Africa AI Governance Index 2026 · Country profile on AI governance

Country Profile on AI Governance: Cameroon

Cameroon scores 1.31 out of 4 on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026. It sits in the Emerging tier and ranks 22 of 54 states.

Region
Central Africa
Version
1.2 · 7 October 2026
Evidence reference date
30 June 2026
Overview

Cameroon at a glance

How to read this profile

The Index is diagnostic. It measures formal governance instruments, not capability. Composite differences under about 0.1 are not meaningful.

Country

Population (2024)
29.1 million
Region
Central Africa
Regional economic communities
Economic Community of Central African States
Geography
Coastal, 5 international submarine cable systems in service

Governance status

  • National AI strategy S1.1

    3 / 4

  • Data protection law G2.2

    3 / 4

  • AI regulatory body G2.5

    1 / 4

  • Malabo Convention ratification G2.7

    1 / 4

  • Kigali Declaration endorsement R7.2

    3 / 4

Scores are indicator scores on the 0–4 key in the method section, not maturity tiers.

Headline assessment

Cameroon scores 1.31 out of 4 on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026. It sits in the Emerging tier and ranks 22 of 54 states. The score rests on 79 of 80 indicators scored from the fellow country profile. The strongest pillar is Strategy & Vision (2.00). The weakest are Innovation & Ecosystem and Implementation & Impact (0.80 each). The Central Africa mean is 1.07. The mean for all 54 states is 1.33.

Strongest pillar
Strategy & Vision2.00 / 4Developing
Weakest pillars
Innovation & Ecosystem0.80 / 4NascentImplementation & Impact0.80 / 4Nascent

Indicators scored: 79 / 80

Pillar scores

Pillar scores at a glance

Each pillar is scored from 0 to 4 as the mean of its scored indicators.

Bar chart of Cameroon's eight pillar scores out of 4, compared with the Central Africa mean and the mean of all 54 states. The same figures are listed beside each bar and in the table below.
  • Cameroon score
  • Central Africa mean
  • All 54 states mean
  1. P1Strategy & Vision
    2.00Developing

    Central Africa: 1.40
    All 54 states: 1.76

  2. P2Governance & Regulation
    1.10Emerging

    Central Africa: 1.31
    All 54 states: 1.32

  3. P3Infrastructure & Data
    1.56Emerging

    Central Africa: 1.20
    All 54 states: 1.51

  4. P4Human Capital
    1.30Emerging

    Central Africa: 0.69
    All 54 states: 1.20

  5. P5Innovation & Ecosystem
    0.80Nascent

    Central Africa: 0.67
    All 54 states: 1.05

  6. P6Ethics & Inclusion
    1.30Emerging

    Central Africa: 1.16
    All 54 states: 1.26

  7. P7Regional Integration
    1.30Emerging

    Central Africa: 1.34
    All 54 states: 1.55

  8. P8Implementation & Impact
    0.80Nascent

    Central Africa: 0.60
    All 54 states: 0.78

  9. Composite (weighted)
    1.31Emerging

    Central Africa: 1.07
    All 54 states: 1.33

View the pillar scores as a table
Cameroon pillar scores on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026
PillarBasisWeightScore (0–4)MaturityCentral Africa meanAfrica mean
P1 Strategy & VisionMean of 10/10 indicators15%2.00Developing1.401.76
P2 Governance & RegulationMean of 10/10 indicators15%1.10Emerging1.311.32
P3 Infrastructure & DataMean of 9/10 indicators15%1.56Emerging1.201.51
P4 Human CapitalMean of 10/10 indicators15%1.30Emerging0.691.20
P5 Innovation & EcosystemMean of 10/10 indicators10%0.80Nascent0.671.05
P6 Ethics & InclusionMean of 10/10 indicators10%1.30Emerging1.161.26
P7 Regional IntegrationMean of 10/10 indicators10%1.30Emerging1.341.55
P8 Implementation & ImpactMean of 10/10 indicators10%0.80Nascent0.600.78
Composite (weighted)—100%1.31Emerging1.071.33
Country report

What the scores say about Cameroon

Cameroon scores 1.31 out of 4 on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026, in the Emerging tier, and ranks 22 of 54. The Index scores 79 of 80 indicators. The strongest pillar is Strategy and Vision at 2.00. The weakest are Innovation and Ecosystem and Implementation and Impact, both at 0.80. The composite sits above the Central Africa mean of 1.07 and level with the Africa mean of 1.33. The evidence explains the profile: Cameroon adopted its SNIA on 7 July 2025 and enacted a data protection law on 23 December 2024, but the institutions that both instruments call for are not yet operational.

