under Organic Act 2004-63, and controls on automated decisions exist only in a pending bill (Aug 2026).

    Sources global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)globallawexperts.com (opens in a new tab)

  4. E6.4

    Citizen redress mechanism

    Evidence found

    DPA complaint: dataprotection.africa (May 2022) records that Organic Act 2004-63 provides no right not to be subject to automated decision-making; the INPDP is the complaint body under that Act. A replacement bill (PLO 095/2025) with rights to contest automated decisions was before Parliament in Aug 2026 (Global Law Experts) but was not found enacted as of Oct 2026.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)globallawexperts.com (opens in a new tab)

  5. E6.5

    Judicial AI remedy

    Not determined

    No court case on algorithms, AI or solely automated decisions was found for Tunisia in sources opened as of Oct 2026 (data protection trackers, GIRAI 2026 access-to-redress indicator); ordinary courts have general jurisdiction, but the absence of precedent is not confirmed by an authoritative source.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)

  6. E6.6

    AI advisory body diversity

    Not determined

    No national AI advisory body for Tunisia was located in sources opened as of Oct 2026, so composition and diversity cannot be assessed; absence is not confirmed by an authoritative source.

    Sources global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)

  7. E6.7

    Global AI governance participation

    Evidence found

    Active member: UNESCO and the ICT ministry held a national symposium in Tunis on 24 Sep 2025 to accelerate implementation of the UNESCO Recommendation and set up national working groups to run the RAM readiness assessment. Tunisia is not on the Paris statement (Feb 2025), the initial New Delhi endorser list (Feb 2026) or the GPAI member list.

    Sources webmanagercenter.com (opens in a new tab)elysee.fr (opens in a new tab)digitalpolicyalert.org (opens in a new tab)

  8. E6.8

    Civil society AI engagement

    Confirmed absence

    None: GIRAI 2026 scores Tunisia 0 on government mechanisms for civil society inclusion in AI policy and governance and on its civil-society-engagement indicators. No formal or ad hoc civil society consultation by government on AI was found in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

    Sources global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)

  9. E6.9

    African ethical framework reference

    Not determined

    No reference to Ubuntu or African ethical principles was found in AI governance material for Tunisia opened as of Oct 2026; no adopted national AI document was searched in full, so absence is not confirmed.

    Sources global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)

  10. E6.10

    Youth participation

    Not determined

    No formal youth participation mechanism in AI governance was found for Tunisia in sources opened as of Oct 2026; absence is not confirmed.

    Sources global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)

P7 · Weight 10% of composite

Regional Integration

1.70 / 4Emerging

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. North Africa mean 1.47 · all 54 states mean 1.55.

10 indicators: 4 evidence found, 0 confirmed absence, 6 not determined.

  1. R7.1

    AU AI Strategy alignment

    Evidence found

    Awareness: Tunisia is a signatory of the Africa Declaration on AI (Kigali, 4 April 2025), which in clause 3.6.1 commits signatories to support national AI policies and governance frameworks aligned with the AU Continental AI Strategy; no country-specific formal alignment process was found in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

    Sources c4ir.rw (opens in a new tab)

  2. R7.2

    Kigali Declaration endorsement

    Evidence found

    Endorsed: Tunisia appears on the official signatory list of the Africa Declaration on Artificial Intelligence, done at Kigali on 4 April 2025 (C4IR Rwanda PDF created 5 April 2025; list of AU, Smart Africa and 52 states). No evidence of a national implementation step specifically citing the Declaration was found as of Oct 2026.

    Sources c4ir.rw (opens in a new tab)aiexpoafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. R7.3

    REC AI governance coordination

    Not determined

    Tunisia is a member of AMU (founding 1989), COMESA (2018) and CEN-SAD (2001). No REC-level AI governance coordination activity involving Tunisia was found in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

    Sources en.wikipedia.org (opens in a new tab)

  4. R7.4

    Cross-border AI agreements

    Not determined

    No bilateral or multilateral AI governance cooperation agreement involving Tunisia was found in sources opened as of Oct 2026; non-binding declarations (Kigali 2025 and, where applicable, Paris 2025 or New Delhi 2026) are recorded under R7.2 and R7.10.

  5. R7.5

    Election integrity AI provisions

    Not determined

    No legal or institutional provision addressing AI in elections was found for Tunisia in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

  6. R7.6

    Disinformation response framework

    Evidence found

    Ad hoc: A judicial investigation was opened in Aug 2024 into a viral campaign video described as AI-generated and inciting civil war; no dedicated AI-disinformation framework was found in sources opened.

    Sources fr.allafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

  7. R7.7

    AI election incidents documented

    Evidence found

    One reported incident (Aug 2024): during the 2024 presidential campaign a video attributed to a candidate's supporter inciting civil war, described by El Massar's secretary-general as AI-generated, led to a judicial investigation. AI generation was asserted by a politician, not forensically verified.

    Sources fr.allafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

  8. R7.8

    Platform content moderation

    Not determined

    No government engagement with platforms on AI content moderation was found for Tunisia in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

  9. R7.9

    Geneva Dialogue participation

    Not determined

    Tunisia does not appear on the UN list of national statements from the inaugural Global Dialogue on AI Governance (Geneva, 6-7 July 2026). No statement does not prove non-attendance, since the Dialogue is open to all Member States, so participation is not determined.

