Africa AI Governance Index 2026 · Country profile on AI governance

Country Profile on AI Governance: Senegal

Senegal scores 1.27 out of 4 on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026. It sits in the Emerging tier and ranks 25 of 54 states.

Region
West Africa
Version
1.2 · 7 October 2026
Evidence reference date
30 June 2026
Overview

Senegal at a glance

How to read this profile

Indicator evidence in this factsheet comes from desk research in October 2026. Fellows have not verified it and it did not inform the score.

The Index is diagnostic. It measures formal governance instruments, not capability. Composite differences under about 0.1 are not meaningful.

Country

Population (2024)
18.5 million
Region
West Africa
Regional economic communities
Economic Community of West African States
Geography
Coastal, 5 international submarine cable systems in service

Governance status

  • National AI strategy S1.1

    Adoptednot scored

  • Data protection law G2.2

    Enforced with DPAnot scored

  • AI regulatory body G2.5

    Not determinednot scored

  • Malabo Convention ratification G2.7

    Ratifiednot scored

  • Kigali Declaration endorsement R7.2

    Endorsednot scored

Headline assessment

Senegal scores 1.27 out of 4 on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026. It sits in the Emerging tier and ranks 25 of 54 states. The eight pillar scores are fellow-assigned values from the Regional Summary. Indicators are not scored individually. The strongest pillars are Strategy & Vision and Regional Integration (2.00 each). The weakest is Governance & Regulation (0.70). The West Africa mean is 1.27. The mean for all 54 states is 1.33.

Strongest pillars
Strategy & Vision2.00 / 4DevelopingRegional Integration2.00 / 4Developing
Weakest pillar
Governance & Regulation0.70 / 4Nascent

Indicators scored: Pillar level only (fellow-assigned)

Pillar scores

Pillar scores at a glance

Each pillar is scored from 0 to 4. Senegal's eight pillar scores are fellow-assigned values; indicators are not scored individually.

Bar chart of Senegal's eight pillar scores out of 4, compared with the West Africa mean and the mean of all 54 states. The same figures are listed beside each bar and in the table below.
  • Senegal score
  • West Africa mean
  • All 54 states mean
  1. P1Strategy & Vision
    2.00Developing

    West Africa: 1.70
    All 54 states: 1.76

  2. P2Governance & Regulation
    0.70Nascent

    West Africa: 1.18
    All 54 states: 1.32

  3. P3Infrastructure & Data
    1.38Emerging

    West Africa: 1.40
    All 54 states: 1.51

  4. P4Human Capital
    1.12Emerging

    West Africa: 1.14
    All 54 states: 1.20

  5. P5Innovation & Ecosystem
    1.00Emerging

    West Africa: 1.04
    All 54 states: 1.05

  6. P6Ethics & Inclusion
    1.00Emerging

    West Africa: 1.21
    All 54 states: 1.26

  7. P7Regional Integration
    2.00Developing

    West Africa: 1.66
    All 54 states: 1.55

  8. P8Implementation & Impact
    0.89Nascent

    West Africa: 0.63
    All 54 states: 0.78

  9. Composite (weighted)
    1.27Emerging

    West Africa: 1.27
    All 54 states: 1.33

View the pillar scores as a table
Senegal pillar scores on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026
PillarBasisWeightScore (0–4)MaturityWest Africa meanAfrica mean
P1 Strategy & VisionFellow-assigned15%2.00Developing1.701.76
P2 Governance & RegulationFellow-assigned15%0.70Nascent1.181.32
P3 Infrastructure & DataFellow-assigned15%1.38Emerging1.401.51
P4 Human CapitalFellow-assigned15%1.12Emerging1.141.20
P5 Innovation & EcosystemFellow-assigned10%1.00Emerging1.041.05
P6 Ethics & InclusionFellow-assigned10%1.00Emerging1.211.26
P7 Regional IntegrationFellow-assigned10%2.00Developing1.661.55
P8 Implementation & ImpactFellow-assigned10%0.89Nascent0.630.78
Composite (weighted)—100%1.27Emerging1.271.33
Country report

What the scores say about Senegal

Senegal scores 1.27 out of 4 on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026, in the Emerging tier, and ranks 25 of 54. The eight pillar scores are fellow-assigned values from the Regional Summary, and indicators are not scored. The strongest pillars are Strategy & Vision and Regional Integration at 2.00 each, and the weakest is Governance & Regulation at 0.70. The composite equals the West Africa mean of 1.27; the Africa mean is 1.33. Desk research in October 2026, which fellows have not verified and which did not inform the scores, found a national AI strategy published in 2023, a 2008 data protection law still in force, and no AI-specific law or dedicated AI governance body.

P1Strategy & Vision2.00 / 4Developing

Strategy & Vision scores 2.00, in the Developing tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found a national AI strategy and roadmap published in 2023, with implementation started in 2024 (S1.1, evidence found). The formal adoption month is not determined: sources give 27 September 2023 and January 2024 (S1.2). The strategy sets 4 objectives, 6 orientations and 52 actions across agriculture, health, education, digital economy and the public sector (S1.7). A single unverified report states that 7 billion FCFA (USD 11.9 m) was allocated over two years (S1.4). OECD.AI records that no evaluation has been conducted (S1.9). Alignment with the African Union Continental AI Strategy and a review schedule are not determined (S1.5, S1.10).

