Senegal scores 1.27 out of 4 on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026, in the Emerging tier, and ranks 25 of 54. The eight pillar scores are fellow-assigned values from the Regional Summary, and indicators are not scored. The strongest pillars are Strategy & Vision and Regional Integration at 2.00 each, and the weakest is Governance & Regulation at 0.70. The composite equals the West Africa mean of 1.27; the Africa mean is 1.33. Desk research in October 2026, which fellows have not verified and which did not inform the scores, found a national AI strategy published in 2023, a 2008 data protection law still in force, and no AI-specific law or dedicated AI governance body.
P1Strategy & Vision2.00 / 4Developing
Strategy & Vision scores 2.00, in the Developing tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found a national AI strategy and roadmap published in 2023, with implementation started in 2024 (S1.1, evidence found). The formal adoption month is not determined: sources give 27 September 2023 and January 2024 (S1.2). The strategy sets 4 objectives, 6 orientations and 52 actions across agriculture, health, education, digital economy and the public sector (S1.7). A single unverified report states that 7 billion FCFA (USD 11.9 m) was allocated over two years (S1.4). OECD.AI records that no evaluation has been conducted (S1.9). Alignment with the African Union Continental AI Strategy and a review schedule are not determined (S1.5, S1.10).
See the 10 indicators for Strategy & Vision
P2Governance & Regulation0.70 / 4Nascent
Governance & Regulation scores 0.70, in the Nascent tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found that Law No. 2008-12 of 25 January 2008 on personal data protection is in force and enforced by the Commission des Donnees Personnelles (G2.2, evidence found). The commission issued a communique on AI use on 8 October 2025, but holds no statutory AI mandate (G2.3). The African Union status list dated 2 February 2026 records Malabo Convention ratification on 3 August 2016 and deposit on 16 August 2016 (G2.7). No AI-specific bill or law was identified (G2.1, not determined). A dedicated AI governance body, enforcement actions and a review of intellectual property law are also not determined (G2.5, G2.8, G2.10).
See the 10 indicators for Governance & Regulation
P3Infrastructure & Data1.38 / 4Emerging
Infrastructure & Data scores 1.38, in the Emerging tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found 7 data centre facilities listed in a self-reported directory (I3.1, evidence found) and 5 international cable systems landing at Dakar (I3.3). A national supercomputer of 537.6 teraflops entered service on 11 March 2024; its director said on 5 June 2026 that the GPU cell is intermittently down because of power instability (I3.6). The national data centre at Diamniadio was inaugurated on 22 June 2021 (I3.10). Hyperscaler presence is a confirmed absence: no cloud region or local zone was listed (I3.5). National data centre capacity, international bandwidth and a data localisation mandate are not determined (I3.2, I3.4, I3.7).
See the 10 indicators for Infrastructure & Data
P4Human Capital1.12 / 4Emerging
Human Capital scores 1.12, in the Emerging tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found 65 AI scholarly publications for 2024 and 71 for 2023 in the CSET series (H4.4, evidence found). The Ministry of National Education launched a continuing-training programme on AI use for 105,000 teachers and education staff on 30 September 2025 (H4.7). Wolof is supported and Pulaar is partly supported; Serer, Joola, Mandinka and Soninke are not listed (H4.10). Seven indicators are not determined: AI researchers per million (H4.1), AI skills among data protection staff (H4.2), university AI programmes (H4.3), AI patents (H4.5), school computer science curriculum status (H4.6), a labour transition framework (H4.8) and an informal economy assessment (H4.9).
See the 10 indicators for Human Capital
P5Innovation & Ecosystem1.00 / 4Emerging
Innovation & Ecosystem scores 1.00, in the Emerging tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found three items of evidence. A proxy figure, not specific to AI, records US$84M in 2025 technology equity funding across 10 deals (N5.2). The standards body ASN is an observing member of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42, the committee that developed ISO/IEC 42001; no national adoption was found (N5.7, N5.8). Seven indicators are not determined. It established no count of AI companies (N5.1) or AI-focused incubators (N5.3). It identified no regulatory sandbox (N5.4), no procurement rule favouring domestic AI developers (N5.5), no AI safety evaluation facility (N5.6), no AI risk assessment framework (N5.9) and no university and industry AI partnership (N5.10).
See the 10 indicators for Innovation & Ecosystem
P6Ethics & Inclusion1.00 / 4Emerging
Ethics & Inclusion scores 1.00, in the Emerging tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found that Law 2008-12 gives a right not to be subject to decisions based solely on automated processing, and that the Commission des Donnees Personnelles handles complaints (E6.3, E6.4, evidence found). Senegal is listed among members of the Global Partnership on AI and signed the Paris AI Action Summit statement of 11 February 2025 (E6.7). Bias audit requirements are a confirmed absence (E6.2). Five indicators are not determined: algorithmic impact assessment (E6.1), court cases on AI (E6.5), a national AI advisory body (E6.6), reference to African ethical principles (E6.9) and a youth participation mechanism (E6.10).
See the 10 indicators for Ethics & Inclusion
P7Regional Integration2.00 / 4Developing
Regional Integration scores 2.00, in the Developing tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found Senegal on the official signatory list of the Africa Declaration on Artificial Intelligence, done at Kigali on 4 April 2025 (R7.1, R7.2, evidence found). Senegal is a member of the Economic Community of West African States, where a regional AI framework remains at proposal stage (R7.3). It delivered a national statement at the United Nations Global Dialogue on AI Governance in Geneva on 6 to 7 July 2026 (R7.9) and endorsed the New Delhi AI Impact Summit Declaration of 20 February 2026 (R7.10). Cross-border AI agreements, election provisions, a disinformation framework and platform engagement are not determined (R7.4, R7.5, R7.6, R7.8).
See the 10 indicators for Regional Integration
P8Implementation & Impact0.89 / 4Nascent
Implementation & Impact scores 0.89, in the Nascent tier, a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found one item of evidence: the Education Minister signed a ministerial note launching AI integration in the education system (M8.8). Monitoring reports are a confirmed absence: OECD.AI states that the national AI strategy has not been evaluated (M8.5). Eight indicators are not determined. Budget figures found are allocations, not disbursements, with no AI-specific line (M8.1). No health-specific AI regulation, approved AI health devices or government AI registry were found (M8.2, M8.3, M8.4). No agriculture provisions or central bank AI guidance were located (M8.6, M8.7). Protective outcomes and World Health Organization guidance adoption are also not determined (M8.9, M8.10).
See the 10 indicators for Implementation & Impact