Nigeria scores 2.87 out of 4 on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026, in the Developing tier, and ranks 2 of 54. Fellows scored 77 of 80 indicators. The strongest pillar is Ethics & Inclusion at 3.50 and the weakest is Implementation & Impact at 2.00. The composite stands well above the West Africa mean of 1.27 and the Africa mean of 1.33. The evidence explains the profile through a National AI Strategy co-created in 2024, the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023 and its commission, binding Central Bank of Nigeria rules for financial services and large public skills programmes. A standalone AI law, a public registry of government AI systems and a regular monitoring report series are absent.
P1Strategy & Vision3.00 / 4Established
Strategy & Vision scores 3.00, in the Established tier, with 10 of 10 indicators scored. The Federal Ministry of Communications, Innovation and Digital Economy held a 4-day co-creation workshop with over 120 experts in April 2024 and launched the draft National Artificial Intelligence Strategy in August 2024 (S1.1, score 3). Political commitment, alignment with the African Union Continental AI Strategy and multi-stakeholder consultation each score 4 (S1.3, S1.5, S1.6). AI funding sits inside the wider ministry and ICT budget, with no ring-fenced line (S1.4, score 3). Monitoring rests with the National Centre for Artificial Intelligence and Robotics (S1.9, score 2). The adoption date is recorded as 1 September 2025 (S1.2, score 1).
See the 10 indicators for Strategy & Vision
P2Governance & Regulation2.70 / 4Developing
Governance & Regulation scores 2.70, in the Developing tier, with 10 of 10 indicators scored. The Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023 is in place (G2.2, score 4), and the Nigeria Data Protection Commission works on automated decision-making rules under it (G2.3, score 4). The commission's staffing and budget score of 4 is retained but under second-edition review: the staffing figure in the evidence is garbled and the October 2026 check found no published headcount (G2.4). AI oversight is spread across the National Information Technology Development Agency, the National Centre for Artificial Intelligence and Robotics and the commission (G2.6, score 3). No standalone AI Act exists (G2.1, score 1), and intellectual property law does not address AI-generated content (G2.10, score 1).
See the 10 indicators for Governance & Regulation
P3Infrastructure & Data3.00 / 4Established
Infrastructure & Data scores 3.00, in the Established tier, with 9 of 10 indicators scored. The evidence records 26 operational data centres (I3.1, score 4) and 8 submarine cable systems (I3.3, score 4). Estimated combined capacity is between 65 MW and 86 MW of IT load, with planned projects expected to take national capacity over 400 MW (I3.2, score 3). Researchers can reach local high-performance computing clusters through the Nigeria AI Collective and the National Centre for Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Abuja (I3.6, score 3). Hyperscaler presence and data localisation provisions each score 2 (I3.5, I3.7). Foreign AI surveillance spending, recorded at over $470 million, is a context flag and is not scored (I3.9).
See the 10 indicators for Infrastructure & Data
P4Human Capital2.80 / 4Developing
Human Capital scores 2.80, in the Developing tier, with 10 of 10 indicators scored. Workforce training scores 4: the AI National Skills Initiative, run with Microsoft, had trained 350,000+ Nigerians in AI as of December 2025 (H4.7). School computing education and Nigerian language coverage also score 4; the government model N-ATLAS v1 supports Yoruba, Hausa and Igbo (H4.6, H4.10). The researcher score of 3 is retained but under second-edition review, because the figure of about 29 per million rests on 6,000 researchers of Nigerian descent worldwide, not researchers in Nigeria (H4.1). No AI staff numbers are given for the Nigeria Data Protection Commission (H4.2, score 1), and no AI patent figure is published (H4.5, score 1).
See the 10 indicators for Human Capital
P5Innovation & Ecosystem2.78 / 4Developing
Innovation & Ecosystem scores 2.78, in the Developing tier, with 9 of 10 indicators scored. University and industry partnerships score 4, with the evidence describing a move from memoranda to labs and deployable systems (N5.10). The AI Outlook 2026 report counts 122 operational AI startups, and other sources give counts from 50 to 300 (N5.1, score 3). The evidence lists 8 to 10 dedicated AI accelerators and incubators (N5.3, score 3). The National Regulatory Sandbox technical working group was inaugurated on 21 May 2026, and full legal backing awaits legislation (N5.4, score 2). Nigeria has 1 dedicated AI safety evaluation lab and no national red-teaming lab (N5.6, score 2). AI risk assessment frameworks are not scored (N5.9).
See the 10 indicators for Innovation & Ecosystem
P6Ethics & Inclusion3.50 / 4Established
Ethics & Inclusion scores 3.50, in the Established tier, with 10 of 10 indicators scored. The evidence grounds bias audit and transparency duties in the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023, the Nigeria AI Ethics Code 2024 and sectoral regulators (E6.2, E6.3). Citizens can file a complaint with the Nigeria Data Protection Commission within 6 months (E6.4). The strategy requires that at least 40% of programmes benefit women and underserved groups (E6.6), and sets a target of 70% of youth with AI skills by 2030 (E6.10). Section 69 of the 2023 Act gives the Federal High Court exclusive jurisdiction over commission cases (E6.5, score 3). Mandatory algorithmic impact assessments are not yet enacted law (E6.1, score 3).
See the 10 indicators for Ethics & Inclusion
P7Regional Integration3.20 / 4Established
Regional Integration scores 3.20, in the Established tier, with 10 of 10 indicators scored. African Union AI Strategy alignment scores 4 (R7.1). Nigeria signed the Africa Declaration on Artificial Intelligence in Kigali on 4 April 2025 and the Bletchley Declaration in November 2023 (R7.2, score 3; R7.4, score 4). The Electoral Act 2022 and the Cybercrimes Act 2015 can be applied to AI use in elections (R7.5, score 4). A 2022 Code of Practice requires platforms with more than 5M Nigerian users to register and to take down urgent content within 24 hours (R7.8, score 4). No single AI disinformation law exists (R7.6, score 2), and no public announcement confirms attendance at the Geneva Dialogue (R7.9, score 2).
See the 10 indicators for Regional Integration
P8Implementation & Impact2.00 / 4Developing
Implementation & Impact scores 2.00, in the Developing tier, with 9 of 10 indicators scored. Agriculture and financial services governance each score 4 (M8.6, M8.7). The Central Bank of Nigeria issued binding standards for automated anti-money-laundering systems on 10 March 2026. Budget disbursement scores 2: the evidence finds no single AI governance line item and records ₦225M disbursed to 45 research teams (M8.1). 1 AI or robotic health device is formally approved (M8.3, score 1), and no annual monitoring report series exists (M8.5, score 1). Nigeria has no public registry of government AI systems (M8.4, score 0) and has not formally adopted World Health Organization guidance (M8.10, score 0). Measurable outcomes are not scored (M8.9).
See the 10 indicators for Implementation & Impact