Africa AI Governance Index 2026 · Country profile on AI governance

Country Profile on AI Governance: Egypt

Egypt scores 2.25 out of 4 on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026. It sits in the Developing tier and ranks 7 of 54 states.

Region
North Africa
Version
1.2 · 7 October 2026
Evidence reference date
30 June 2026
Overview

Egypt at a glance

How to read this profile

Indicator evidence in this factsheet comes from desk research in October 2026. Fellows have not verified it and it did not inform the score.

The Index is diagnostic. It measures formal governance instruments, not capability. Composite differences under about 0.1 are not meaningful.

Country

Population (2024)
116.5 million
Region
North Africa
Regional economic communities
Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa
Geography
Coastal, 17 international submarine cable systems in service

Governance status

  • National AI strategy S1.1

    Implementednot scored

  • Data protection law G2.2

    Enforced with DPAnot scored

  • AI regulatory body G2.5

    Establishednot scored

  • Malabo Convention ratification G2.7

    Not signednot scored

  • Kigali Declaration endorsement R7.2

    Endorsednot scored

Headline assessment

Egypt scores 2.25 out of 4 on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026. It sits in the Developing tier and ranks 7 of 54 states. The eight pillar scores are fellow-assigned values from the Regional Summary. Indicators are not scored individually. The strongest pillar is Strategy & Vision (3.33). The weakest is Implementation & Impact (1.50). The North Africa mean is 1.57. The mean for all 54 states is 1.33.

Strongest pillar
Strategy & Vision3.33 / 4Established
Weakest pillar
Implementation & Impact1.50 / 4Emerging

Indicators scored: Pillar level only (fellow-assigned)

Pillar scores

Pillar scores at a glance

Each pillar is scored from 0 to 4. Egypt's eight pillar scores are fellow-assigned values; indicators are not scored individually.

Bar chart of Egypt's eight pillar scores out of 4, compared with the North Africa mean and the mean of all 54 states. The same figures are listed beside each bar and in the table below.
  • Egypt score
  • North Africa mean
  • All 54 states mean
  1. P1Strategy & Vision
    3.33Established

    North Africa: 2.23
    All 54 states: 1.76

  2. P2Governance & Regulation
    1.90Emerging

    North Africa: 1.56
    All 54 states: 1.32

  3. P3Infrastructure & Data
    2.50Developing

    North Africa: 1.63
    All 54 states: 1.51

  4. P4Human Capital
    2.20Developing

    North Africa: 1.54
    All 54 states: 1.20

  5. P5Innovation & Ecosystem
    2.00Developing

    North Africa: 1.39
    All 54 states: 1.05

  6. P6Ethics & Inclusion
    1.90Emerging

    North Africa: 1.33
    All 54 states: 1.26

  7. P7Regional Integration
    2.20Developing

    North Africa: 1.47
    All 54 states: 1.55

  8. P8Implementation & Impact
    1.50Emerging

    North Africa: 1.05
    All 54 states: 0.78

  9. Composite (weighted)
    2.25Developing

    North Africa: 1.57
    All 54 states: 1.33

View the pillar scores as a table
Egypt pillar scores on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026
PillarBasisWeightScore (0–4)MaturityNorth Africa meanAfrica mean
P1 Strategy & VisionFellow-assigned15%3.33Established2.231.76
P2 Governance & RegulationFellow-assigned15%1.90Emerging1.561.32
P3 Infrastructure & DataFellow-assigned15%2.50Developing1.631.51
P4 Human CapitalFellow-assigned15%2.20Developing1.541.20
P5 Innovation & EcosystemFellow-assigned10%2.00Developing1.391.05
P6 Ethics & InclusionFellow-assigned10%1.90Emerging1.331.26
P7 Regional IntegrationFellow-assigned10%2.20Developing1.471.55
P8 Implementation & ImpactFellow-assigned10%1.50Emerging1.050.78
Composite (weighted)—100%2.25Developing1.571.33
Country report

What the scores say about Egypt

Egypt scores 2.25 out of 4 on the composite, in the Developing tier, and ranks 7 of 54. The eight pillar scores are fellow-assigned values from the Regional Summary, and indicators are not scored. The strongest pillar is Strategy and Vision at 3.33 and the weakest is Implementation and Impact at 1.50. The composite sits above the North Africa mean of 1.57 and the Africa mean of 1.33. Desk research in October 2026, which fellows have not verified and which did not inform the scores, found a second national AI strategy for 2025 to 2030, a standing National Council for AI and non-binding governance guidance, with a draft AI law before Parliament and no published budget or monitoring report.

P1Strategy & Vision3.33 / 4Established

Strategy and Vision scores 3.33, in the Established tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found that Egypt issued its first National AI Strategy in May 2021 and that President Sisi launched the second edition, for 2025 to 2030, on 22 January 2025 (S1.1, S1.2). The National Council for AI, created by Prime Ministerial Decree 2889 of 2019 and restructured by Decree 207 of 2026, reports every six months to the Prime Minister (S1.3). A Capacity Assessment Framework of 89 indicators is evaluated annually, though no formal evaluation has been completed or made public (S1.9). A dedicated AI budget and alignment with the African Union Continental AI Strategy are not determined (S1.4, S1.5).

See the 10 indicators for Strategy & Vision

P2Governance & Regulation1.90 / 4Emerging

Governance and Regulation scores 1.90, in the Emerging tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found a draft AI law before Parliament; Egypt relies on existing laws and the non-binding Charter for Responsible AI of 2023 (G2.1). The Personal Data Protection Law No. 151 of 2020 entered into force on 16 October 2020, its Executive Regulations took effect on 1 November 2025, and full enforcement begins on 31 October 2026 (G2.2). The National Council for AI has no AI enforcement powers identified (G2.5). The research confirmed that Egypt has not signed the Malabo Convention (G2.7). An AI mandate for the PDPC, its staffing and budget, and enforcement actions are not determined (G2.3, G2.4, G2.8).

