Africa AI Governance Index 2026 · Country profile on AI governance

Country Profile on AI Governance: Namibia

Namibia scores 1.11 out of 4 on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026. It sits in the Emerging tier and ranks joint 29 of 54 states.

Region
Southern Africa
Version
1.2 · 7 October 2026
Evidence reference date
30 June 2026
Overview

Namibia at a glance

How to read this profile

Indicator evidence in this factsheet comes from desk research in October 2026. Fellows have not verified it and it did not inform the score.

The Index is diagnostic. It measures formal governance instruments, not capability. Composite differences under about 0.1 are not meaningful.

Country

Population (2024)
3.0 million
Region
Southern Africa
Regional economic communities
Southern African Development Community
Geography
Coastal, 2 international submarine cable systems in service

Governance status

  • National AI strategy S1.1

    Draftnot scored

  • Data protection law G2.2

    Draftnot scored

  • AI regulatory body G2.5

    Not determinednot scored

  • Malabo Convention ratification G2.7

    Ratifiednot scored

  • Kigali Declaration endorsement R7.2

    Endorsednot scored

Headline assessment

Namibia scores 1.11 out of 4 on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026. It sits in the Emerging tier and ranks joint 29 of 54 states. The eight pillar scores are fellow-assigned values from the Regional Summary. Indicators are not scored individually. The strongest pillar is Strategy & Vision (2.20). The weakest is Implementation & Impact (0.30). The Southern Africa mean is 1.49. The mean for all 54 states is 1.33.

Strongest pillar
Strategy & Vision2.20 / 4Developing
Weakest pillar
Implementation & Impact0.30 / 4Nascent

Indicators scored: Pillar level only (fellow-assigned)

Pillar scores

Pillar scores at a glance

Each pillar is scored from 0 to 4. Namibia's eight pillar scores are fellow-assigned values; indicators are not scored individually.

Bar chart of Namibia's eight pillar scores out of 4, compared with the Southern Africa mean and the mean of all 54 states. The same figures are listed beside each bar and in the table below.
  • Namibia score
  • Southern Africa mean
  • All 54 states mean
  1. P1Strategy & Vision
    2.20Developing

    Southern Africa: 2.04
    All 54 states: 1.76

  2. P2Governance & Regulation
    1.20Emerging

    Southern Africa: 1.43
    All 54 states: 1.32

  3. P3Infrastructure & Data
    1.10Emerging

    Southern Africa: 1.77
    All 54 states: 1.51

  4. P4Human Capital
    1.00Emerging

    Southern Africa: 1.40
    All 54 states: 1.20

  5. P5Innovation & Ecosystem
    0.70Nascent

    Southern Africa: 1.16
    All 54 states: 1.05

  6. P6Ethics & Inclusion
    0.90Nascent

    Southern Africa: 1.48
    All 54 states: 1.26

  7. P7Regional Integration
    0.90Nascent

    Southern Africa: 1.62
    All 54 states: 1.55

  8. P8Implementation & Impact
    0.30Nascent

    Southern Africa: 0.70
    All 54 states: 0.78

  9. Composite (weighted)
    1.11Emerging

    Southern Africa: 1.49
    All 54 states: 1.33

View the pillar scores as a table
Namibia pillar scores on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026
PillarBasisWeightScore (0–4)MaturitySouthern Africa meanAfrica mean
P1 Strategy & VisionFellow-assigned15%2.20Developing2.041.76
P2 Governance & RegulationFellow-assigned15%1.20Emerging1.431.32
P3 Infrastructure & DataFellow-assigned15%1.10Emerging1.771.51
P4 Human CapitalFellow-assigned15%1.00Emerging1.401.20
P5 Innovation & EcosystemFellow-assigned10%0.70Nascent1.161.05
P6 Ethics & InclusionFellow-assigned10%0.90Nascent1.481.26
P7 Regional IntegrationFellow-assigned10%0.90Nascent1.621.55
P8 Implementation & ImpactFellow-assigned10%0.30Nascent0.700.78
Composite (weighted)—100%1.11Emerging1.491.33
Country report

What the scores say about Namibia

Namibia scores 1.11 out of 4 on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026, which places it in the Emerging tier at joint rank 29 of 54. The eight pillar scores are fellow-assigned values from the Regional Summary, and indicators are not scored. Strategy and Vision is the strongest pillar at 2.20 and Implementation and Impact is the weakest at 0.30. The composite sits below the Southern Africa mean of 1.49 and the Africa mean of 1.33. Desk research in October 2026, which fellows have not verified and which did not inform the scores, found a national AI strategy at validation stage without Cabinet approval, an AI Bill and a Data Protection Bill in draft, and no data protection authority.

P1Strategy & Vision2.20 / 4Developing

Strategy and Vision carries a fellow-assigned score of 2.20, in the Developing tier. Desk research in October 2026 found that the national AI strategy is a draft: on 27 September 2026 the NCRST chief executive said it had reached the synthesis and national validation stage (S1.1). An editor's check on 7 October 2026 found no Cabinet approval, and tracker entries that report an adopted strategy are wrong (S1.1, S1.2). ICT Minister Emma Theofelus launched the National AI Institute in September 2026 (S1.3). The draft drew on consultation with 215 local AI experts and stakeholders (S1.6). No AI budget figures were reported (S1.4). The strategy text is unpublished, so roadmap, monitoring and review were not determined (S1.8, S1.9, S1.10).