P1Strategy & Vision2.00 / 4Developing

Cameroon scores 2.00 on Strategy and Vision, in the Developing tier. Cameroon formally adopted the SNIA on 7 July 2025, and the Minister of Posts and Telecommunications, Minette Libom Li Likeng, unveiled it at CONIA 2025 (S1.1, score 3). CONIA 2025 brought together more than 400 participants (S1.6, score 3). The SNIA names health, agriculture, education, justice and public services as priority sectors (S1.7, score 3). Its 2040 vision sets phased targets: 4,000 trained per year, 5 centres of excellence and 12 sovereign AI solutions (S1.8, score 2). The profile confirms no ring-fenced national AI budget line (S1.4, score 1), no standalone monitoring and evaluation framework (S1.9, score 1) and no gazetted review schedule (S1.10, score 1).

See the 10 indicators for Strategy & Vision

P2Governance & Regulation1.10 / 4Emerging

Cameroon scores 1.10 on Governance and Regulation, in the Emerging tier. Law No. 2024/017 of 23 December 2024 on data protection is enacted, with an 18-month transition ending June 2026 (G2.2, score 3). It establishes the ADCP, whose mandate covers automated decisions (G2.3, score 2), but the ADCP has no publicly confirmed staff and no published budget (G2.4, score 0). No AI-specific law is enacted (G2.1, score 1), and the AI authority and Presidential AI Council that the SNIA proposes were not gazetted as of June 2026 (G2.5, score 1). Cameroon signed but has not ratified the African Union Malabo Convention (G2.7, score 1). The profile finds no intellectual property review for AI-generated content (G2.10, score 0).

See the 10 indicators for Governance & Regulation

P3Infrastructure & Data1.56 / 4Emerging

Cameroon scores 1.56 on Infrastructure and Data, in the Emerging tier, with 9 of 10 indicators scored. The scoring basis counts 5 submarine cable systems, and the profile confirms SAT-3/WASC and WACS landing in Douala (I3.3, score 3). The ST Digital Tier 3 data centre in Douala is confirmed (I3.1, score 2), and the profile identifies ST Digital as strategic sovereign cloud partner (I3.10, score 2). Law 2024/017 sets cross-border transfer conditions, with no bilateral adequacy agreements (I3.8, score 2). The profile finds no published megawatt figures (I3.2, score 0), no national HPC or GPU facility (I3.6, score 1) and no confirmed local hyperscaler infrastructure (I3.5, score 1). Foreign AI surveillance spending is not scored (I3.9).

See the 10 indicators for Infrastructure & Data

P4Human Capital1.30 / 4Emerging

Cameroon scores 1.30 on Human Capital, in the Emerging tier. African language coverage scores 3 (H4.10), but that score is retained and under second-edition review: it rests on one language, Fulfulde, which the evidence describes as having some NLP research. The Universities of Yaoundé I, Douala and Buea have computer science departments, and Sazience Academy launched in 2025 (H4.3, score 2). The SNIA targets 60,000 people trained, 40% of them women, by 2040 (H4.7, score 2). The profile finds no documented AI patent filings (H4.5, score 0), no AI competency data for ADCP staff (H4.2, score 0), no confirmed mandatory school computing curriculum (H4.6, score 1) and no formal government labour transition policy (H4.8, score 1).