See the 10 indicators for Strategy & Vision

P2Governance & Regulation0.70 / 4Nascent

Governance & Regulation scores 0.70, in the Nascent tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found that Law No. 2008-12 of 25 January 2008 on personal data protection is in force and enforced by the Commission des Donnees Personnelles (G2.2, evidence found). The commission issued a communique on AI use on 8 October 2025, but holds no statutory AI mandate (G2.3). The African Union status list dated 2 February 2026 records Malabo Convention ratification on 3 August 2016 and deposit on 16 August 2016 (G2.7). No AI-specific bill or law was identified (G2.1, not determined). A dedicated AI governance body, enforcement actions and a review of intellectual property law are also not determined (G2.5, G2.8, G2.10).

See the 10 indicators for Governance & Regulation

P3Infrastructure & Data1.38 / 4Emerging

Infrastructure & Data scores 1.38, in the Emerging tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found 7 data centre facilities listed in a self-reported directory (I3.1, evidence found) and 5 international cable systems landing at Dakar (I3.3). A national supercomputer of 537.6 teraflops entered service on 11 March 2024; its director said on 5 June 2026 that the GPU cell is intermittently down because of power instability (I3.6). The national data centre at Diamniadio was inaugurated on 22 June 2021 (I3.10). Hyperscaler presence is a confirmed absence: no cloud region or local zone was listed (I3.5). National data centre capacity, international bandwidth and a data localisation mandate are not determined (I3.2, I3.4, I3.7).

See the 10 indicators for Infrastructure & Data

P4Human Capital1.12 / 4Emerging

Human Capital scores 1.12, in the Emerging tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found 65 AI scholarly publications for 2024 and 71 for 2023 in the CSET series (H4.4, evidence found). The Ministry of National Education launched a continuing-training programme on AI use for 105,000 teachers and education staff on 30 September 2025 (H4.7). Wolof is supported and Pulaar is partly supported; Serer, Joola, Mandinka and Soninke are not listed (H4.10). Seven indicators are not determined: AI researchers per million (H4.1), AI skills among data protection staff (H4.2), university AI programmes (H4.3), AI patents (H4.5), school computer science curriculum status (H4.6), a labour transition framework (H4.8) and an informal economy assessment (H4.9).

See the 10 indicators for Human Capital

P5Innovation & Ecosystem1.00 / 4Emerging

Innovation & Ecosystem scores 1.00, in the Emerging tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found three items of evidence. A proxy figure, not specific to AI, records US$84M in 2025 technology equity funding across 10 deals (N5.2). The standards body ASN is an observing member of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42, the committee that developed ISO/IEC 42001; no national adoption was found (N5.7, N5.8). Seven indicators are not determined. It established no count of AI companies (N5.1) or AI-focused incubators (N5.3). It identified no regulatory sandbox (N5.4), no procurement rule favouring domestic AI developers (N5.5), no AI safety evaluation facility (N5.6), no AI risk assessment framework (N5.9) and no university and industry AI partnership (N5.10).

See the 10 indicators for Innovation & Ecosystem

P6Ethics & Inclusion1.00 / 4Emerging

Ethics & Inclusion scores 1.00, in the Emerging tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found that Law 2008-12 gives a right not to be subject to decisions based solely on automated processing, and that the Commission des Donnees Personnelles handles complaints (E6.3, E6.4, evidence found). Senegal is listed among members of the Global Partnership on AI and signed the Paris AI Action Summit statement of 11 February 2025 (E6.7). Bias audit requirements are a confirmed absence (E6.2). Five indicators are not determined: algorithmic impact assessment (E6.1), court cases on AI (E6.5), a national AI advisory body (E6.6), reference to African ethical principles (E6.9) and a youth participation mechanism (E6.10).

See the 10 indicators for Ethics & Inclusion

P7Regional Integration2.00 / 4Developing

Regional Integration scores 2.00, in the Developing tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found Senegal on the official signatory list of the Africa Declaration on Artificial Intelligence, done at Kigali on 4 April 2025 (R7.1, R7.2, evidence found). Senegal is a member of the Economic Community of West African States, where a regional AI framework remains at proposal stage (R7.3). It delivered a national statement at the United Nations Global Dialogue on AI Governance in Geneva on 6 to 7 July 2026 (R7.9) and endorsed the New Delhi AI Impact Summit Declaration of 20 February 2026 (R7.10). Cross-border AI agreements, election provisions, a disinformation framework and platform engagement are not determined (R7.4, R7.5, R7.6, R7.8).