See the 10 indicators for Strategy & Vision

P2Governance & Regulation1.20 / 4Emerging

Governance and Regulation carries a fellow-assigned score of 1.20, in the Emerging tier. Desk research in October 2026 found that Namibia has no data protection law. The ICT Minister said the Data Protection Bill would be tabled in September 2025, and passage could not be confirmed as of October 2026 (G2.2). The research records a confirmed absence of a data protection authority (G2.3, G2.4). On 4 June 2025 the Speaker said Namibia was finalising a Draft Artificial Intelligence Bill, and no enactment was found (G2.1). The African Union status list records Malabo Convention ratification or accession on 25 January 2019 and deposit on 1 February 2019 (G2.7). An AI governance body and enforcement actions were not determined (G2.5, G2.8).

See the 10 indicators for Governance & Regulation

P3Infrastructure & Data1.10 / 4Emerging

Infrastructure and Data carries a fellow-assigned score of 1.10, in the Emerging tier. Desk research in October 2026 found 2 data centre facilities listed by Data Center Map (I3.1) and 1 landing point carrying 2 international cable systems (I3.3). The Southern African Development Community ICT Observatory reports international bandwidth of 217,310 Mbit/s in 2023; an editor's note says the source series is inconsistent and the figure is indicative (I3.4). The research records a confirmed absence of any hyperscaler cloud region (I3.5). A National Data Centre is a flagship project of the Ministry of ICT's 2025 to 2030 Strategic Plan, within a N$639.2m programme (I3.10). No national AI compute facility was identified (I3.6). Data centre capacity and localisation rules were not determined (I3.2, I3.7).

See the 10 indicators for Infrastructure & Data

P4Human Capital1.00 / 4Emerging

Human Capital carries a fellow-assigned score of 1.00, in the Emerging tier. Desk research in October 2026 found that NUST offers bachelor's and honours degrees in Artificial Intelligence and an MSc in Data Science (H4.3). The CSET Country Activity Tracker records 42 AI scholarly publications in 2024, against 26 in 2023 (H4.4). Projects are underway to integrate coding and AI into school curricula, and 65.4% of schools had internet in 2023 (H4.6). The National AI Institute's remit includes youth skills, and no existing workforce reskilling programme was found (H4.7). Translation tools cover Afrikaans and Setswana but not Oshiwambo, Khoekhoegowab, Otjiherero, Rukwangali or Silozi (H4.10). AI researchers per million, patents and labour transition policy were not determined (H4.1, H4.5, H4.8).

See the 10 indicators for Human Capital

P5Innovation & Ecosystem0.70 / 4Nascent

Innovation and Ecosystem carries a fellow-assigned score of 0.70, in the Nascent tier. Desk research in October 2026 found 1 company offering AI services in the TechBehemoths directory, a lower bound and not a census (N5.1). The research records a confirmed absence for standards body AI competency: the national standards body NSI exists, but Namibia is on neither member list of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 and no national AI committee was found (N5.8). The other eight indicators were not determined. NAMFISA launched a sandbox for insurance, pensions and microlending in 2023, which is not AI-specific (N5.4). No AI safety evaluation facility (N5.6), AI risk assessment framework (N5.9) or formal university and industry AI research partnership (N5.10) was identified.

See the 10 indicators for Innovation & Ecosystem

P6Ethics & Inclusion0.90 / 4Nascent

Ethics and Inclusion carries a fellow-assigned score of 0.90, in the Nascent tier. Desk research in October 2026 records a confirmed absence of a citizen redress mechanism: Namibia has no data protection law, no authority and no AI-specific complaint channel (E6.4). The research found that Namibia's AI readiness was assessed in 2025 with the readiness methodology of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (E6.7). The draft strategy process involved 215 local AI experts and stakeholders, and the role of civil society organisations was not specified (E6.8). GIRAI 2026 does not cover Namibia, and impact assessment, bias audit and transparency requirements were not determined (E6.1, E6.2, E6.3). No national AI advisory council was found (E6.6).

See the 10 indicators for Ethics & Inclusion

P7Regional Integration0.90 / 4Nascent

Regional Integration carries a fellow-assigned score of 0.90, in the Nascent tier. Desk research in October 2026 found Namibia on the official signatory list of the Africa Declaration on Artificial Intelligence, done at Kigali on 4 April 2025, with no national implementation step found (R7.1, R7.2). Namibia delivered a national statement at the inaugural United Nations Global Dialogue on AI Governance in Geneva on 6 to 7 July 2026 (R7.9). Namibia Fact Check documented 2 AI-generated deepfakes before the November 2024 elections (R7.7). Namibia was an invited state at the G20 Johannesburg summit on 22 to 23 November 2025 (R7.10). Regional coordination, cross-border agreements, election provisions and a disinformation framework were not determined (R7.3, R7.4, R7.5, R7.6).