See the 10 indicators for Human Capital

P5Innovation & Ecosystem0.80 / 4Nascent

Cameroon scores 0.80 on Innovation and Ecosystem, in the Nascent tier. The profile records 30 to 50 or more technology and AI-adjacent startups in Douala and Yaoundé, and more than $22.1M raised in Douala by mid-2025 across 16 deals (N5.1, score 2; N5.2, score 2). Sazience Academy rests on a formal memorandum of understanding between WorldQuant University and Sazience Tech (N5.10, score 2). Five indicators score 0: the profile confirms no dedicated AI accelerator (N5.3), no AI regulatory sandbox (N5.4), no AI safety testing facility (N5.6), no ISO/IEC 42001 adoption (N5.7) and no AI risk framework (N5.9). ANOR, the standards agency, has no confirmed AI technical committee (N5.8, score 1).

See the 10 indicators for Innovation & Ecosystem

P6Ethics & Inclusion1.30 / 4Emerging

Cameroon scores 1.30 on Ethics and Inclusion, in the Emerging tier. Four indicators score 2. The SNIA is registered on the OECD.AI policy tracker (E6.7). CONIA 2025 formally included civil society and non-governmental organisations (E6.8) and youth innovators (E6.10). The SNIA states that it is 'rooted in African cultural realities' (E6.9). Law 2024/017 mandates data protection impact assessments for high-risk processing, with no standalone algorithmic impact assessment (E6.1, score 1). It provides a complaint route to the ADCP, which is not yet fully operational (E6.4, score 1). No formal standing AI advisory body exists (E6.6, score 1). The profile finds no bias audit requirements (E6.2, score 0).

See the 10 indicators for Ethics & Inclusion

P7Regional Integration1.30 / 4Emerging

Cameroon scores 1.30 on Regional Integration, in the Emerging tier. The scoring basis lists Cameroon as a signatory of the Africa Declaration on AI, Kigali, 4 April 2025 (R7.2, score 3). The SNIA references African Union Agenda 2063 (R7.1, score 2). It also proposes a Central African Regional AI Network (R7.3, score 2). The profile finds no legal or institutional provisions on AI in elections (R7.5, score 0); the file notes a presidential election on 12 October 2025. It finds no formal government disinformation framework (R7.6, score 1), no confirmed cross-border AI agreements (R7.4, score 1) and no confirmed delegation to the United Nations Global AI Dialogue in July 2026 (R7.9, score 1).

See the 10 indicators for Regional Integration

P8Implementation & Impact0.80 / 4Nascent

Cameroon scores 0.80 on Implementation and Impact, in the Nascent tier. Agriculture is the one indicator above 1: the PATNUC agritech innovation challenge, in its 2nd edition in 2026, provides government funding and oversight, and the Ndemri soil and plant health tool is active in the Far North (M8.6, score 2). The World Bank funds PATNUC, but the profile finds no ring-fenced AI governance budget figure (M8.1, score 1). Three indicators score 0: no health AI device approval mechanism (M8.3), no registry of government AI systems (M8.4) and no published monitoring report on AI governance (M8.5). No AI-specific regulation exists for health (M8.2), financial services (M8.7) or education (M8.8), each scored 1.

See the 10 indicators for Implementation & Impact

Indicator evidence

Evidence by pillar

Evidence and score for each of the 80 indicators, with sources. Scores use the 0–4 indicator score key in the method section, which is a different scale from the maturity tiers. “Not scored” means nothing could be determined, or a score had no supporting evidence: the indicator is left out of the pillar mean rather than counted as 0. “N/A” and “Context only” sit outside the score.

P1 · Weight 15% of composite

Strategy & Vision

2.00 / 4Developing

Mean of all 10 indicator scores. Central Africa mean 1.40 · all 54 states mean 1.76.

  1. S1.1

    National AI strategy existence

    Score 3 / 4

    SNIA was formally adopted on July 7 2025, and unveiled at CONIA 2025 by Minister of Posts and Telecommunications Minette Libom Li Likeng

    Note: Adopted but implementing institutions (AI Authority, Presidential Council) still being established

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  2. S1.2

    Strategy adoption date

    Score 1 / 4

    July 2025

    Note: at CONIA 2025 closing

    Scoring basis Threshold applied. Adopted 2025-07: 11 months before 2026-06-30.