See the 10 indicators for Governance & Regulation

P3Infrastructure & Data2.50 / 4Developing

Infrastructure and Data scores 2.50, in the Developing tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found 14 data centres listed across 5 markets (I3.1). TeleGeography data lists 7 landing points carrying 17 distinct international cable systems (I3.3). Huawei Cloud announced a Cairo Region in May 2024; five other providers checked list no region or zone in Egypt (I3.5). The Personal Data Protection Law requires a licence or permit for cross-border transfers (I3.8). On 9 September 2026 the ICT minister announced a first large-scale AI data centre, 20 MW initially with a 200 MW target (I3.10). Live capacity in MW, international bandwidth and GPU or HPC access are not determined (I3.2, I3.4, I3.6).

See the 10 indicators for Infrastructure & Data

P4Human Capital2.20 / 4Developing

Human Capital scores 2.20, in the Developing tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found 2390 AI scholarly publications for 2024 and 2662 for 2023 in the CSET Country Activity Tracker (H4.4). On 15 January 2025 the Education Minister announced that AI and programming would become core subjects for first-year secondary students from the 2025/26 school year (H4.6). The Digital Egypt Pioneers Initiative trains youth aged 18 to 32 in ICT tracks; the share of AI-specific tracks is not quantified (H4.7). Modern Standard Arabic and Egyptian Arabic are supported (H4.10). AI researchers per million, a national count of university AI programmes, AI patents and a labour transition policy are not determined (H4.1, H4.3, H4.5, H4.8).

See the 10 indicators for Human Capital

P5Innovation & Ecosystem2.00 / 4Developing

Innovation and Ecosystem scores 2.00, in the Developing tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found the Egyptian Organization for Standardization and Quality among 61 participating members of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 (N5.8). In March 2026 the National Council for AI published a national AI governance framework with a four-tier risk model, as non-binding guidance (N5.9). Egypt signed a letter of intent with the United Nations Development Programme in July 2026 for a national AI sandbox, with no launch date (N5.4). Partech records US$358M in 2025 tech equity funding across 80 deals, a proxy that is not AI-specific (N5.2). Incubators, government AI procurement, safety evaluation capacity and university-industry partnerships are not determined (N5.3, N5.5, N5.6, N5.10).

See the 10 indicators for Innovation & Ecosystem

P6Ethics & Inclusion1.90 / 4Emerging

Ethics and Inclusion scores 1.90, in the Emerging tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found voluntary instruments: the non-binding Egyptian Charter for Responsible AI of 2023 requires a prior impact assessment for government AI projects, and 2026 national guidelines add post-deployment audit (E6.1, E6.2). No mandatory bias audit was found. No general statutory AI transparency obligation is reported beyond fintech decrees (E6.3). Only a general data protection complaint route exists (E6.4). The research confirmed the absence of judicial precedent on AI (E6.5). The National Council for AI has no civil society or youth seat (E6.6, E6.8, E6.10). Egypt adhered to the OECD Recommendation on AI in 2021 (E6.7).

See the 10 indicators for Ethics & Inclusion

P7Regional Integration2.20 / 4Developing

Regional Integration scores 2.20, in the Developing tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found Egypt on the official signatory list of the Africa Declaration on Artificial Intelligence, done at Kigali on 4 April 2025; no explicit statement of alignment with the African Union Continental AI Strategy was found (R7.1, R7.2). Egypt is a full BRICS member, signed the Paris AI Action Summit Statement on 11 February 2025 and is among the 87 initial endorsers of the New Delhi AI Impact Summit Declaration (R7.10). It is a member of COMESA and CEN-SAD, with no AI coordination found at that level (R7.3). Cross-border AI agreements, election provisions and a disinformation framework are not determined (R7.4, R7.5, R7.6).

See the 10 indicators for Regional Integration

P8Implementation & Impact1.50 / 4Emerging

Implementation and Impact scores 1.50, in the Emerging tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found evidence on one indicator: the Supreme Council of Universities adopted guidelines on AI use in higher education and research in February 2025 (M8.8). The other 9 indicators are not determined. The strategy for 2025 to 2030 was reported without a committed or disbursed budget figure (M8.1). No health-specific AI regulation was located, and no count of approved AI medical devices was found (M8.2, M8.3). Reporting on the National AI Governance Framework of 29 March 2026 describes no registry of government AI systems (M8.4). No published monitoring or progress report from the National Council for AI was located (M8.5).

See the 10 indicators for Implementation & Impact

Indicator evidence

Evidence by pillar

Desk-research evidence for each indicator, with sources. Where an indicator is marked “Not determined”, the research could not establish a finding. The Index method excludes such indicators from scoring rather than scoring them as absent.

P1 · Weight 15% of composite

Strategy & Vision

3.33 / 4Established

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. North Africa mean 2.23 · all 54 states mean 1.76.

10 indicators: 8 evidence found, 0 confirmed absence, 2 not determined.

  1. S1.1

    National AI strategy existence

    Evidence found

    Implemented: First National AI Strategy issued May 2021; second edition (2025-2030) launched by President Sisi on 22 Jan 2025 and issued by the National Council for AI. Implementation instruments followed, including the Egyptian Charter for Responsible AI (2023) and 2026 national generative-AI guidelines and governance framework.