See the 10 indicators for Regional Integration

P8Implementation & Impact0.30 / 4Nascent

Implementation and Impact carries a fellow-assigned score of 0.30, in the Nascent tier. Desk research in October 2026 found no positive evidence on any of the 10 indicators. It records a confirmed absence of health AI regulation (M8.2). The other nine indicators were not determined. No monitoring report was found, as there is no adopted AI strategy to monitor (M8.5). No government AI registry was found (M8.4). The Bank of Namibia adopted an AI strategy for its own operations, reported on 17 March 2026, but no sector-wide guidance for financial institutions was found (M8.7). Grants for AI research include projects over NAD 1 m, with no total budget or disbursement figure disclosed (M8.1).

See the 10 indicators for Implementation & Impact

Indicator evidence

Evidence by pillar

Desk-research evidence for each indicator, with sources. Where an indicator is marked “Not determined”, the research could not establish a finding. The Index method excludes such indicators from scoring rather than scoring them as absent.

P1 · Weight 15% of composite

Strategy & Vision

2.20 / 4Developing

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. Southern Africa mean 2.04 · all 54 states mean 1.76.

10 indicators: 6 evidence found, 0 confirmed absence, 4 not determined.

  1. S1.1

    National AI strategy existence

    Evidence found

    Draft: On 27 Sep 2026 the NCRST CEO said the national AI strategy had 'reached the synthesis and national validation stage' before Cabinet consideration. Earlier reports conflict: CIPIT and Carnegie described a strategy launched/published in Feb-Q1 2025, but the Deputy ICT Minister said in Aug 2025 that 'Namibia currently has no dedicated national AI strategy or policy'.

    Editor's note, 7 October 2026: Checked on 7 October 2026. The strategy is at national validation stage and no Cabinet approval was found. The tracker entries that report an adopted strategy are wrong.

    Sources namibian.com.na (opens in a new tab)iafrica.com (opens in a new tab)thebrief.com.na (opens in a new tab)

  2. S1.2

    Strategy adoption date

    Evidence found

    N/A: Not adopted as of Sep 2026 (pending Cabinet). The Feb 2025 'launch' date reported by CIPIT is contradicted by the Aug 2025 ministerial statement and the Sep 2026 validation-stage report.

    Sources namibian.com.na (opens in a new tab)thebrief.com.na (opens in a new tab)cipit.strathmore.edu (opens in a new tab)

  3. S1.3

    Political commitment signals

    Evidence found

    Institutional action: ICT Minister Emma Theofelus launched the National AI Institute in Windhoek (Sep 2026), and the ministry has drafted an AI Bill (Sep 2025). NCRST established a national AI workgroup following 4IR Task Force recommendations.

    Sources namibian.com.na (opens in a new tab)allafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

  4. S1.4

    Dedicated AI budget allocation

    Not determined

    No AI budget or funding figures reported for the strategy or National AI Institute (Sep 2026).

    Sources namibian.com.na (opens in a new tab)allafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

  5. S1.5

    AU Continental AI Strategy alignment

    Evidence found

    Aware: The ministry reports drawing on SADC Model Laws, the AU Continental Strategy on AI and AU Convention frameworks to guide AI governance (Sep 2025).

    Sources allafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

  6. S1.6

    Multi-stakeholder consultation

    Evidence found

    Formal consultation: The draft strategy was developed through consultation with 215 local AI experts and stakeholders, supported by UNESCO, UNDP and Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung (Sep 2026), following a UNESCO RAM (2025).

    Sources namibian.com.na (opens in a new tab)thebrief.com.na (opens in a new tab)

  7. S1.7

    Sector prioritisation

    Evidence found

    Generic: Reported priority sectors are healthcare, education, agriculture and mining (CIPIT, Mar 2025); the strategy text is unpublished and no targets were found.

    Sources cipit.strathmore.edu (opens in a new tab)

  8. S1.8

    Implementation roadmap

    Not determined

    Strategy text unpublished; no roadmap located.

    Sources cipit.strathmore.edu (opens in a new tab)namibian.com.na (opens in a new tab)

  9. S1.9

    Monitoring and evaluation framework

    Not determined

    Strategy text unpublished; no M&E framework located.

    Sources cipit.strathmore.edu (opens in a new tab)namibian.com.na (opens in a new tab)

  10. S1.10

    Strategy review mechanism

    Not determined

    Strategy text unpublished; no review mechanism located.

    Sources cipit.strathmore.edu (opens in a new tab)namibian.com.na (opens in a new tab)

P2 · Weight 15% of composite

Governance & Regulation

1.20 / 4Emerging

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. Southern Africa mean 1.43 · all 54 states mean 1.32.

10 indicators: 3 evidence found, 2 confirmed absence, 5 not determined.

  1. G2.1

    AI-specific legislation

    Evidence found

    Draft: On 4 June 2025 the Speaker of the National Assembly said Namibia was finalising a Draft Artificial Intelligence Bill, alongside a Data Protection Bill and a Cybercrime Bill. In late September 2025 the ICT Minister told Parliament that Namibia was developing an Artificial Intelligence Act aligned with UNESCO ethics recommendations; no enactment was found.