See the 10 indicators for Regional Integration

P8Implementation & Impact0.89 / 4Nascent

Implementation & Impact scores 0.89, in the Nascent tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found one item of evidence: the Education Minister signed a ministerial note launching AI integration in the education system (M8.8). Monitoring reports are a confirmed absence: OECD.AI states that the national AI strategy has not been evaluated (M8.5). Eight indicators are not determined. Budget figures found are allocations, not disbursements, with no AI-specific line (M8.1). No health-specific AI regulation, approved AI health devices or government AI registry were found (M8.2, M8.3, M8.4). No agriculture provisions or central bank AI guidance were located (M8.6, M8.7). Protective outcomes and World Health Organization guidance adoption are also not determined (M8.9, M8.10).

See the 10 indicators for Implementation & Impact

Indicator evidence

Evidence by pillar

Desk-research evidence for each indicator, with sources. Where an indicator is marked “Not determined”, the research could not establish a finding. The Index method excludes such indicators from scoring rather than scoring them as absent.

P1 · Weight 15% of composite

Strategy & Vision

2.00 / 4Developing

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. West Africa mean 1.70 · all 54 states mean 1.76.

10 indicators: 7 evidence found, 0 confirmed absence, 3 not determined.

  1. S1.1

    National AI strategy existence

    Evidence found

    Adopted: The 'Strategie nationale et feuille de route du Senegal sur l'Intelligence Artificielle' (MCTEN) was published in 2023, with implementation started in 2024 according to OECD.AI. Implementation steps include a Meta AI-compute partnership (Sep 2024) and a 'Senegal AI Factory' presented in Aug 2026.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)capacity4dev.europa.eu (opens in a new tab)wearetech.africa (opens in a new tab)

  2. S1.2

    Strategy adoption date

    Not determined

    Formal adoption month not established: AU-EU D4D Hub reported the strategy being unveiled in a 27 Sep 2023 post, while a Sep 2024 report says it was presented in Jan 2024 by then-President Macky Sall. OECD.AI dates publication to 2023.

    Sources capacity4dev.europa.eu (opens in a new tab)wearetech.africa (opens in a new tab)oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  3. S1.3

    Political commitment signals

    Evidence found

    Institutional action: The strategy was presented by then-President Macky Sall and is steered by the Ministry of Communication, Telecommunications and Digital Economy (Minister Alioune Sall from 2024). President Faye's New Deal Technologique (launched 24 Feb 2025) commits to integrating AI into an 'administration augmentee'.

    Sources wearetech.africa (opens in a new tab)africacheck.org (opens in a new tab)

  4. S1.4

    Dedicated AI budget allocation

    Evidence found

    Multi-year allocation: A Sep 2024 report states 7 billion FCFA (USD 11.9 m) was allocated to the AI strategy over two years (single source, unverified against budget law). The broader New Deal Technologique digital programme is budgeted at 1,105 billion FCFA to 2034.

    Sources wearetech.africa (opens in a new tab)africacheck.org (opens in a new tab)

  5. S1.5

    AU Continental AI Strategy alignment

    Not determined

    The 2023 strategy predates the AU Continental AI Strategy (Jul 2024); no alignment assessment found.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  6. S1.6

    Multi-stakeholder consultation

    Evidence found

    Formal consultation: The draft went through review phases in Jun-Jul 2023 with AI service providers, consumers, education institutions, funders and government via workshops (Team Europe/D4D support). OECD.AI records expert, stakeholder and public consultations.

    Sources capacity4dev.europa.eu (opens in a new tab)oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  7. S1.7

    Sector prioritisation

    Evidence found

    Generic: Target sectors are agriculture, health, education, digital economy and public sector, with 4 objectives, 6 orientations and 52 actions and a cross-cutting target of training about 90,000 people in data science/AI by 2028. Sector-specific targets were not verified.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  8. S1.8

    Implementation roadmap

    Evidence found

    Phased plan: The strategy includes a roadmap with dated elements, e.g. a national AI cluster by end-2025, a national AI research institute, data lake, governance body, ethics committee and regulatory sandboxes, through 2028.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  9. S1.9

    Monitoring and evaluation framework

    Evidence found

    Planned: Action plans include evaluation for continuous improvement (D4D Hub, Sep 2023), but OECD.AI records that no evaluation has been conducted and results are not public.

    Sources capacity4dev.europa.eu (opens in a new tab)oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  10. S1.10

    Strategy review mechanism

    Not determined

    Reference to 'continuous improvement' only; no defined review schedule found.

    Sources capacity4dev.europa.eu (opens in a new tab)

P2 · Weight 15% of composite

Governance & Regulation

0.70 / 4Nascent

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. West Africa mean 1.18 · all 54 states mean 1.32.

10 indicators: 4 evidence found, 0 confirmed absence, 6 not determined.

  1. G2.1

    AI-specific legislation

    Not determined

    No AI-specific bill or law was identified. On 27 March 2026 a cybersecurity and AI governance expert told APS that Law 2008-12 has become outdated given generative AI and must be modernised.

    Sources fr.allafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

  2. G2.2

    Data protection law status

    Evidence found

    Enforced with DPA: Law No. 2008-12 of 25 January 2008 on personal data protection is in force and is enforced by the Commission des Donnees Personnelles (CDP). A 2019 replacement bill was published for comment in 2020 but had not progressed, and the 2008 law remained the governing text in March 2026.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)fr.allafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. G2.3

    DPA AI mandate

    Evidence found

    Informal AI engagement: On 8 October 2025 the CDP issued a communique on the use of AI, warning about AI-generated videos and images of public figures circulating on social networks and recalling data protection principles. This is informal engagement; no statutory AI mandate exists under Law 2008-12.