    Sources techafricanews.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. S1.3

    Political commitment signals

    Score 3 / 4

    Ministerial launch by Minister of Posts & Telecom; CONIA 2025 convened 400+ stakeholders; IMF AI Preparedness score 0.34/1 cited as motivation

    Note: Presidential-level decree not yet confirmed; ministerial statements are formal institutional actions

    Sources cameroononline.org (opens in a new tab)

  4. S1.4

    Dedicated AI budget allocation

    Score 1 / 4

    World Bank-funded PATNUC supports agritech innovation (up to CFA40M per startup); no confirmed ring-fenced national AI budget line

    Note: AI investment largely embedded within ICT/telecom ministry budget

    Sources businessincameroon.com (opens in a new tab)

  5. S1.5

    AU Continental AI Strategy alignment

    Score 2 / 4

    SNIA explicitly references AU Agenda 2063 and plans GPAI/AU AI Technical Committee engagement

    Note: Formal alignment process documented; full alignment not yet verified through AU reporting

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  6. S1.6

    Multi-stakeholder consultation

    Score 3 / 4

    CONIA 2025 (2nd edition) brought together 400+ participants: public administration, universities, incubators, private sector, international orgs

    Note: Civil society participation documented; ongoing permanent mechanism not yet institutionalised

    Sources theguardianpostcameroon.com (opens in a new tab)

  7. S1.7

    Sector prioritisation

    Score 3 / 4

    SNIA identifies health, agriculture, education, justice, and public services as priority sectors

    Note: Sector roadmaps not yet individually published; targets at strategy level only

    Sources businessincameroon.com (opens in a new tab)

  8. S1.8

    Implementation roadmap

    Score 2 / 4

    2040 vision with phased targets: 4,000 trained/year, 5 centres of excellence, 12 sovereign AI solutions

    Note: Phased plan exists in SNIA; detailed annual milestones with accountability not yet published

    Sources nkafu.org (opens in a new tab)

  9. S1.9

    Monitoring and evaluation framework

    Score 1 / 4

    No standalone M&E published; SNIA mentions Presidential AI Council as oversight body but not yet operational

    Note: Planned under governance pillar; no active reporting cycle confirmed

    Sources techafricanews.com (opens in a new tab)

  10. S1.10

    Strategy review mechanism

    Score 1 / 4

    Governance pillar references Presidential Council on AI for strategy oversight; no gazetted review schedule

    Note: Review mechanism implied by institutional design; no formal schedule

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

P2 · Weight 15% of composite

Governance & Regulation

1.10 / 4Emerging

Mean of all 10 indicator scores. Central Africa mean 1.31 · all 54 states mean 1.32.

  1. G2.1

    AI-specific legislation

    Score 1 / 4

    No AI-specific law enacted; SNIA calls for a framework AI law; cybersecurity law (Law No. 2010/012) exists

    Note: AI legislation flagged as next step under SNIA governance pillar; under discussion stage

    Sources researchgate.net (opens in a new tab)

  2. G2.2

    Data protection law status

    Score 3 / 4

    Law No. 2024/017 of 23 December 2024 enacted; 18-month compliance transition ending June 2026; 38th African country

    Note: Law enacted; ADCP supervisory authority mandated but not yet confirmed as fully staffed

    Sources pollicy.medium.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. G2.3

    DPA AI mandate

    Score 2 / 4

    Law 2024/017 establishes ADCP with mandate to regulate data processing including automated decisions

    Note: DPA structurally exists; AI-specific mandate not explicit; ANTIC retains ICT/cybersecurity oversight

    Sources africanlawbusiness.com (opens in a new tab)

  4. G2.4

    DPA staffing and budget

    Score 0 / 4

    ADCP not yet publicly confirmed as operationally staffed; no published budget data

    Note: 18-month transition still active; critical capacity gap

    Scoring basis Fellow score kept; no raw value for the threshold.