    Sources thebrief.com.na (opens in a new tab)allafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

  2. G2.2

    Data protection law status

    Evidence found

    Draft: Namibia has no data protection law, and draft work began about 12 years earlier (dataprotection.africa, November 2022; Windhoek Express, 18 August 2025). The ICT Minister said the Data Protection Bill would be tabled in Parliament in September 2025; this review could not confirm passage as of October 2026.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)we.com.na (opens in a new tab)thebrief.com.na (opens in a new tab)

  3. G2.3

    DPA AI mandate

    Confirmed absence

    No DPA: dataprotection.africa (November 2022) records that a draft bill has been tabled and no data protection authority appointed; no DPA was found in later 2025 reporting.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)we.com.na (opens in a new tab)

  4. G2.4

    DPA staffing and budget

    Confirmed absence

    Namibia has no data protection authority (dataprotection.africa, November 2022; bill still pending August 2025), so there are no DPA staff or budget figures.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)we.com.na (opens in a new tab)

  5. G2.5

    AI regulatory body existence

    Not determined

    No AI governance body was confirmed; a National AI Strategy and reforms to the Communications Act were referenced in June 2025.

    Sources thebrief.com.na (opens in a new tab)

  6. G2.6

    Institutional design model

    Not determined

    No regulatory model for AI is defined while the AI Bill and Data Protection Bill remain in draft (2025).

    Sources thebrief.com.na (opens in a new tab)allafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

  7. G2.7

    Malabo Convention ratification

    Evidence found

    Ratified: The AU official status list dated 02/02/2026 records for Namibia: no separate signature date, ratification/accession on 25/01/2019 and deposit on 01/02/2019. No evidence of a domestic implementation programme specific to the Convention was assessed, so 'Ratified' rather than 'Implementing' is recorded.

    Sources au.int (opens in a new tab)au.int (2) (opens in a new tab)

  8. G2.8

    Enforcement actions taken

    Not determined

    No AI-related enforcement action (investigation, fine or order concerning AI or automated processing) was located in this desk review (October 2026); absence is not confirmed because DPA decision registers were not accessible.

  9. G2.9

    Extraterritorial provisions

    Not determined

    No data protection or AI law is in force; the territorial scope of the draft bills was not assessed.

    Sources thebrief.com.na (opens in a new tab)we.com.na (opens in a new tab)

  10. G2.10

    IP framework for AI

    Not determined

    No evidence of a review of intellectual property legislation for AI-generated content was located in this desk review (October 2026); IP-specific searches could not be completed, so absence is not confirmed.

P3 · Weight 15% of composite

Infrastructure & Data

1.10 / 4Emerging

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. Southern Africa mean 1.77 · all 54 states mean 1.51.

10 indicators: 6 evidence found, 1 confirmed absence, 3 not determined.

  1. I3.1

    Data center count

    Evidence found

    Data Center Map's Africa directory (page undated; accessed 2026-10-06) lists 2 data centre facility(ies) in Namibia, out of 261 listed across 43 African countries. The directory is self-reported by operators and may include some non-colocation facilities.

    Sources datacentermap.com (opens in a new tab)

  2. I3.2

    Data center capacity (MW)

    Not determined

    No dated, named source publishing total live data centre power capacity (MW) for Namibia was found. Data Center Map's directory does not report MW, and the ResearchAndMarkets Africa portfolio (Mar 2025) does not disclose country breakdowns in its public release.

    Sources datacentermap.com (opens in a new tab)businesswire.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. I3.3

    Submarine cable landing points

    Evidence found

    TeleGeography Submarine Cable Map data (accessed 2026-10-06) lists 1 landing point(s) in Namibia served by at least one in-service international cable (Swakopmund), carrying 2 distinct international cable systems: Equiano, WACS.

    Sources submarinecablemap.com (opens in a new tab)submarinecablemap.com (2) (opens in a new tab)

  4. I3.4

    International bandwidth (Gbps)

    Evidence found

    SADC ICT Observatory (downloaded 2026-10-06) reports Namibia's international internet bandwidth as 217,310 Mbit/s (about 217 Gbps) in 2023. The 2024 (235.0) and 2025 (0.0) entries appear to be unit or entry errors, and 2025 lit/equipped capacity is given as 525K Mbit/s (about 525 Gbps).

    Editor's note, 7 October 2026: The source series is inconsistent between years. The figure is indicative and no score depends on it.

    Sources ictobservatory.sadc.int (opens in a new tab)ictobservatory.sadc.int (2) (opens in a new tab)

  5. I3.5

    Hyperscaler presence

    Confirmed absence

    None: Official region lists checked on 2026-10-06 show no cloud region, availability zone or local/edge zone in Namibia: AWS (Africa region Cape Town only; local zones Johannesburg and Nairobi), Azure (South Africa North/West only), Google Cloud (africa-south1 Johannesburg only), Oracle (Johannesburg and Casablanca live; Kenya coming soon) and Alibaba (no African region). Huawei Cloud's African regions are Johannesburg and Cairo (May 2024), but this rests on press coverage because Huawei's own region page could not be machine-read.