    Sources un.org (opens in a new tab)un.org (2) (opens in a new tab)

  10. R7.10

    G20/multilateral AI engagement

    Not determined

    Tunisia is not on the Paris AI Action Summit statement signatory list (Feb 2025), the initial New Delhi AI Impact Summit Declaration endorser list (87 states, 20 Feb 2026; later joiners not fully listed) or the G20 Johannesburg 2025 invited-states list. No other multilateral AI initiative participation was found.

    Sources elysee.fr (opens in a new tab)digitalpolicyalert.org (opens in a new tab)en.wikipedia.org (opens in a new tab)

P8 · Weight 10% of composite

Implementation & Impact

1.60 / 4Emerging

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. North Africa mean 1.05 · all 54 states mean 0.78.

10 indicators: 0 evidence found, 2 confirmed absence, 8 not determined.

  1. M8.1

    AI governance budget disbursed

    Not determined

    The national AI strategy was still unpublished as of Aug 2026 (announced late 2023, called 'nearly complete' Nov 2024), and no AI governance budget was reported. A national supercomputer (32 million dinars) was installed at CCK in July 2026; this is compute infrastructure, not governance spending.

    Sources lapresse.tn (opens in a new tab)leconomistemaghrebin.com (opens in a new tab)

  2. M8.2

    Health AI regulation

    Confirmed absence

    None: La Presse's review (30 Aug 2026) reports that no formal AI rules exist yet in sectors including healthcare, and that no AI-specific legislation has been identified.

    Sources lapresse.tn (opens in a new tab)

  3. M8.3

    Health AI devices approved

    Not determined

    No data was found on AI health devices approved by a Tunisian regulator.

  4. M8.4

    Government AI system registry

    Not determined

    No government AI registry was found. OECD.AI lists 'AI Use Cases in the Public Sector' (2019), a grouping of use cases rather than a maintained registry.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  5. M8.5

    AI governance M&E reports

    Not determined

    No M&E report was located for the 2021 AI Roadmap or the unpublished strategy.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)lapresse.tn (opens in a new tab)

  6. M8.6

    Agriculture AI governance

    Not determined

    No agriculture-specific AI governance provisions were found; the national strategy remained unpublished as of Aug 2026.

    Sources lapresse.tn (opens in a new tab)

  7. M8.7

    Financial services AI governance

    Confirmed absence

    None: La Presse (30 Aug 2026) reports that credit scoring and fraud detection are emerging without formal AI rules, and identifies no Central Bank of Tunisia AI programme.

    Sources lapresse.tn (opens in a new tab)

  8. M8.8

    Education AI governance

    Not determined

    No education-ministry AI guidance was located in this pass.

    Sources lapresse.tn (opens in a new tab)

  9. M8.9

    Measurable governance outcomes

    Not determined

    No documented protective outcome was found. The 2004 data protection law is described by government as 'obsolete' (Aug 2026), and no INPDP AI initiatives were detailed.

    Sources lapresse.tn (opens in a new tab)

  10. M8.10

    WHO AI health guidance adoption

    Not determined

    No evidence was found of formal adoption of the WHO AI-for-health guidance.

Method

What is the Africa AI Governance Index?

The Africa AI Governance Index 2026 assesses 8 pillars of national AI governance. Each pillar is examined through 10 indicators. The Index is diagnostic. It measures formal governance instruments, not capability. Composite differences under about 0.1 are not meaningful.

Indicator score key

Indicator score key, 0 to 4
ScoreDefinition
0 No evidenceNo policy, institution, or activity. Confirmed absence.
1 NascentInitial discussion, concept note, informal working group.
2 DevelopingDraft policy, institution forming, pilot, or formal consultation.
3 EstablishedAdopted policy or operational institution; limited enforcement.
4 AdvancedFully operational with enforcement and measurable outcomes.

Maturity tiers

Applied to pillar and composite means.

Maturity tiers by score range
TierMean score
NascentBelow 1.00
Emerging1.00 to 1.99
Developing2.00 to 2.99
Established3.00 and above

How scores are built

A pillar score is the mean of the scored indicators in that pillar. Confirmed absence scores 0. An indicator where nothing could be determined is excluded from the pillar mean and reported as not scored. A score with no supporting evidence is excluded.

The composite is 15% of each of pillars P1 to P4 plus 10% of each of pillars P5 to P8, on a scale of 0 to 4. In other words, P1, P2, P3, P4 carry 15% each and P5, P6, P7, P8 carry 10% each.

Source: Africa AI Governance Index 2026 Final Dataset, 54 countries, built 6 October 2026. Lawyers Hub, Africa AI Policy Lab. Version 1.2, 7 October 2026.

Suggested citation

Lawyers Hub, Africa AI Policy Lab (2026). Country Profile on AI Governance: Tunisia. Africa AI Governance Index 2026, version 1.2, 7 October 2026. https://www.aipolicy.africa/country-profiles/tunisia