  5. G2.5

    AI regulatory body existence

    Score 1 / 4

    SNIA proposes a 'Cameroonian AI Authority' (AIRA) and a Presidential AI Council; neither gazetted as of June 2026

    Note: Proposed; not yet enacted

    Sources iafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

  6. G2.6

    Institutional design model

    Score 1 / 4

    Proposed: new dedicated AI body (AIRA) with risk-tiered approach aligned to EU AI Act; not yet enacted

    Note: Design in policy literature; no official gazette

    Sources researchgate.net (opens in a new tab)

  7. G2.7

    Malabo Convention ratification

    Score 1 / 4

    Cameroon signed but has not ratified the AU Malabo Convention

    Note: Signed = nascent; ratification absent despite domestic data law enactment

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)

  8. G2.8

    Enforcement actions taken

    Score 1 / 4

    ART sanctioned telecom operators in 2019 for subscriber ID failures; no AI-specific enforcement documented

    Note: Pre-data law enforcement only; no post-2024 AI enforcement confirmed

    Sources lexafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

  9. G2.9

    Extraterritorial provisions

    Score 1 / 4

    Law 2024/017 explicitly excludes data controllers outside Cameroon processing Cameroonian data

    Note: Significant gap vs GDPR model

    Sources techhiveadvisory.africa (opens in a new tab)

  10. G2.10

    IP framework for AI

    Score 0 / 4

    No IP legislation review for AI-generated content identified

    Note: Likely embedded in broader digital economy agenda

P3 · Weight 15% of composite

Infrastructure & Data

1.56 / 4Emerging

Mean of the 9 scored indicators; 1 carries no score. Central Africa mean 1.20 · all 54 states mean 1.51.

No score: 1 context only.

  1. I3.1

    Data center count

    Score 2 / 4

    ST Digital Tier 3 data centre in Douala confirmed (ministerial visit July 2025); at least 1–3 commercial facilities

    Note: Exact national count not published; ST Digital identified as strategic government partner

    Scoring basis Threshold applied. Raw value: 2 (data centres).

    Sources businessincameroon.com (opens in a new tab)

  2. I3.2

    Data center capacity (MW)

    Score 0 / 4

    No published MW figures for Cameroonian data centers found

    Note: ST Digital Tier 3 capacity not publicly disclosed

    Scoring basis Fellow score kept; no raw value for the threshold.

  3. I3.3

    Submarine cable landing points

    Score 3 / 4

    SAT-3/WASC and WACS cables confirmed landing in Douala; at least 2 international submarine cable connections

    Note: 2–3 submarine cable landing points confirmed

    Scoring basis Threshold applied. 5 cable systems (TeleGeography, accessed 2026-10-06).

    Sources en.wikipedia.org (opens in a new tab)

  4. I3.4

    International bandwidth (Gbps)

    Score 1 / 4

    42% internet penetration 2024–25 (Nkafu Institute); 88% population covered by 2G+ (ITU 2025)

    Note: Bandwidth not publicly aggregated; improving but significant rural gaps

    Scoring basis Fellow score kept; no raw value for the threshold.

    Sources businessbeat24.com (opens in a new tab)

  5. I3.5

    Hyperscaler presence

    Score 1 / 4

    No confirmed AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud local infrastructure in Cameroon; ST Digital offers sovereign cloud

    Note: No global hyperscaler confirmed locally present

    Sources businessincameroon.com (opens in a new tab)

  6. I3.6

    GPU/HPC access

    Score 1 / 4

    No national HPC/GPU facility; SNIA proposes solar-powered edge computing; Sazience Academy uses cloud-based ML tools

    Note: Academic-only access; no commercial GPU facility confirmed

    Sources edtechinnovationhub.com (opens in a new tab)

  7. I3.7

    Data localisation provisions

    Score 2 / 4

    Law 2024/017 includes cross-border transfer conditions; no comprehensive localisation mandate

    Note: Partial framework; sectoral only at this stage

    Sources techhiveadvisory.africa (opens in a new tab)

  8. I3.8

    Cross-border data flow framework

    Score 2 / 4

    Law 2024/017 includes transfer conditions (consent, adequacy, contractual safeguards); no bilateral adequacy agreements

    Note: General legal framework; ECCAS-level regional framework not yet operational

    Sources pollicy.medium.com (opens in a new tab)

  9. I3.9

    Foreign AI surveillance spending

    Context only: Context flag outside the score

    No publicly documented government spending on foreign AI surveillance systems; CIPESA 2025 flags risk

    Note: Data not publicly available; risk flagged by civil society

    Scoring basis Context flag; outside the score. Raw value read from the evidence: "Data not publicly available; risk flagged by civil society" [evidence also says no documented spending].