    Sources aws.amazon.com (opens in a new tab)aws.amazon.com (2) (opens in a new tab)learn.microsoft.com (opens in a new tab)

  6. I3.6

    GPU/HPC access

    Evidence found

    Limited (academic only): South Africa's CSIR (undated news item, accessed 2026-10-06) states that its Centre for High Performance Computing has redeployed retired supercomputer infrastructure to regional partner countries including Namibia, under the SADC HPC capacity-building programme hosted at universities. No national AI compute facility or commercial GPU cloud in Namibia was identified.

    Sources csir.co.za (opens in a new tab)

  7. I3.7

    Data localisation provisions

    Not determined

    Namibia has no data protection law and DLA Piper (accessed 2026-10-06) reports no data transfer restrictions. Sectoral localisation rules were not verified in this pass.

    Sources dlapiperdataprotection.com (opens in a new tab)

  8. I3.8

    Cross-border data flow framework

    Evidence found

    Regional framework: DLA Piper (accessed 2026-10-06) states there are no data transfer restrictions in place, and Namibia has no data protection law (a Data Protection Bill was put out for comment in Oct 2022). dataprotection.africa (updated 29 Nov 2022) records Namibia as having ratified the AU Malabo Convention, a regional framework that includes transfer rules.

    Sources dlapiperdataprotection.com (opens in a new tab)dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)

  9. I3.9

    Foreign AI surveillance spending

    Not determined

    Namibia is not among the 11 countries mapped in IDS/ADRN's Smart City Surveillance in Africa (March 2026), and no other dated source documenting a contract value for foreign AI-enabled surveillance in Namibia was opened in this pass.

    Sources ids.ac.uk (opens in a new tab)

  10. I3.10

    Sovereign cloud initiatives

    Evidence found

    Planned: The Brief (5 Aug 2026) reports that Namibia's Ministry of ICT has made a National Data Centre a flagship project of its 2025-2030 Strategic Plan, for secure storage and delivery of public digital services, within a N$639.2m programme.

    Sources thebrief.com.na (opens in a new tab)

P4 · Weight 15% of composite

Human Capital

1.00 / 4Emerging

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. Southern Africa mean 1.40 · all 54 states mean 1.20.

10 indicators: 5 evidence found, 0 confirmed absence, 5 not determined.

  1. H4.1

    AI researchers per million

    Not determined

    No consistent cross-country source of AI-specific researchers per million was found or could be queried for this country as of Oct 2026 (the planned OpenAlex author query was blocked by an API rate limit on 2026-10-06). Context only: UNESCO UIS via World Bank indicator SP.POP.SCIE.RD.P6 reports 224.8 total R&D researchers (all fields, FTE) per million people in 2022; this is not an AI-specific figure.

    Sources api.worldbank.org (opens in a new tab)

  2. H4.2

    DPA staff with AI competency

    Not determined

    No published source was found on the number of data protection authority staff with demonstrable AI technical skills as of Oct 2026; DPA annual reports were not located within the research budget of this pass.

  3. H4.3

    University AI programs

    Evidence found

    Minimum count: an International Science Council chapter on Namibia (Feb 2026) states that NUST offers bachelor's and honours degrees in Artificial Intelligence and an MSc in Data Science; the University of Namibia is also named but without a confirmed AI degree. NBC (2025) reported NUST was introducing a degree in AI Studies.

    Sources council.science (opens in a new tab)nbcnews.na (opens in a new tab)

  4. H4.4

    African-authored AI publications

    Evidence found

    CSET Country Activity Tracker (Merged Academic Corpus) via Our World in Data, series 'AI scholarly publications - Field: All', entity Namibia (NAM), reference year 2024: 42 publications (2023: 26). Counts articles with at least one author at an institution in the country, English title/abstract only; dataset last updated 27 Apr 2026. OpenAlex could not be used because the API was rate-limited on 2026-10-06.

    Data note: CSET/OWID AI publications 2022–24: 9, 26, 42.

    Sources ourworldindata.org (opens in a new tab)ourworldindata.org (2) (opens in a new tab)

  5. H4.5

    AI patents filed

    Not determined

    No country-level count of AI-related domestic patent filings was retrieved as of Oct 2026. WIPO IP Statistics and national IP office data were not accessible in this pass, and no published AI-patent figure for this country was found.

  6. H4.6

    K-12 CS education

    Evidence found

    Pilot: An International Science Council chapter on Namibia (Feb 2026) refers to UNESCO-funded projects underway to integrate coding and AI into school curricula, and notes that only 65.4% of schools (1,311 of 2,004) had internet in 2023.

    Sources council.science (opens in a new tab)

  7. H4.7

    AI workforce training programs

    Evidence found

    Planned: The Minister of ICT launched a National AI Institute in Sep 2026 whose remit includes youth skills development. The Sixth National Development Plan foresees AI training for teachers and learners (ISC, Feb 2026), which found no existing workforce reskilling programme.

    Sources namibian.com.na (opens in a new tab)council.science (opens in a new tab)

  8. H4.8

    Labour transition policy

    Not determined

    No government framework on AI and labour-market transition (adopted, draft or under discussion) was found for this country in the sources opened in this pass (Oct 2026).