    Sources osiris.sn (opens in a new tab)

  4. G2.4

    DPA staffing and budget

    Not determined

    Published DPA staff count and annual budget were not located in this desk review (October 2026). dataprotection.africa (May 2022) records 11 CDP members with maximum terms of 8 years.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)

  5. G2.5

    AI regulatory body existence

    Not determined

    No dedicated AI governance body for Senegal was confirmed in this review.

  6. G2.6

    Institutional design model

    Not determined

    No source reviewed defines Senegal's regulatory model for AI; the CDP is the only regulator found engaging on AI (October 2025).

    Sources osiris.sn (opens in a new tab)

  7. G2.7

    Malabo Convention ratification

    Evidence found

    Ratified: The AU official status list dated 02/02/2026 records for Senegal: no separate signature date, ratification/accession on 03/08/2016 and deposit on 16/08/2016. No evidence of a domestic implementation programme specific to the Convention was assessed, so 'Ratified' rather than 'Implementing' is recorded.

    Sources au.int (opens in a new tab)au.int (2) (opens in a new tab)

  8. G2.8

    Enforcement actions taken

    Not determined

    No AI-related enforcement action (investigation, fine or order concerning AI or automated processing) was located in this desk review (October 2026); absence is not confirmed because DPA decision registers were not accessible.

  9. G2.9

    Extraterritorial provisions

    Evidence found

    Partial coverage: dataprotection.africa (May 2022) records that Law 2008-12 applies to foreign entities, excluding data in transit only. Coverage is via data protection law; no AI-specific extraterritorial clause was found.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)

  10. G2.10

    IP framework for AI

    Not determined

    No evidence of a review of intellectual property legislation for AI-generated content was located in this desk review (October 2026); IP-specific searches could not be completed, so absence is not confirmed.

P3 · Weight 15% of composite

Infrastructure & Data

1.38 / 4Emerging

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. West Africa mean 1.40 · all 54 states mean 1.51.

10 indicators: 6 evidence found, 1 confirmed absence, 3 not determined.

  1. I3.1

    Data center count

    Evidence found

    Data Center Map's Africa directory (page undated; accessed 2026-10-06) lists 7 data centre facility(ies) in Senegal, out of 261 listed across 43 African countries. The directory is self-reported by operators and may include some non-colocation facilities.

    Sources datacentermap.com (opens in a new tab)

  2. I3.2

    Data center capacity (MW)

    Not determined

    Osiris (28 May 2025) reports the state Diamniadio data centre at 1.4 MW and Sonatel's Tier III data centre at 3 halls of 750 kW each (about 2.25 MW). These two facility figures sum to about 3.65 MW but are not a national total; Data Center Map lists 7 facilities.

    Sources osiris.sn (opens in a new tab)datacentermap.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. I3.3

    Submarine cable landing points

    Evidence found

    TeleGeography Submarine Cable Map data (accessed 2026-10-06) lists 1 landing point(s) in Senegal served by at least one in-service international cable (Dakar), carrying 5 distinct international cable systems: 2Africa, ACE, MainOne, SAT-3/WASC, SHARE.

    Sources submarinecablemap.com (opens in a new tab)submarinecablemap.com (2) (opens in a new tab)

  4. I3.4

    International bandwidth (Gbps)

    Not determined

    No dated national international-bandwidth figure for Senegal was verified. ITU DataHub (indicator: international bandwidth usage) returned HTTP 403 and robots-disallowed errors on 2026-10-06, and searches of the regulator and press found no usable national figure in this pass.

  5. I3.5

    Hyperscaler presence

    Confirmed absence

    None: Official region lists checked on 2026-10-06 show no cloud region, availability zone or local/edge zone in Senegal: AWS (Africa region Cape Town only; local zones Johannesburg and Nairobi), Azure (South Africa North/West only), Google Cloud (africa-south1 Johannesburg only), Oracle (Johannesburg and Casablanca live; Kenya coming soon) and Alibaba (no African region). Huawei Cloud's African regions are Johannesburg and Cairo (May 2024), but this rests on press coverage because Huawei's own region page could not be machine-read.

    Sources aws.amazon.com (opens in a new tab)aws.amazon.com (2) (opens in a new tab)learn.microsoft.com (opens in a new tab)

  6. I3.6

    GPU/HPC access

    Evidence found

    National facility: Senegal's national supercomputer (Taouey, 537.6 teraflops, Atos) at Diamniadio was put into service on 11 Mar 2024 under CINERI, the national higher-education and research cyber-infrastructure. In a 5 Jun 2026 interview the CINERI director said it is operational but not at 100%: its GPU cell is intermittently down because of power instability.

    Sources osiris.sn (opens in a new tab)osiris.sn (2) (opens in a new tab)

  7. I3.7

    Data localisation provisions

    Not determined

    Act No. 2008-12 conditions transfers on adequate protection (DLA Piper, accessed 2026-10-06). No explicit in-country storage mandate was verified in this pass.