    Sources cipesa.org (opens in a new tab)

  10. I3.10

    Sovereign cloud initiatives

    Score 2 / 4

    ST Digital identified as strategic sovereign cloud partner; SNIA calls for government Data Lake and national data sovereignty

    Note: Under development; sovereign cloud partner identified but national infrastructure not fully operational

    Sources businessincameroon.com (opens in a new tab)

P4 · Weight 15% of composite

Human Capital

1.30 / 4Emerging

Mean of all 10 indicator scores. Central Africa mean 0.69 · all 54 states mean 1.20.

  1. H4.1

    AI researchers per million

    Score 1 / 4

    IMF AI Preparedness Index scores Cameroon 0.34/1, noting 'promising human capital'; no official per-million count

    Note: Small researcher base at Universities of Yaoundé I, Douala, and Buea; no national registry

    Scoring basis Fellow score kept; no raw value for the threshold.

    Sources cameroononline.org (opens in a new tab)

  2. H4.2

    DPA staff with AI competency

    Score 0 / 4

    ADCP not yet confirmed as operationally staffed; no AI-specific staff competency data

    Note: Critical gap for enforcement capacity

    Scoring basis Fellow score kept; no raw value for the threshold.

  3. H4.3

    University AI programs

    Score 2 / 4

    Universities of Yaoundé I, Douala, and Buea have CS/IT depts; Sazience Academy (WorldQuant) launched 2025; Yaounde Innovation City hosts AI/robotics firms

    Note: Formal AI-specific MSc-level programmes rare; AI embedded within CS curricula

    Scoring basis Fellow score kept; no raw value for the threshold.

    Sources edtechinnovationhub.com (opens in a new tab)

  4. H4.4

    African-authored AI publications

    Score 2 / 4

    Active academic AI research documented (e.g., ML for TB diagnosis at Yaoundé Jamot Hospital); kmer-ai.org platform active

    Note: Annual count not officially published; small but growing output

    Scoring basis Threshold applied. 90.7 papers/yr ÷ 29.12m people = 3.11 per million (floors applied).

    Sources medrxiv.org (opens in a new tab)

  5. H4.5

    AI patents filed

    Score 0 / 4

    No documented AI patent filings from Cameroon found

    Note: OAPI (African IP Org) has Yaoundé office but no AI patent statistics found

    Scoring basis Threshold applied. Raw value: 0 (AI patent applications/year). Raw value read from the evidence: "No documented AI patent filings from Cameroon found". Checked against the evidence on 7 October 2026: confirmed.

  6. H4.6

    K-12 CS education

    Score 1 / 4

    No confirmed mandatory K-12 CS/AI curriculum; SNIA calls for integration of digital literacy from primary level

    Note: Pilot stage at best; reform called for in SNIA

    Sources nkafu.org (opens in a new tab)

  7. H4.7

    AI workforce training programs

    Score 2 / 4

    SNIA targets 60,000 trained (40% women) by 2040; PATNUC agritech challenge; government-supported competitions active

    Note: Programmes active but not yet at scale; mostly competition/incubation model

    Sources businessincameroon.com (opens in a new tab)

  8. H4.8

    Labour transition policy

    Score 1 / 4

    SNIA references labour market impact; Nkafu Policy Institute published assessment (Jan 2026); no formal government policy

    Note: Under discussion; academic/think-tank level only

    Sources nkafu.org (opens in a new tab)

  9. H4.9

    Informal economy AI assessment

    Score 1 / 4

    Nkafu Policy Institute (Jan 2026) assessed AI-workforce implications including informal sector

    Note: Think-tank assessment; not government-published with recommendations

    Sources nkafu.org (opens in a new tab)