  9. H4.9

    Informal economy AI assessment

    Not determined

    No government assessment of AI's impact on the informal economy was found for this country in the sources opened in this pass (Oct 2026).

  10. H4.10

    African language NLP coverage

    Evidence found

    Count of domestic non-European languages in Meta NLLB-200/FLORES-200 or Google Translate (Cloud Translation list accessed Oct 2026; Jun 2024 expansion), mapped by the researcher. Supported: Afrikaans (NLLB afr_Latn; Google af) and Setswana (NLLB tsn_Latn; Google tn). Oshiwambo (Oshindonga/Oshikwanyama), Khoekhoegowab, Otjiherero, Rukwangali and Silozi are not listed.

    Sources raw.githubusercontent.com (opens in a new tab)cloud.google.com (opens in a new tab)blog.google (opens in a new tab)

P5 · Weight 10% of composite

Innovation & Ecosystem

0.70 / 4Nascent

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. Southern Africa mean 1.16 · all 54 states mean 1.05.

10 indicators: 1 evidence found, 1 confirmed absence, 8 not determined.

  1. N5.1

    AI companies count

    Evidence found

    TechBehemoths directory (accessed Oct 2026, page undated) states 'There are 1 Companies in Namibia that provide Artificial Intelligence Services'. Directory of self-listed IT service firms: a lower bound, not a census of AI startups.

    Sources techbehemoths.com (opens in a new tab)

  2. N5.2

    Private AI investment (USD)

    Not determined

    Partech's 2025 report (22 Jan 2026) states that outside the top four markets only Senegal, Morocco and Ghana exceeded US$50M in tech equity, so Namibia received less than US$50M in 2025; no country figure and no AI-specific investment figure was found.

    Sources partechpartners.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. N5.3

    AI incubators/accelerators

    Not determined

    No AI-focused incubator or accelerator count established from an opened source in this pass (general tech hubs not counted).

  4. N5.4

    Regulatory sandbox (AI)

    Not determined

    NAMFISA launched a sandbox for insurance, pensions and microlending in 2023 (non-bank financial, NOT AI-specific). No AI-specific sandbox was identified; the Datasphere Initiative 2025 inventory found AI-specific sandboxes in Africa still nascent.

    Sources openbankproject.com (opens in a new tab)connectingafrica.com (opens in a new tab)thedatasphere.org (opens in a new tab)

  5. N5.5

    Government AI procurement

    Not determined

    No evidence located on government procurement of AI from domestic developers (no AI-specific procurement rule or preference policy found in sources opened).

  6. N5.6

    AI safety evaluation capacity

    Not determined

    No AI safety testing or evaluation facility (academic, government or accredited) identified in sources opened.

  7. N5.7

    ISO/IEC 42001 adoption

    Not determined

    No ISO/IEC 42001 certification of an organisation based in this country and no national adoption of the standard was found (searches Oct 2026); the national standards body is not a member of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42, the committee that publishes ISO/IEC 42001.

    Sources iso.org (opens in a new tab)

  8. N5.8

    Standards body AI competency

    Confirmed absence

    Exists, no AI focus: National standards body NSI (listed as NSIQO, ISO member body) exists, but Namibia is absent from both the participating and observing member lists of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 (Artificial intelligence) as of Oct 2026, so there is no AI committee participation; no national AI committee was found.

    Sources iso.org (opens in a new tab)en.wikipedia.org (opens in a new tab)

  9. N5.9

    AI risk assessment frameworks

    Not determined

    No sector-specific or cross-sector AI risk assessment framework identified in sources opened.

  10. N5.10

    University-industry AI partnerships

    Not determined

    No formal university-industry AI research partnership identified in sources opened.

P6 · Weight 10% of composite

Ethics & Inclusion

0.90 / 4Nascent

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. Southern Africa mean 1.48 · all 54 states mean 1.26.

10 indicators: 2 evidence found, 1 confirmed absence, 7 not determined.

  1. E6.1

    Algorithmic impact assessment

    Not determined

    Namibia is not covered by GIRAI 2026, and no AI impact-assessment requirement or guidance was found in sources opened as of Oct 2026; absence could not be confirmed from an authoritative source. Namibia has no data protection law (dataprotection.africa, Nov 2022).

    Sources global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)

  2. E6.2

    Bias audit requirements

    Not determined

    Namibia is not covered by GIRAI 2026 and no AI bias-audit requirement or guidance was found in sources opened as of Oct 2026; absence could not be confirmed.

    Sources global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)

  3. E6.3

    Transparency obligations

    Not determined

    Namibia is not covered by GIRAI 2026; dataprotection.africa records no automated-decision right ('No law'), and no AI transparency requirement or guidance was found in sources opened as of Oct 2026, so absence of all transparency obligations is not confirmed.