    Sources dlapiperdataprotection.com (opens in a new tab)

  8. I3.8

    Cross-border data flow framework

    Evidence found

    Comprehensive: DLA Piper Data Protection Laws of the World (accessed 2026-10-06): Act No. 2008-12 prohibits transfers unless the receiving country provides sufficient protection; members of the francophone association of DPAs (AFAPDP) are deemed adequate and others are assessed case by case, with listed derogations.

    Sources dlapiperdataprotection.com (opens in a new tab)

  9. I3.9

    Foreign AI surveillance spending

    Evidence found

    IDS/ADRN, Smart City Surveillance in Africa (March 2026), Table 2 puts the total cost of Senegal's safe city project by 2025 at US$167m (about 500 smart cameras, China-supplied). The report quotes the former ADIE director that the first Smart Senegal phase was financed by a US$150m Chinese concessional loan (2019).

    Sources ids.ac.uk (opens in a new tab)

  10. I3.10

    Sovereign cloud initiatives

    Evidence found

    Operational: Senegal's national data centre at Diamniadio, built by the State IT agency ADIE (now Sénégal Numérique SA), was inaugurated on 22 Jun 2021 to host state data in the name of digital sovereignty (CIO Mag, 23 Jun 2021). Osiris (28 May 2025) reports about 1,000 m2 of technical rooms and 1.4 MW of power.

    Sources cio-mag.com (opens in a new tab)osiris.sn (opens in a new tab)

P4 · Weight 15% of composite

Human Capital

1.12 / 4Emerging

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. West Africa mean 1.14 · all 54 states mean 1.20.

10 indicators: 3 evidence found, 0 confirmed absence, 7 not determined.

  1. H4.1

    AI researchers per million

    Not determined

    No consistent cross-country source of AI-specific researchers per million was found or could be queried for this country as of Oct 2026 (the planned OpenAlex author query was blocked by an API rate limit on 2026-10-06). Context only: UNESCO UIS via World Bank indicator SP.POP.SCIE.RD.P6 reports 572.4 total R&D researchers (all fields, FTE) per million people in 2015; this is not an AI-specific figure.

    Sources api.worldbank.org (opens in a new tab)

  2. H4.2

    DPA staff with AI competency

    Not determined

    No published source was found on the number of data protection authority staff with demonstrable AI technical skills as of Oct 2026; DPA annual reports were not located within the research budget of this pass.

  3. H4.3

    University AI programs

    Not determined

    No national count found. OSIRIS (13 Apr 2025) reports that 25 lecturers from UGB, UCAD, UAM, USSEIN, UASZ, UIDT, EPT and others who are 'already engaged in teaching AI' were trained at an AI researcher school under the Sen Hub IA project; this does not establish AI/ML degree programmes.

    Sources osiris.sn (opens in a new tab)

  4. H4.4

    African-authored AI publications

    Evidence found

    CSET Country Activity Tracker (Merged Academic Corpus) via Our World in Data, series 'AI scholarly publications - Field: All', entity Senegal (SEN), reference year 2024: 65 publications (2023: 71). Counts articles with at least one author at an institution in the country, English title/abstract only; dataset last updated 27 Apr 2026. OpenAlex could not be used because the API was rate-limited on 2026-10-06.

    Data note: CSET/OWID AI publications 2022–24: 42, 71, 65.

    Sources ourworldindata.org (opens in a new tab)ourworldindata.org (2) (opens in a new tab)

  5. H4.5

    AI patents filed

    Not determined

    No country-level count of AI-related domestic patent filings was retrieved as of Oct 2026. WIPO IP Statistics and national IP office data were not accessible in this pass, and no published AI-patent figure for this country was found.

  6. H4.6

    K-12 CS education

    Not determined

    Under the Education Digital Strategy 2025-2029, the Ministry of Education launched AI and digital training for teachers on 30 Sep 2025 and distributed computers to science-stream students (Le Soleil). No source states a K-12 computer science curriculum status.

    Sources lesoleil.sn (opens in a new tab)

  7. H4.7

    AI workforce training programs

    Evidence found

    At scale: The Ministry of National Education launched a national continuing-training programme on AI use for 105,000 teachers and education staff on 30 Sep 2025. It is delivered with the Université numérique Cheikh Hamidou Kane (FORCE-N) and the Mastercard Foundation under the Education Digital Strategy 2025-2029. Scope is the education workforce only.

    Sources osiris.sn (opens in a new tab)lesoleil.sn (opens in a new tab)

  8. H4.8

    Labour transition policy

    Not determined

    No government framework on AI and labour-market transition (adopted, draft or under discussion) was found for this country in the sources opened in this pass (Oct 2026).

  9. H4.9

    Informal economy AI assessment

    Not determined

    No government assessment of AI's impact on the informal economy was found for this country in the sources opened in this pass (Oct 2026).