    Sources en.amwalalghad.com (opens in a new tab)digitalpolicyalert.org (opens in a new tab)legal500.com (opens in a new tab)

  2. S1.2

    Strategy adoption date

    Evidence found

    2025-01: Current (second) edition 2025-2030 issued by the National Council for AI on 22 Jan 2025 (announced by MCIT 9 Dec 2024). First edition: May 2021.

    Sources digitalpolicyalert.org (opens in a new tab)en.amwalalghad.com (opens in a new tab)legal500.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. S1.3

    Political commitment signals

    Evidence found

    Institutional action: The National Council for AI was created by Prime Ministerial Decree 2889 of 2019 and restructured by Decree 207 of 2026. It is chaired by the ICT Minister and reports every six months to the Prime Minister for presidential submission. President Sisi personally launched the 2025-2030 strategy on 22 Jan 2025.

    Sources legal500.com (opens in a new tab)en.amwalalghad.com (opens in a new tab)

  4. S1.4

    Dedicated AI budget allocation

    Not determined

    No dedicated AI budget figure found in OECD.AI, Legal500 or launch coverage (2025-2026).

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)legal500.com (opens in a new tab)en.amwalalghad.com (opens in a new tab)

  5. S1.5

    AU Continental AI Strategy alignment

    Not determined

    No source found assessing the 2025-2030 strategy's alignment with the AU Continental AI Strategy.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)en.amwalalghad.com (opens in a new tab)

  6. S1.6

    Multi-stakeholder consultation

    Evidence found

    Formal consultation: OECD.AI records that the second strategy was developed through multi-stakeholder engagement involving ministries, independent experts, private sector, academia and the technical community (record updated Feb 2026).

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  7. S1.7

    Sector prioritisation

    Evidence found

    Specific sectors with targets: Priority sectors include healthcare, education and agriculture, with projects such as smart irrigation and automated diagnostics. National targets for 2030 include 30,000 AI specialists, 250+ startups, a 7.7% ICT/AI GDP contribution and a national foundation model.

    Sources en.amwalalghad.com (opens in a new tab)oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)itweb.africa (opens in a new tab)

  8. S1.8

    Implementation roadmap

    Evidence found

    Milestones with accountability: OECD.AI describes measurable milestones and KPIs evaluated annually, and the NCAI (meets monthly) reports semi-annually to the Prime Minister. A detailed public roadmap document was not reviewed.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)legal500.com (opens in a new tab)

  9. S1.9

    Monitoring and evaluation framework

    Evidence found

    Established: A Capacity Assessment Framework of 89 indicators is evaluated annually (OECD.AI), with semi-annual NCAI reporting to the PM. OECD.AI notes no formal evaluation has been completed or made public.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)legal500.com (opens in a new tab)

  10. S1.10

    Strategy review mechanism

    Evidence found

    Adaptive governance mechanism: The NCAI's decree mandate includes formulating and updating the national AI strategy and recommending legislative changes, as shown by the 2021 strategy being revised into the 2025-2030 edition. A draft AI law is on Parliament's agenda.

    Sources legal500.com (opens in a new tab)digitalpolicyalert.org (opens in a new tab)

P2 · Weight 15% of composite

Governance & Regulation

1.90 / 4Emerging

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. North Africa mean 1.56 · all 54 states mean 1.32.

10 indicators: 4 evidence found, 1 confirmed absence, 5 not determined.

  1. G2.1

    AI-specific legislation

    Evidence found

    Draft: Legal 500's Egypt AI guide (2026) states that a draft AI law is currently before Parliament and that the Second National AI Strategy (2025-2030) names enactment of an AI law as a primary mechanism. Egypt currently relies on existing laws, including PDPL No. 151/2020, plus the non-binding Charter for Responsible AI (NCAI, 2023).

    Sources legal500.com (opens in a new tab)

  2. G2.2

    Data protection law status

    Evidence found

    Enforced with DPA: The Personal Data Protection Law No. 151 of 2020 was passed on 13 July 2020 and entered into force on 16 October 2020, but its Executive Regulations were only issued by MCIT Decree No. 816 of 2025, effective 1 November 2025. The PDPC now issues licences and guidelines, with a 12-month grace period and full enforcement from 31 October 2026.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)cms.law (opens in a new tab)clydeco.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. G2.3

    DPA AI mandate

    Not determined

    The PDPC is operational and has issued guidelines on consent, licensing, ROPA and DPOs (CMS, 2026), but no explicit AI oversight mandate was located; AI strategy and governance sit with the National Council for AI. dataprotection.africa (May 2022) records no right not to be subject to automated decision-making under the PDPL.

    Sources cms.law (opens in a new tab)dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)legal500.com (opens in a new tab)

  4. G2.4

    DPA staffing and budget

    Not determined

    Published DPA staff count and annual budget were not located in this desk review (October 2026). dataprotection.africa (May 2022) records 10 members of the DPA board, with repeatedly renewable terms.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)

  5. G2.5

    AI regulatory body existence

    Evidence found

    Established: Prime Ministerial Decree No. 2889 of 2019 (24 November 2019) created the National Council for Artificial Intelligence under the Prime Minister to formulate and govern the national AI strategy; it launched the Second National AI Strategy 2025-2030 on 22 January 2025. Decree No. 207 of 2026 (18 January 2026) restructured it as the National Council for AI, Quantum Computing and Emerging Technologies. It is a governance and strategy council with no AI enforcement powers identified.

    Sources legal500.com (opens in a new tab)digitalpolicyalert.org (opens in a new tab)

  6. G2.6

    Institutional design model

    Not determined

    AI governance combines a central strategy council (NCAI), the PDPC for personal data, and sectoral regulators; for example, the FRA addresses robo-advisory and automated credit scoring through fintech frameworks (Legal 500, 2026). No source formally labels the model, and a Centre for Responsible AI is planned under the 2025-2030 strategy.