  10. H4.10

    African language NLP coverage

    Score 3 / 4

    SNIA includes multilingual AI pillar targeting sovereign LLM 'GPT Cameroon'; Cameroon has ~280 languages; Fulfulde, Bamiléké, Ewondo have some NLP research

    Note: GPT Cameroon in planning; existing NLP tools for 2–4 languages; significant gap to close

    Scoring basis Threshold applied. Raw value: 1 of 2 (languages supported / major languages), normalised 50. 50% of major domestic languages. Raw value read from the evidence: "Fulfulde, Bamiléké, Ewondo have some NLP research" [only Fulfulde is on the major-language list; notes say NLP tools for 2–4 (unnamed) languages; denominator (. Listed for second-edition review: The score of 3 rests on one language, Fulfulde, which the evidence describes as having some NLP research. Coverage in the reference lists is not shown.

    Sources iafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

P5 · Weight 10% of composite

Innovation & Ecosystem

0.80 / 4Nascent

Mean of all 10 indicator scores. Central Africa mean 0.67 · all 54 states mean 1.05.

  1. N5.1

    AI companies count

    Score 2 / 4

    30–50+ tech/AI-adjacent startups in Douala and Yaoundé; >$22.1M raised in Douala by mid-2025 across 16 deals; kmer-ai.org lists Cameroon AI innovators

    Note: No official AI company registry; estimate 20–50 firms with AI components

    Scoring basis Threshold applied. Raw value: 35 (companies).

    Sources femaleswitch.com (opens in a new tab)

  2. N5.2

    Private AI investment (USD)

    Score 2 / 4

    >$22.1M raised in Douala tech ecosystem by mid-2025; government tax exemptions (5 years) for agritech/fintech/cleantech startups

    Note: AI-specific investment share not disaggregated from total tech investment

    Scoring basis Fellow score kept; no raw value for the threshold.

    Sources femaleswitch.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. N5.3

    AI incubators/accelerators

    Score 0 / 4

    ActivSpaces (Buea/Silicon Mountain), Cameroon Tech Hub (Yaoundé), Activate (Douala), Seedstars Douala, Yaounde Innovation City (AI/robotics)

    Note: 4–6 incubators with AI-adjacent focus; dedicated pure-AI accelerators not confirmed

    Scoring basis Threshold applied. Raw value: 0 (incubators/accelerators). Raw value read from the evidence: "dedicated pure-AI accelerators not confirmed" [4–6 AI-adjacent general hubs excluded]. Checked against the evidence on 7 October 2026: confirmed.

    Sources cameroon-marketplace.com (opens in a new tab)

  4. N5.4

    Regulatory sandbox (AI)

    Score 0 / 4

    No AI-specific regulatory sandbox identified

    Note: SNIA mentions accelerators; formal sandbox not established

  5. N5.5

    Government AI procurement

    Score 1 / 4

    Government identified ST Digital as strategic partner; PATNUC awards up to CFA40M per digital solution

    Note: Ad hoc procurement; no formal domestic AI procurement preference policy

    Sources businessincameroon.com (opens in a new tab)

  6. N5.6

    AI safety evaluation capacity

    Score 0 / 4

    No AI safety testing facility or accredited evaluation lab found; ANTIC has ICT security oversight but no AI safety mandate

    Note: Critical gap; SNIA governance pillar may eventually address

  7. N5.7

    ISO/IEC 42001 adoption

    Score 0 / 4

    No evidence of ISO/IEC 42001 adoption in Cameroon; ANOR has no confirmed AI technical committee

    Note: ANOR exists; AI-specific committee not confirmed

  8. N5.8

    Standards body AI competency

    Score 1 / 4

    ANOR (Agence des Normes et de la Qualité) exists; no confirmed AI-specific technical committee

    Note: Nascent awareness only

  9. N5.9

    AI risk assessment frameworks

    Score 0 / 4

    No sector-specific or cross-sector AI risk framework; Law 2024/017 requires DPIAs which partially address automated decision risks

    Note: DPIA requirement is a partial proxy; dedicated AI risk framework absent

    Sources pollicy.medium.com (opens in a new tab)

  10. N5.10

    University-industry AI partnerships

    Score 2 / 4

    Sazience Academy (WorldQuant Univ + Sazience Tech) formal MoU; MIT African Graduate Association hackathon; Yaounde Innovation City

    Note: Formal MoUs emerging; joint labs not confirmed at major public universities

    Sources edtechinnovationhub.com (opens in a new tab)

P6 · Weight 10% of composite

Ethics & Inclusion

1.30 / 4Emerging

Mean of all 10 indicator scores. Central Africa mean 1.16 · all 54 states mean 1.26.