    Sources global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)

  4. E6.4

    Citizen redress mechanism

    Confirmed absence

    No mechanism: dataprotection.africa (Nov 2022) records no data protection law and no authority in Namibia, only a draft bill; DLA Piper's Namibia page (Mar 2026) likewise lists no automated-decision right. No AI-specific complaint channel was found as of Oct 2026.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)dlapiperdataprotection.com (opens in a new tab)

  5. E6.5

    Judicial AI remedy

    Not determined

    No court case on algorithms, AI or solely automated decisions was found for Namibia in sources opened as of Oct 2026 (data protection trackers, GIRAI 2026, which does not cover it); ordinary courts have general jurisdiction, but the absence of precedent is not confirmed by an authoritative source.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)

  6. E6.6

    AI advisory body diversity

    Not determined

    A National AI Institute was launched on 27 Sep 2026 to work with government, universities, industry and young people, but it is a research and innovation institute rather than an advisory body; no national AI advisory council was found.

    Sources namibian.com.na (opens in a new tab)

  7. E6.7

    Global AI governance participation

    Evidence found

    Active member: Namibia's AI readiness was assessed with UNESCO's RAM in 2025, and the Global Center on AI Governance lists Namibia among nine countries in its UNESCO-Recommendation implementation (RAM) project. It is not on the Paris statement (Feb 2025), the initial New Delhi endorser list (Feb 2026) or the GPAI member list.

    Sources globalcenter.ai (opens in a new tab)elysee.fr (opens in a new tab)digitalpolicyalert.org (opens in a new tab)

  8. E6.8

    Civil society AI engagement

    Evidence found

    Ad hoc consultation: The draft National AI Strategy was developed through a process involving 215 local AI experts and stakeholders with UNESCO, UNDP and Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung support (NCRST CEO, 27 Sep 2026). Whether civil society organisations were included as such, and any standing role, was not specified.

    Sources namibian.com.na (opens in a new tab)

  9. E6.9

    African ethical framework reference

    Not determined

    No reference to Ubuntu or African ethical principles was found in AI governance material for Namibia opened as of Oct 2026; no adopted national AI document was searched in full, so absence is not confirmed.

    Sources global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)

  10. E6.10

    Youth participation

    Not determined

    The National AI Institute launched on 27 Sep 2026 is to work with young people and develop youth skills (The Namibian), but no formal youth participation mechanism in AI governance was found.

    Sources namibian.com.na (opens in a new tab)

P7 · Weight 10% of composite

Regional Integration

0.90 / 4Nascent

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. Southern Africa mean 1.62 · all 54 states mean 1.55.

10 indicators: 5 evidence found, 0 confirmed absence, 5 not determined.

  1. R7.1

    AU AI Strategy alignment

    Evidence found

    Awareness: Namibia is a signatory of the Africa Declaration on AI (Kigali, 4 April 2025), which in clause 3.6.1 commits signatories to support national AI policies and governance frameworks aligned with the AU Continental AI Strategy; no country-specific formal alignment process was found in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

    Sources c4ir.rw (opens in a new tab)

  2. R7.2

    Kigali Declaration endorsement

    Evidence found

    Endorsed: Namibia appears on the official signatory list of the Africa Declaration on Artificial Intelligence, done at Kigali on 4 April 2025 (C4IR Rwanda PDF created 5 April 2025; list of AU, Smart Africa and 52 states). No evidence of a national implementation step specifically citing the Declaration was found as of Oct 2026.

    Sources c4ir.rw (opens in a new tab)aiexpoafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. R7.3

    REC AI governance coordination

    Not determined

    Namibia is a member of SADC (1990). SADC ministers (Bulawayo, 22-26 June 2026) discussed responsible AI adoption in infrastructure and the SADC Secretariat is developing a Regional AI Strategy and Regulatory Framework, but no Namibia-specific participation in REC AI coordination was documented in sources opened.

    Sources en.wikipedia.org (opens in a new tab)sadc.int (opens in a new tab)itweb.africa (opens in a new tab)

  4. R7.4

    Cross-border AI agreements

    Not determined

    No bilateral or multilateral AI governance cooperation agreement involving Namibia was found in sources opened as of Oct 2026; non-binding declarations (Kigali 2025 and, where applicable, Paris 2025 or New Delhi 2026) are recorded under R7.2 and R7.10.

  5. R7.5

    Election integrity AI provisions

    Not determined

    No legal or institutional provision addressing AI in elections was found for Namibia in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

  6. R7.6

    Disinformation response framework

    Not determined

    No government framework for responding to AI-generated disinformation was found for Namibia in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

  7. R7.7

    AI election incidents documented

    Evidence found

    Namibia Fact Check (3 May 2024) documented 2 AI-generated deepfakes before the Nov 2024 elections: a mid-March 2024 Trump clip about blowing up Namibian uranium and a mid-April 2024 Biden clip endorsing Swapo and candidate Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah, both circulated on WhatsApp.

    Sources namibiafactcheck.org.na (opens in a new tab)

  8. R7.8

    Platform content moderation

    Not determined

    No government engagement with platforms on AI content moderation was found for Namibia in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

  9. R7.9

    Geneva Dialogue participation

    Evidence found

    Active contributor: Namibia delivered a national statement at the inaugural UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance (Geneva, 6-7 July 2026), per the UN list of statements from Member States and Observers.

    Sources un.org (opens in a new tab)un.org (2) (opens in a new tab)

  10. R7.10

    G20/multilateral AI engagement

    Evidence found

    Observer: Namibia was an invited state at the G20 Johannesburg summit (22-23 Nov 2025), represented by President Nandi-Ndaitwah. It is not on the Paris AI Action Summit statement (Feb 2025) or the initial New Delhi AI Impact Declaration endorser list (Feb 2026).