    Sources legal500.com (opens in a new tab)

  7. G2.7

    Malabo Convention ratification

    Confirmed absence

    Not signed: The AU official status list of the Malabo Convention dated 02/02/2026 records no signature, ratification or deposit for Egypt. The Convention entered into force on 8 June 2023; the list counts 21 signatures and 20 ratifications.

    Sources au.int (opens in a new tab)au.int (2) (opens in a new tab)

  8. G2.8

    Enforcement actions taken

    Not determined

    No AI-related enforcement action (investigation, fine or order concerning AI or automated processing) was located in this desk review (October 2026); absence is not confirmed because DPA decision registers were not accessible.

  9. G2.9

    Extraterritorial provisions

    Evidence found

    Partial coverage: dataprotection.africa (May 2022) records that the PDPL applies to foreign entities, and the 2025 Executive Regulations make cross-border transfers subject to PDPC licensing or authorisation (CMS, 2026). Coverage is via data protection law; no AI-specific extraterritorial clause was found.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)cms.law (opens in a new tab)

  10. G2.10

    IP framework for AI

    Not determined

    Legal 500 (2026) lists the Intellectual Property Protection Law No. 82 of 2002 among existing laws applied to AI, without reporting any review or amendment for AI-generated content. IP-specific searches could not be completed, so absence is not confirmed.

    Sources legal500.com (opens in a new tab)

P3 · Weight 15% of composite

Infrastructure & Data

2.50 / 4Developing

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. North Africa mean 1.63 · all 54 states mean 1.51.

10 indicators: 6 evidence found, 0 confirmed absence, 4 not determined.

  1. I3.1

    Data center count

    Evidence found

    Data Center Map's Egypt page (accessed 2026-10-06) lists 14 data centres across 5 markets: Cairo 10, Alexandria 1, Suez 1, 6th of October City 1, Mansoura 1. Egypt is not included on the site's Africa page.

    Sources datacentermap.com (opens in a new tab)

  2. I3.2

    Data center capacity (MW)

    Not determined

    No published national total of live data centre MW was verified. On 9 Sep 2026 a planned AI data centre was announced at 20 MW initial capacity (200 MW target), which is pipeline and not live capacity; Data Center Map lists 14 facilities.

    Sources tech.africa (opens in a new tab)datacentermap.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. I3.3

    Submarine cable landing points

    Evidence found

    TeleGeography Submarine Cable Map data (accessed 2026-10-06) lists 7 landing point(s) in Egypt served by at least one in-service international cable (Abu Talat, Alexandria, Port Said, Ras Ghareb, Suez, Taba, Zafarana), carrying 17 distinct international cable systems: incl. 2Africa, AAE-1, EIG, FALCON, IMEWE, Medusa, PEACE, SEA-ME-WE 4 and 5; Sharm el-Sheikh and Sidi Kerir land only domestic or not-yet-in-service systems.

    Sources submarinecablemap.com (opens in a new tab)submarinecablemap.com (2) (opens in a new tab)submarinecablemap.com (3) (opens in a new tab)

  4. I3.4

    International bandwidth (Gbps)

    Not determined

    No dated national international-bandwidth figure for Egypt was verified. ITU DataHub (indicator: international bandwidth usage) returned HTTP 403 and robots-disallowed errors on 2026-10-06, and searches of the regulator and press found no usable national figure in this pass.

  5. I3.5

    Hyperscaler presence

    Evidence found

    1 provider: Huawei Cloud announced its Cairo Region in May 2024, describing it as the first public cloud region in Egypt. As of 2026-10-06, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle and Alibaba list no region, availability zone or local zone in Egypt; their only African regions are in South Africa (Oracle also in Morocco).

    Sources aws.amazon.com (opens in a new tab)aws.amazon.com (2) (opens in a new tab)learn.microsoft.com (opens in a new tab)

  6. I3.6

    GPU/HPC access

    Not determined

    On 9 Sep 2026 Egypt announced its first large-scale AI data centre with Nvidia technology (Vodafone Business, Elsewedy Electric and Cassava), targeting 20 MW within three years and 200 MW at full build. No GPU count or site has been named. Existing academic or commercial GPU/HPC access in Egypt was not verified in this pass.

    Sources khaleejtimes.com (opens in a new tab)tech.africa (opens in a new tab)

  7. I3.7

    Data localisation provisions

    Not determined

    PDPL No. 151/2020 requires a licence for transfers (DLA Piper, accessed 2026-10-06). No general storage mandate is reported there or in CIPESA's Nov 2022 review; sectoral rules (for example banking) were not verified in this pass.

    Sources dlapiperdataprotection.com (opens in a new tab)cipesa.org (opens in a new tab)

  8. I3.8

    Cross-border data flow framework

    Evidence found

    Comprehensive: DLA Piper Data Protection Laws of the World (accessed 2026-10-06): Personal Data Protection Law No. 151 of 2020, Article 14, prohibits transfers to countries whose protection falls below the Law's level and requires a licence or permit from the Data Protection Centre; Article 15 sets consent-based exceptions.

    Sources dlapiperdataprotection.com (opens in a new tab)

  9. I3.9

    Foreign AI surveillance spending

    Evidence found

    IDS/ADRN, Smart City Surveillance in Africa (March 2026), Table 2 puts the total cost of Egypt's smart/safe city surveillance by 2025 at US$58m (about 6,000 smart cameras), with suppliers from China, Korea, the USA and Japan. This includes a Honeywell (USA) security systems contract for the New Administrative Capital reported at US$31m (Enterprise 2018).