  10. H4.10

    African language NLP coverage

    Evidence found

    Count of domestic non-European languages in Meta NLLB-200/FLORES-200 or Google Translate (Cloud Translation list accessed Oct 2026; Jun 2024 expansion), mapped by the researcher. Supported: Wolof (NLLB wol_Latn; Google, Jun 2024) and Pulaar (partial, via NLLB Nigerian Fulfulde fuv_Latn and Google Fulfulde). Serer, Joola, Mandinka and Soninke are not listed.

    Sources raw.githubusercontent.com (opens in a new tab)cloud.google.com (opens in a new tab)blog.google (opens in a new tab)

P5 · Weight 10% of composite

Innovation & Ecosystem

1.00 / 4Emerging

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. West Africa mean 1.04 · all 54 states mean 1.05.

10 indicators: 3 evidence found, 0 confirmed absence, 7 not determined.

  1. N5.1

    AI companies count

    Not determined

    TechBehemoths AI-services page for Senegal returned HTTP 403 (Oct 2026); its general Senegal page lists only 2 IT companies across all services, so the directory gives no usable AI count (upper bound 2 is uninformative).

    Sources techbehemoths.com (opens in a new tab)techbehemoths.com (2) (opens in a new tab)

  2. N5.2

    Private AI investment (USD)

    Evidence found

    PROXY, not AI-specific: Partech Africa 2025 report (22 Jan 2026) records US$84M in 2025 tech equity funding for Senegal (+137% YoY) across 10 deals. No AI-specific figure published.

    Sources cdn-website.partechpartners.com (opens in a new tab)partechpartners.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. N5.3

    AI incubators/accelerators

    Not determined

    No AI-focused incubator or accelerator count established from an opened source in this pass (general tech hubs not counted).

  4. N5.4

    Regulatory sandbox (AI)

    Not determined

    No fintech or other regulatory sandbox for this country appears in the Open Bank Project Africa sandbox list (updated to early 2026). No AI-specific sandbox was identified; the Datasphere Initiative 2025 inventory found AI-specific sandboxes in Africa still nascent.

    Sources openbankproject.com (opens in a new tab)thedatasphere.org (opens in a new tab)

  5. N5.5

    Government AI procurement

    Not determined

    No evidence located on government procurement of AI from domestic developers (no AI-specific procurement rule or preference policy found in sources opened).

  6. N5.6

    AI safety evaluation capacity

    Not determined

    No AI safety testing or evaluation facility (academic, government or accredited) identified in sources opened.

  7. N5.7

    ISO/IEC 42001 adoption

    Evidence found

    Aware: Senegal's standards body ASN is an observing (O) member of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 (list dated Oct 2026), the committee that developed ISO/IEC 42001, so the standard is known at standards-body level. No 42001 certification of an organisation in the country and no national adoption was found.

    Sources iso.org (opens in a new tab)

  8. N5.8

    Standards body AI competency

    Evidence found

    AI working group: ASN is one of 24 observing (O) members of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 Artificial intelligence (list dated Oct 2026): it follows AI standardisation but has no voting role. No dedicated national AI technical committee was verified; mapping O-membership to 'AI working group' is a coder judgement.

    Sources iso.org (opens in a new tab)

  9. N5.9

    AI risk assessment frameworks

    Not determined

    No sector-specific or cross-sector AI risk assessment framework identified in sources opened.

  10. N5.10

    University-industry AI partnerships

    Not determined

    No formal university-industry AI research partnership identified in sources opened.

P6 · Weight 10% of composite

Ethics & Inclusion

1.00 / 4Emerging

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. West Africa mean 1.21 · all 54 states mean 1.26.

10 indicators: 4 evidence found, 1 confirmed absence, 5 not determined.

  1. E6.1

    Algorithmic impact assessment

    Not determined

    GIRAI 2026 scores Senegal 65.9 on impact assessments based on one framework, the AI Development Strategy (2023), but the strategy is a non-binding policy and Law 2008-12 contains no DPIA duty per DLA Piper (Mar 2026). Whether the strategy's provision amounts to voluntary guidance could not be verified from the strategy text.

    Sources global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)dlapiperdataprotection.com (opens in a new tab)

  2. E6.2

    Bias audit requirements

    Confirmed absence

    None: GIRAI 2026 records no framework or initiative on fairness and non-discrimination for Senegal (indicator score 0), and no AI-specific law requiring bias audits was found as of Oct 2026.

    Sources global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)

  3. E6.3

    Transparency obligations

    Evidence found

    Sector-specific: Law 2008-12 gives a right not to be subject to decisions based solely on automated processing (dataprotection.africa narrative, May 2022), a binding but data-protection-limited safeguard. GIRAI 2026 scores Senegal 63.6 on transparency and explainability based on the AI Development Strategy (2023), a non-binding policy; no AI-specific transparency law was found.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)

  4. E6.4

    Citizen redress mechanism

    Evidence found

    DPA complaint: Law 2008-12 (25 Jan 2008) gives data subjects the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing producing adverse legal effects (dataprotection.africa narrative, May 2022; a WIPO Lex summary places it in Article 48, not verified against the full text), and the Commission des Donnees Personnelles (CDP) handles complaints. dataprotection.africa's summary table contradicts its own narrative by marking the right 'No'.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)wipo.int (opens in a new tab)osiris.sn (opens in a new tab)

  5. E6.5

    Judicial AI remedy

    Not determined

    No court case on algorithms, AI or solely automated decisions was found for Senegal in sources opened as of Oct 2026 (data protection trackers, GIRAI 2026 access-to-redress indicator); ordinary courts have general jurisdiction, but the absence of precedent is not confirmed by an authoritative source.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)

  6. E6.6

    AI advisory body diversity

    Not determined

    No national AI advisory body for Senegal was located in sources opened as of Oct 2026, so composition and diversity cannot be assessed; absence is not confirmed by an authoritative source.