    Sources en.wikipedia.org (opens in a new tab)elysee.fr (opens in a new tab)digitalpolicyalert.org (opens in a new tab)

P8 · Weight 10% of composite

Implementation & Impact

0.30 / 4Nascent

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. Southern Africa mean 0.70 · all 54 states mean 0.78.

10 indicators: 0 evidence found, 1 confirmed absence, 9 not determined.

  1. M8.1

    AI governance budget disbursed

    Not determined

    The ISC profile (Feb 2026) reports grants allocated for AI research, including projects over NAD 1 m, but discloses no total AI budget or disbursement figure.

    Sources council.science (opens in a new tab)

  2. M8.2

    Health AI regulation

    Confirmed absence

    None: The ISC country profile (Feb 2026) identifies no specific health AI regulation, although healthcare is a priority sector in the readiness assessment. The national AI strategy was still under development and the AI Bill was in draft (Sep 2025).

    Sources council.science (opens in a new tab)allafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. M8.3

    Health AI devices approved

    Not determined

    No data was found on approved AI health devices.

    Sources council.science (opens in a new tab)

  4. M8.4

    Government AI system registry

    Not determined

    No government AI registry was found; a national AI workgroup sits under NCRST (Sep 2025).

    Sources allafrica.com (opens in a new tab)council.science (opens in a new tab)

  5. M8.5

    AI governance M&E reports

    Not determined

    No implementation M&E report was found, as there is no adopted AI strategy to monitor. A UNESCO AI Readiness Assessment (2025) was produced, finding 'no dedicated national AI strategy or policy' (Deputy Minister, Aug 2025); it is a diagnostic, not M&E.

    Sources thebrief.com.na (opens in a new tab)council.science (opens in a new tab)

  6. M8.6

    Agriculture AI governance

    Not determined

    Agriculture is a priority sector, with funding for food-security technology projects (ISC, Feb 2026), but no agriculture AI governance provisions were found.

    Sources council.science (opens in a new tab)

  7. M8.7

    Financial services AI governance

    Not determined

    The Bank of Namibia adopted an organisation-wide AI strategy for its own operations (reported 17 Mar 2026) and funded NUST's AI and Robotics Accelerator (2025). No sector-wide AI guidance for financial institutions was found.

    Sources centralbanking.com (opens in a new tab)council.science (opens in a new tab)

  8. M8.8

    Education AI governance

    Not determined

    UNESCO-funded projects introduce coding and AI in school curricula, and NUST launched an AI bachelor's degree (2025). The 2025 readiness assessment recommends embedding ethics in education, but no education AI guidance was found.

    Sources council.science (opens in a new tab)thebrief.com.na (opens in a new tab)

  9. M8.9

    Measurable governance outcomes

    Not determined

    No documented protective outcome was found; the Data Protection Bill was still pending (ISC, Feb 2026).

    Sources council.science (opens in a new tab)

  10. M8.10

    WHO AI health guidance adoption

    Not determined

    No adoption of WHO AI-for-health guidance was found. The ICT Ministry stated in Sep 2025 that AI principles are being aligned with the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI, not WHO guidance.

    Sources allafrica.com (opens in a new tab)afro.who.int (opens in a new tab)

Method

What is the Africa AI Governance Index?

The Africa AI Governance Index 2026 assesses 8 pillars of national AI governance. Each pillar is examined through 10 indicators. The Index is diagnostic. It measures formal governance instruments, not capability. Composite differences under about 0.1 are not meaningful.

Indicator score key

Indicator score key, 0 to 4
ScoreDefinition
0 No evidenceNo policy, institution, or activity. Confirmed absence.
1 NascentInitial discussion, concept note, informal working group.
2 DevelopingDraft policy, institution forming, pilot, or formal consultation.
3 EstablishedAdopted policy or operational institution; limited enforcement.
4 AdvancedFully operational with enforcement and measurable outcomes.

Maturity tiers

Applied to pillar and composite means.

Maturity tiers by score range
TierMean score
NascentBelow 1.00
Emerging1.00 to 1.99
Developing2.00 to 2.99
Established3.00 and above

How scores are built

A pillar score is the mean of the scored indicators in that pillar. Confirmed absence scores 0. An indicator where nothing could be determined is excluded from the pillar mean and reported as not scored. A score with no supporting evidence is excluded.

The composite is 15% of each of pillars P1 to P4 plus 10% of each of pillars P5 to P8, on a scale of 0 to 4. In other words, P1, P2, P3, P4 carry 15% each and P5, P6, P7, P8 carry 10% each.

Source: Africa AI Governance Index 2026 Final Dataset, 54 countries, built 6 October 2026. Lawyers Hub, Africa AI Policy Lab. Version 1.2, 7 October 2026.

Suggested citation

Lawyers Hub, Africa AI Policy Lab (2026). Country Profile on AI Governance: Namibia. Africa AI Governance Index 2026, version 1.2, 7 October 2026. https://www.aipolicy.africa/country-profiles/namibia