    Sources ids.ac.uk (opens in a new tab)

  10. I3.10

    Sovereign cloud initiatives

    Evidence found

    Planned: Middle East AI News (22 Jun 2026) reports that Egypt's electricity, ICT and investment ministers set up a joint working group to draft a national data centre strategy, framed as a pillar of digital sovereignty. On 9 Sep 2026 the ICT minister announced Egypt's first large-scale AI data centre (20 MW initially, 200 MW target, US$1bn), to be built by Vodafone Business, Elsewedy Electric and Cassava.

    Sources middleeastainews.com (opens in a new tab)khaleejtimes.com (opens in a new tab)

P4 · Weight 15% of composite

Human Capital

2.20 / 4Developing

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. North Africa mean 1.54 · all 54 states mean 1.20.

10 indicators: 4 evidence found, 0 confirmed absence, 6 not determined.

  1. H4.1

    AI researchers per million

    Not determined

    No consistent cross-country source of AI-specific researchers per million was found or could be queried for this country as of Oct 2026 (the planned OpenAlex author query was blocked by an API rate limit on 2026-10-06). Context only: UNESCO UIS via World Bank indicator SP.POP.SCIE.RD.P6 reports 1120.2 total R&D researchers (all fields, FTE) per million people in 2024; this is not an AI-specific figure.

    Sources api.worldbank.org (opens in a new tab)

  2. H4.2

    DPA staff with AI competency

    Not determined

    No published source was found on the number of data protection authority staff with demonstrable AI technical skills as of Oct 2026; DPA annual reports were not located within the research budget of this pass.

  3. H4.3

    University AI programs

    Not determined

    No national count found. CIO (undated, c.2019) reports the government launched its first AI faculty at Kafr El Sheikh University; several dedicated public and private faculties of AI exist, but no authoritative total was opened in this pass.

    Sources cio.com (opens in a new tab)

  4. H4.4

    African-authored AI publications

    Evidence found

    CSET Country Activity Tracker (Merged Academic Corpus) via Our World in Data, series 'AI scholarly publications - Field: All', entity Egypt (EGY), reference year 2024: 2390 publications (2023: 2662). Counts articles with at least one author at an institution in the country, English title/abstract only; dataset last updated 27 Apr 2026. OpenAlex could not be used because the API was rate-limited on 2026-10-06.

    Data note: CSET/OWID AI publications 2022–24: 2403, 2662, 2390.

    Sources ourworldindata.org (opens in a new tab)ourworldindata.org (2) (opens in a new tab)

  5. H4.5

    AI patents filed

    Not determined

    No country-level count of AI-related domestic patent filings was retrieved as of Oct 2026. WIPO IP Statistics and national IP office data were not accessible in this pass, and no published AI-patent figure for this country was found.

  6. H4.6

    K-12 CS education

    Evidence found

    Mandatory in some grades: On 15 Jan 2025 Education Minister Mohamed Abdel-Latif announced that AI and programming would become core subjects for first-year secondary (Grade 10) students from the 2025/26 school year (AACRAO EDGE, Jan 2025). Implementation details for 2026 were not verified.

    Sources aacrao.org (opens in a new tab)

  7. H4.7

    AI workforce training programs

    Evidence found

    At scale: MCIT's free Digital Egypt Pioneers Initiative (DEPI), launched 2024-25 with the Egyptian Military Academy and firms including Google, Microsoft, IBM, AWS and Huawei, trains youth aged 18-32 in ICT tracks. Global Knowledge describes it as one of the largest national digital upskilling programmes. Share of AI-specific tracks not quantified.

    Sources egyptinnovate.com (opens in a new tab)globalknowledge.com (opens in a new tab)

  8. H4.8

    Labour transition policy

    Not determined

    No government framework on AI and labour-market transition (adopted, draft or under discussion) was found for this country in the sources opened in this pass (Oct 2026).

  9. H4.9

    Informal economy AI assessment

    Not determined

    No government assessment of AI's impact on the informal economy was found for this country in the sources opened in this pass (Oct 2026).

  10. H4.10

    African language NLP coverage

    Evidence found

    Count of domestic non-European languages in Meta NLLB-200/FLORES-200 or Google Translate (Cloud Translation list accessed Oct 2026; Jun 2024 expansion), mapped by the researcher. Supported: Modern Standard Arabic (NLLB arb_Arab; Google ar) and Egyptian Arabic (NLLB arz_Arab). Nubian languages and Beja are not listed.

    Sources raw.githubusercontent.com (opens in a new tab)cloud.google.com (opens in a new tab)blog.google (opens in a new tab)

P5 · Weight 10% of composite

Innovation & Ecosystem

2.00 / 4Developing

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. North Africa mean 1.39 · all 54 states mean 1.05.

10 indicators: 6 evidence found, 0 confirmed absence, 4 not determined.

  1. N5.1

    AI companies count

    Evidence found

    TechBehemoths directory (accessed Oct 2026, page undated) states 'There are 18 Companies in Egypt that provide Artificial Intelligence Services'. Directory of self-listed IT service firms: a lower bound, not a census of AI startups.

    Sources techbehemoths.com (opens in a new tab)

  2. N5.2

    Private AI investment (USD)

    Evidence found

    PROXY, not AI-specific: Partech Africa 2025 report (published 22 Jan 2026) records US$358M in 2025 tech equity funding for Egypt (+21% YoY) across 80 deals. Partech gives no AI-specific country figure.

    Sources cdn-website.partechpartners.com (opens in a new tab)partechpartners.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. N5.3

    AI incubators/accelerators

    Not determined

    No count established. The FRA regulatory sandbox (launched mid-2025) had supported about 40 companies and approved 7 initiatives by 29 Jul 2026, including two AI insurance projects, but it is a fintech/insurtech sandbox, not an AI incubator or accelerator.