    Sources global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)

  7. E6.7

    Global AI governance participation

    Evidence found

    Active member: Senegal is listed among GPAI members on the OECD.AI GPAI page (accessed Oct 2026), the only one of these 18 countries on that list. It also signed the Paris AI Action Summit statement (11 Feb 2025) and endorsed the New Delhi AI Impact Summit Declaration (20 Feb 2026).

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)elysee.fr (opens in a new tab)digitalpolicyalert.org (opens in a new tab)

  8. E6.8

    Civil society AI engagement

    Evidence found

    Ad hoc consultation: The strategy's four objectives were 'expressed by public, private and associative stakeholders during the collective-intelligence process organised by the MCTEN' (synthesis document quoted by Osiris, Jan 2024). GIRAI 2026 scores Senegal 30 on government mechanisms for CSO inclusion; no formal advisory role was found.

    Sources osiris.sn (opens in a new tab)global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)

  9. E6.9

    African ethical framework reference

    Not determined

    The strategy's guiding lines speak of AI 'exemplary in Africa', 'national and territorial cohesion' and 'ethical, responsible and trustworthy' AI (Osiris, Jan 2024); no reference to Ubuntu or African ethical principles was found, but only the synthesis was reviewed.

    Sources osiris.sn (opens in a new tab)

  10. E6.10

    Youth participation

    Not determined

    The strategy's first guideline makes AI a field of training for young Senegalese and an objective is youth employment (Osiris, Jan 2024), but no formal youth participation mechanism in AI governance was found.

    Sources osiris.sn (opens in a new tab)

P7 · Weight 10% of composite

Regional Integration

2.00 / 4Developing

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. West Africa mean 1.66 · all 54 states mean 1.55.

10 indicators: 6 evidence found, 0 confirmed absence, 4 not determined.

  1. R7.1

    AU AI Strategy alignment

    Evidence found

    Awareness: Senegal is a signatory of the Africa Declaration on AI (Kigali, 4 April 2025), which in clause 3.6.1 commits signatories to support national AI policies and governance frameworks aligned with the AU Continental AI Strategy; no country-specific formal alignment process was found in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

    Sources c4ir.rw (opens in a new tab)

  2. R7.2

    Kigali Declaration endorsement

    Evidence found

    Endorsed: Senegal appears on the official signatory list of the Africa Declaration on Artificial Intelligence, done at Kigali on 4 April 2025 (C4IR Rwanda PDF created 5 April 2025; list of AU, Smart Africa and 52 states). No evidence of a national implementation step specifically citing the Declaration was found as of Oct 2026.

    Sources c4ir.rw (opens in a new tab)aiexpoafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. R7.3

    REC AI governance coordination

    Evidence found

    Active participant: Senegal is an ECOWAS member (founding 1975). At an ECOWAS Parliament delocalised committee meeting in Dakar (July 2025) on a regional AI legal and educational framework, Senegal's Education Minister proposed a West African Pact on AI use in education; the ECOWAS framework remains at proposal stage.

    Sources gazettengr.com (opens in a new tab)en.wikipedia.org (opens in a new tab)

  4. R7.4

    Cross-border AI agreements

    Not determined

    No bilateral or multilateral AI governance cooperation agreement involving Senegal was found in sources opened as of Oct 2026; non-binding declarations (Kigali 2025 and, where applicable, Paris 2025 or New Delhi 2026) are recorded under R7.2 and R7.10.

  5. R7.5

    Election integrity AI provisions

    Not determined

    No legal or institutional provision addressing AI in elections was found for Senegal in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

  6. R7.6

    Disinformation response framework

    Not determined

    No government framework for responding to AI-generated disinformation was found for Senegal in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

  7. R7.7

    AI election incidents documented

    Evidence found

    One documented incident: after the March 2024 presidential election, a viral video presented as President Faye was actually 2021 footage of Ousmane Sonko with English audio; a Dec 2024 FNF analysis says fact-checkers verified generative AI was used for the translation, while Africa Check (12 Apr 2024) described it only as voice-dubbed.

    Sources freiheit.org (opens in a new tab)africacheck.org (opens in a new tab)

  8. R7.8

    Platform content moderation

    Not determined

    No government engagement with platforms on AI content moderation was found for Senegal in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

  9. R7.9

    Geneva Dialogue participation

    Evidence found

    Active contributor: Senegal delivered a national statement at the inaugural UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance (Geneva, 6-7 July 2026), per the UN list of statements from Member States and Observers.