    Sources menastartupdigest.com (opens in a new tab)

  4. N5.4

    Regulatory sandbox (AI)

    Evidence found

    Planned: Egypt signed a letter of intent with UNDP (July 2026, WSIS Forum Geneva) to establish a national AI sandbox for supervised testing before deployment; no launch date given. Separately, the FRA fintech/insurtech sandbox (not AI-specific) gave preliminary approval to two AI insurance projects on 29 Jul 2026, and the CBE has run a fintech sandbox since 2019 (not AI-specific).

    Sources meatechwatch.com (opens in a new tab)english.ahram.org.eg (opens in a new tab)menastartupdigest.com (opens in a new tab)

  5. N5.5

    Government AI procurement

    Not determined

    Not determined. The Legal500 Egypt AI chapter (2026) covers the AI strategy, Responsible AI Charter, draft AI law and FRA Decree 57/2024 but describes no AI procurement framework or domestic-developer preference.

    Sources legal500.com (opens in a new tab)

  6. N5.6

    AI safety evaluation capacity

    Not determined

    No evaluation facility identified. The national AI governance framework (Mar 2026) requires a 'dual-check' of ethical impact assessment plus technical audit for high-risk systems, and a UNDP-supported AI sandbox is planned (Jul 2026), but no dedicated testing lab was found.

    Sources middleeastainews.com (opens in a new tab)oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)meatechwatch.com (opens in a new tab)

  7. N5.7

    ISO/IEC 42001 adoption

    Evidence found

    Aware: Egypt's standards body EOS is a participating (P) member of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 (list dated Oct 2026), the committee that developed ISO/IEC 42001, so the standard is known at standards-body level. No 42001 certification of an organisation in the country and no national adoption was found.

    Sources iso.org (opens in a new tab)

  8. N5.8

    Standards body AI competency

    Evidence found

    AI technical committee: Egyptian Organization for Standardization and Quality (EOS) is one of 61 participating (P) members of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 Artificial intelligence (list dated Oct 2026). P-membership implies an active national mirror committee; the mirror committee's name was not separately verified.

    Sources iso.org (opens in a new tab)

  9. N5.9

    AI risk assessment frameworks

    Evidence found

    Voluntary guidelines: Egypt's National Council for AI published a national AI governance framework and GenAI guidelines in March 2026. They set a four-tier risk model, with 'dual-check' compliance (ethical impact plus technical audit) for high-risk systems, but are non-binding guidance ahead of a draft AI law. Separately, FRA Decree 57/2024 regulates robo-advisers in finance.

    Sources middleeastainews.com (opens in a new tab)oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)legal500.com (opens in a new tab)

  10. N5.10

    University-industry AI partnerships

    Not determined

    No formal university-industry AI research partnership identified in sources opened.

P6 · Weight 10% of composite

Ethics & Inclusion

1.90 / 4Emerging

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. North Africa mean 1.33 · all 54 states mean 1.26.

10 indicators: 7 evidence found, 1 confirmed absence, 2 not determined.

  1. E6.1

    Algorithmic impact assessment

    Evidence found

    Voluntary guidelines: The non-binding Egyptian Charter for Responsible AI (NCAI, 2023) requires a prior impact assessment for government AI projects, with MCIT supervision (executive guidelines 14 and 16), and Legal500 states no binding AI statute is in force. The 2026 National Guidelines for Trustworthy and Responsible AI add pre-deployment assessment and post-deployment audit, framed as readiness for a future law (AfricaDataProtection, Jul 2026); GIRAI 2026 impact-assessment score 39.4.

    Sources legal500.com (opens in a new tab)africadataprotection.org (opens in a new tab)global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)

  2. E6.2

    Bias audit requirements

    Evidence found

    Voluntary: Egypt's National Guidelines for Trustworthy and Responsible AI include audit arrangements in institutional governance and post-deployment monitoring and audit across the lifecycle, framed as readiness for a future law (AfricaDataProtection, Jul 2026); GIRAI 2026 scores Egypt 50.0 on fairness and non-discrimination. No mandatory bias audit was found.

    Sources africadataprotection.org (opens in a new tab)global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)

  3. E6.3

    Transparency obligations

    Evidence found

    Sector-specific: FRA Board Decrees Nos. 139, 140 and 141 of 2023 impose governance, auditability and disclosure duties on supervised fintech entities, and the Strategy flags Decree 141 as addressing AI in financial consumer data (Legal500, 2026). Beyond fintech, Legal500 reports no general statutory AI transparency obligation; the non-binding Charter gives users a right to know they are interacting with AI (general guideline 2).

    Sources legal500.com (opens in a new tab)africadataprotection.org (opens in a new tab)global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)

  4. E6.4

    Citizen redress mechanism

    Evidence found

    DPA complaint: dataprotection.africa (May 2022) records that PDPL No. 151 of 2020 gives no right not to be subject to automated decision-making, and the PDPC became operational with Executive Regulations effective 1 Nov 2025 (CMS, Jan 2026), so only a general data protection complaint route exists. The non-binding Charter for Responsible AI says persons adversely affected by an AI decision must be able to challenge it on the basis of clear information about its logic (general guideline 4); no AI-specific complaint channel was found.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)cms.law (opens in a new tab)dlapiperdataprotection.com (opens in a new tab)

  5. E6.5

    Judicial AI remedy

    Confirmed absence

    No precedent: Legal500's Egypt AI chapter (2026) states that no Egyptian court has defined AI, addressed losses from autonomous AI decisions or model error, ruled on AI-training scraping or drawn the line between AI-assisted and AI-generated works. No specialist AI tribunal exists.