    Sources un.org (opens in a new tab)un.org (2) (opens in a new tab)

  10. R7.10

    G20/multilateral AI engagement

    Evidence found

    Active participant: Senegal signed the Paris AI Action Summit Statement on Inclusive and Sustainable AI (11 Feb 2025); is among the 87 initial endorsers of the New Delhi AI Impact Summit Declaration (20 Feb 2026); is a member of the Global Partnership on AI (GPAI).

    Sources elysee.fr (opens in a new tab)digitalpolicyalert.org (opens in a new tab)en.wikipedia.org (opens in a new tab)

P8 · Weight 10% of composite

Implementation & Impact

0.89 / 4Nascent

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. West Africa mean 0.63 · all 54 states mean 0.78.

10 indicators: 1 evidence found, 1 confirmed absence, 8 not determined.

  1. M8.1

    AI governance budget disbursed

    Not determined

    The New Deal Technologique totals CFA 1,105 bn (~USD 1.7 bn), with CFA 950 bn reported 'secured' (Feb 2025), and the 2026 digital ministry budget is CFA 81.06 bn (~USD 143.9 m, Dec 2025). These are allocations, not disbursements, and no AI-specific line was given. A CFA 59 m AI start-up seed fund was announced in Oct 2024 but not yet disbursed.

    Sources ecofinagency.com (opens in a new tab)ecofinagency.com (2) (opens in a new tab)wearetech.africa (opens in a new tab)

  2. M8.2

    Health AI regulation

    Not determined

    The National AI Strategy and Road Map (2023, to 2028) targets health, but no health-specific AI regulation was found.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  3. M8.3

    Health AI devices approved

    Not determined

    No data was found on approved AI health devices.

  4. M8.4

    Government AI system registry

    Not determined

    No government AI registry was found. The strategy plans a sectoral public/private 'data lake', which is not an AI-system registry.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  5. M8.5

    AI governance M&E reports

    Confirmed absence

    OECD.AI (updated 28 Apr 2026) states the National AI Strategy 'has not been evaluated' and that evaluation results are not public.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  6. M8.6

    Agriculture AI governance

    Not determined

    Agriculture is a target sector of the AI strategy, but no agriculture-specific AI governance provisions were found.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  7. M8.7

    Financial services AI governance

    Not determined

    BCEAO hosted a May 2025 Dakar conference of African central banks on AI, but no BCEAO AI guidance, circular or instruction for WAEMU was located; the article body was not retrievable.

    Sources financialafrik.com (opens in a new tab)

  8. M8.8

    Education AI governance

    Evidence found

    Policy adopted: Education Minister Moustapha Mamba Guirassy signed a ministerial note launching AI integration in the education system, with training for 105,000 educators (reported 18 Sep 2025). A National Charter of AI Ethics for education was still being developed.

    Sources guindima.sn (opens in a new tab)

  9. M8.9

    Measurable governance outcomes

    Not determined

    No documented AI-related protective outcome by the CDP was located in this pass.

  10. M8.10

    WHO AI health guidance adoption

    Not determined

    No country-specific adoption was found. WHO AFRO AI-for-health ethics workshops (2021, 47 countries; July 2023) do not list participants.

    Sources afro.who.int (opens in a new tab)

Method

What is the Africa AI Governance Index?

The Africa AI Governance Index 2026 assesses 8 pillars of national AI governance. Each pillar is examined through 10 indicators. The Index is diagnostic. It measures formal governance instruments, not capability. Composite differences under about 0.1 are not meaningful.

Indicator score key

Indicator score key, 0 to 4
ScoreDefinition
0 No evidenceNo policy, institution, or activity. Confirmed absence.
1 NascentInitial discussion, concept note, informal working group.
2 DevelopingDraft policy, institution forming, pilot, or formal consultation.
3 EstablishedAdopted policy or operational institution; limited enforcement.
4 AdvancedFully operational with enforcement and measurable outcomes.

Maturity tiers

Applied to pillar and composite means.

Maturity tiers by score range
TierMean score
NascentBelow 1.00
Emerging1.00 to 1.99
Developing2.00 to 2.99
Established3.00 and above

How scores are built

A pillar score is the mean of the scored indicators in that pillar. Confirmed absence scores 0. An indicator where nothing could be determined is excluded from the pillar mean and reported as not scored. A score with no supporting evidence is excluded.

The composite is 15% of each of pillars P1 to P4 plus 10% of each of pillars P5 to P8, on a scale of 0 to 4. In other words, P1, P2, P3, P4 carry 15% each and P5, P6, P7, P8 carry 10% each.

Source: Africa AI Governance Index 2026 Final Dataset, 54 countries, built 6 October 2026. Lawyers Hub, Africa AI Policy Lab. Version 1.2, 7 October 2026.

Suggested citation

Lawyers Hub, Africa AI Policy Lab (2026). Country Profile on AI Governance: Senegal. Africa AI Governance Index 2026, version 1.2, 7 October 2026. https://www.aipolicy.africa/country-profiles/senegal