    Sources legal500.com (opens in a new tab)

  6. E6.6

    AI advisory body diversity

    Evidence found

    Exists, homogeneous: The National Council for AI (Decree 2889 of 2019; restructured by Decree 207 of 18 Jan 2026 as the National Council for AI, Quantum Computing and Emerging Technologies) is chaired by the ICT minister and comprises representatives of the ministries of Defence, Planning, Interior, Higher Education and Foreign Affairs, the General Intelligence Service, the Administrative Control Authority and three appointed experts (Legal500). No civil society, gender-balance or disciplinary-diversity provision was found.

    Sources legal500.com (opens in a new tab)

  7. E6.7

    Global AI governance participation

    Evidence found

    Active member: OECD.AI states Egypt was the first Arab and African country to adhere to the OECD Recommendation on AI (2021). Egypt signed the Paris AI Action Summit statement (11 Feb 2025), endorsed the New Delhi AI Impact Summit Declaration (20 Feb 2026) and launched a UNESCO RAM-based AI Readiness Assessment Report with UNESCO in Sep 2025; it is not on the GPAI member list as of Oct 2026.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)elysee.fr (opens in a new tab)digitalpolicyalert.org (opens in a new tab)

  8. E6.8

    Civil society AI engagement

    Evidence found

    Ad hoc consultation: Egypt's 2026 National Guidelines for Trustworthy and Responsible AI include a stakeholder-engagement pillar calling for collaboration among authorities, industry, academia and civil society (AfricaDataProtection, Jul 2026), and GIRAI 2026 scores Egypt 47.5 on government mechanisms for CSO inclusion. The NCAI's statutory membership includes no civil society seat (Legal500), so no formal advisory role was found.

    Sources africadataprotection.org (opens in a new tab)global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)legal500.com (opens in a new tab)

  9. E6.9

    African ethical framework reference

    Not determined

    Legal500 summarises the Charter as requiring foreign firms to train on locally relevant data and respect local customs and social norms (executive guideline 13); no reference to Ubuntu or African ethical principles was found in the sources opened, but the Charter and Strategy full texts were not read.

    Sources legal500.com (opens in a new tab)

  10. E6.10

    Youth participation

    Not determined

    No formal youth mechanism in AI governance was found; youth appear as beneficiaries of skills programmes (e.g., DEPI) rather than participants. NCAI membership has no youth seat (Legal500, 2026).

    Sources legal500.com (opens in a new tab)

P7 · Weight 10% of composite

Regional Integration

2.20 / 4Developing

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. North Africa mean 1.47 · all 54 states mean 1.55.

10 indicators: 3 evidence found, 0 confirmed absence, 7 not determined.

  1. R7.1

    AU AI Strategy alignment

    Evidence found

    Awareness: Egypt signed the Africa Declaration on AI (Kigali, 4 April 2025), whose clause 3.6.1 commits signatories to support national AI frameworks aligned with the AU Continental AI Strategy; Egypt's National AI Strategy 2025-2030 (2nd edition, NCAI) is profiled in a July 2026 comparative analysis, but no explicit Egypt-specific AU-alignment statement was found in sources opened.

    Sources c4ir.rw (opens in a new tab)africadataprotection.org (opens in a new tab)

  2. R7.2

    Kigali Declaration endorsement

    Evidence found

    Endorsed: Egypt appears on the official signatory list of the Africa Declaration on Artificial Intelligence, done at Kigali on 4 April 2025 (C4IR Rwanda PDF created 5 April 2025; list of AU, Smart Africa and 52 states). No evidence of a national implementation step specifically citing the Declaration was found as of Oct 2026.

    Sources c4ir.rw (opens in a new tab)aiexpoafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. R7.3

    REC AI governance coordination

    Not determined

    Egypt is a member of COMESA (1999) and CEN-SAD (2001). No REC-level AI governance coordination activity involving Egypt was found in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

    Sources en.wikipedia.org (opens in a new tab)

  4. R7.4

    Cross-border AI agreements

    Not determined

    No bilateral or multilateral AI governance cooperation agreement involving Egypt was found in sources opened as of Oct 2026; non-binding declarations (Kigali 2025 and, where applicable, Paris 2025 or New Delhi 2026) are recorded under R7.2 and R7.10.

  5. R7.5

    Election integrity AI provisions

    Not determined

    No legal or institutional provision addressing AI in elections was found for Egypt in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

  6. R7.6

    Disinformation response framework

    Not determined

    No government framework for responding to AI-generated disinformation was found for Egypt in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

  7. R7.7

    AI election incidents documented

    Not determined

    No documented AI-related election interference incident was found for Egypt in sources opened (search coverage incomplete); count not determined as of Oct 2026.

  8. R7.8

    Platform content moderation

    Not determined

    No government engagement with platforms on AI content moderation was found for Egypt in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

  9. R7.9

    Geneva Dialogue participation

    Not determined

    Egypt does not appear on the UN list of national statements from the inaugural Global Dialogue on AI Governance (Geneva, 6-7 July 2026). No statement does not prove non-attendance, since the Dialogue is open to all Member States, so participation is not determined.

    Sources un.org (opens in a new tab)un.org (2) (opens in a new tab)

  10. R7.10

    G20/multilateral AI engagement

    Evidence found

    Active participant: Egypt is a full BRICS member; signed the Paris AI Action Summit Statement on Inclusive and Sustainable AI (11 Feb 2025); is among the 87 initial endorsers of the New Delhi AI Impact Summit Declaration (20 Feb 2026); was an invited state at the G20 Johannesburg summit (22-23 Nov 2025), represented by PM Madbouly as 2025 NEPAD chair.

    Sources en.wikipedia.org (opens in a new tab)elysee.fr (opens in a new tab)digitalpolicyalert.org (opens in a new tab)

P8 · Weight 10% of composite

Implementation & Impact

1.50 / 4Emerging

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. North Africa mean 1.05 · all 54 states mean 0.78.

10 indicators: 1 evidence found, 0 confirmed absence, 9 not determined.

  1. M8.1

    AI governance budget disbursed

    Not determined

    The National AI Strategy 2.0 (2025-2030), released by the National Council for AI in January 2025, was reported without any committed or disbursed budget figure. The ISC country profile (Feb 2026) likewise found no AI budget data, committed or disbursed.

    Sources enterpriseam.com (opens in a new tab)council.science (opens in a new tab)

  2. M8.2

    Health AI regulation

    Not determined

    No health-specific AI regulation was located; the NCAI National AI Governance Framework (published 29 Mar 2026) applies a cross-sector four-tier risk classification rather than health rules. The Egyptian Drug Authority held a June 2026 panel on moving AI-powered regulatory systems 'from pilots to policy', which concerns AI used by the regulator, not rules for health AI.

    Sources menastartupdigest.com (opens in a new tab)edaegypt.gov.eg (opens in a new tab)council.science (opens in a new tab)

  3. M8.3

    Health AI devices approved

    Not determined

    No count of AI medical devices or tools approved by the Egyptian Drug Authority was found; the ISC profile (Feb 2026) reports no data on approved health AI tools.

    Sources council.science (opens in a new tab)edaegypt.gov.eg (opens in a new tab)

  4. M8.4

    Government AI system registry

    Not determined

    The National AI Governance Framework (29 Mar 2026) requires pre- and post-deployment oversight with technical conformity assessment by the Software Engineering Competence Centre, but reporting does not describe a registry of government AI systems.

    Sources menastartupdigest.com (opens in a new tab)council.science (opens in a new tab)

  5. M8.5

    AI governance M&E reports

    Not determined

    No published NCAI monitoring or progress report was located; the ISC profile (Feb 2026) notes the absence of NCAI M&E reports with metrics. A UNESCO AI Readiness Assessment report for Egypt was launched in 2025 and fed into Strategy 2.0, but it is a readiness diagnostic, not an implementation M&E report.

    Sources council.science (opens in a new tab)middleeastainews.com (opens in a new tab)

  6. M8.6

    Agriculture AI governance

    Not determined

    Strategy 2.0 (Jan 2025) names agriculture as a sector AI will support, but no agriculture-specific AI governance provisions were found.

    Sources enterpriseam.com (opens in a new tab)oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  7. M8.7

    Financial services AI governance

    Not determined

    The FRA chair has named AI and fintech the regulator's priority and operates an FRA sandbox, but the article cites no AI-specific decree or guidance. The ISC profile (Feb 2026) found no CBE or FRA AI rules for financial services.

    Sources businessmonthlyeg.com (opens in a new tab)council.science (opens in a new tab)

  8. M8.8

    Education AI governance

    Evidence found

    Guidelines: The Supreme Council of Universities adopted guidelines on AI use in higher education and research in February 2025. The Ministry of Education announced AI curricula with ethics content for the 2025-26 school year (27 Aug 2025), and the NCAI Generative AI Guidelines (Mar 2026) address education.

    Sources council.science (opens in a new tab)egyptianstreets.com (opens in a new tab)menastartupdigest.com (opens in a new tab)

  9. M8.9

    Measurable governance outcomes

    Not determined

    No documented case was found of AI governance producing a measurable protective outcome. The ISC profile (Feb 2026) notes that a personal data protection centre was established in 2025 but reports no outcome data.

    Sources council.science (opens in a new tab)

  10. M8.10

    WHO AI health guidance adoption

    Not determined

    No evidence was found that Egypt formally adopted the WHO Ethics and Governance of AI for Health guidance; the ISC profile (Feb 2026) explicitly lists WHO AI-health guidance adoption as a data gap.

    Sources council.science (opens in a new tab)

Method

What is the Africa AI Governance Index?

The Africa AI Governance Index 2026 assesses 8 pillars of national AI governance. Each pillar is examined through 10 indicators. The Index is diagnostic. It measures formal governance instruments, not capability. Composite differences under about 0.1 are not meaningful.

Indicator score key

Indicator score key, 0 to 4
ScoreDefinition
0 No evidenceNo policy, institution, or activity. Confirmed absence.
1 NascentInitial discussion, concept note, informal working group.
2 DevelopingDraft policy, institution forming, pilot, or formal consultation.
3 EstablishedAdopted policy or operational institution; limited enforcement.
4 AdvancedFully operational with enforcement and measurable outcomes.

Maturity tiers

Applied to pillar and composite means.

Maturity tiers by score range
TierMean score
NascentBelow 1.00
Emerging1.00 to 1.99
Developing2.00 to 2.99
Established3.00 and above

How scores are built

A pillar score is the mean of the scored indicators in that pillar. Confirmed absence scores 0. An indicator where nothing could be determined is excluded from the pillar mean and reported as not scored. A score with no supporting evidence is excluded.

The composite is 15% of each of pillars P1 to P4 plus 10% of each of pillars P5 to P8, on a scale of 0 to 4. In other words, P1, P2, P3, P4 carry 15% each and P5, P6, P7, P8 carry 10% each.

Source: Africa AI Governance Index 2026 Final Dataset, 54 countries, built 6 October 2026. Lawyers Hub, Africa AI Policy Lab. Version 1.2, 7 October 2026.

Suggested citation

Lawyers Hub, Africa AI Policy Lab (2026). Country Profile on AI Governance: Egypt. Africa AI Governance Index 2026, version 1.2, 7 October 2026. https://www.aipolicy.africa/country-profiles/egypt