  1. E6.1

    Algorithmic impact assessment

    Score 1 / 4

    Law 2024/017 mandates DPIAs for high-risk processing; no standalone AIA requirement

    Note: DPIA is a precursor; no explicit AIA requirement

    Sources africanlawbusiness.com (opens in a new tab)

  2. E6.2

    Bias audit requirements

    Score 0 / 4

    No bias audit requirements found

    Note: SNIA ethics references aspirational; no regulatory instrument

  3. E6.3

    Transparency obligations

    Score 1 / 4

    Law 2024/017 includes data subject rights and transparency for automated decisions

    Note: Data-law transparency only; sector-specific AI transparency rules absent

    Sources pollicy.medium.com (opens in a new tab)

  4. E6.4

    Citizen redress mechanism

    Score 1 / 4

    Law 2024/017 provides for ADCP complaint filing; courts available for data rights

    Note: DPA complaint route exists in law but ADCP not yet fully operational

    Sources techhiveadvisory.africa (opens in a new tab)

  5. E6.5

    Judicial AI remedy

    Score 1 / 4

    No documented AI-specific court cases or established jurisdiction; general civil courts available

    Note: Emerging stage only; legal system capable but untested on AI disputes

  6. E6.6

    AI advisory body diversity

    Score 1 / 4

    CONIA 2025 included diverse stakeholders; no formal standing AI advisory body with documented diversity criteria

    Note: Advisory body proposed under SNIA (Presidential Council); not yet established

    Sources theguardianpostcameroon.com (opens in a new tab)

  7. E6.7

    Global AI governance participation

    Score 2 / 4

    SNIA registered on OECD.AI policy tracker; Cameroon referenced in CIPESA continental AI governance report; GPAI engagement proposed in SNIA

    Note: Observer-level; active GPAI/OECD membership not confirmed

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  8. E6.8

    Civil society AI engagement

    Score 2 / 4

    CONIA 2025 formally included civil society and NGOs; Paradigm Initiative and CIPESA document Cameroon AI developments

    Note: Formal one-time consultation confirmed; ongoing mechanism not institutionalised

    Sources paradigmhq.org (opens in a new tab)

  9. E6.9

    African ethical framework reference

    Score 2 / 4

    SNIA states strategy is 'rooted in African cultural realities' and 'based on African values'

    Note: Substantive but not foundational integration; African values cited in strategy preamble

    Sources techparley.com (opens in a new tab)

  10. E6.10

    Youth participation

    Score 2 / 4

    CONIA 2025 included youth innovators and startup community; AYE-Data4Her and similar civil society organisations active in AI/data space

    Note: Youth consulted in strategy development; no standing advisory role confirmed

    Sources theguardianpostcameroon.com (opens in a new tab)

P7 · Weight 10% of composite

Regional Integration

1.30 / 4Emerging

Mean of all 10 indicator scores. Central Africa mean 1.34 · all 54 states mean 1.55.

  1. R7.1

    AU AI Strategy alignment

    Score 2 / 4

    SNIA references AU Agenda 2063; plans to represent Cameroon in AU AI Technical Committee forums; formal alignment process underway

    Note: Alignment process in SNIA; full alignment not independently verified through AU reporting

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  2. R7.2

    Kigali Declaration endorsement

    Score 3 / 4

    No confirmed Kigali Declaration endorsement found

    Note: Likely under consideration given SNIA regional cooperation pillar

    Scoring basis Official signatory list applied. Signatory of the Africa Declaration on AI (Kigali, 4 April 2025), C4IR list: "Endorsed" = 3.

    Sources c4ir.rw (opens in a new tab)

  3. R7.3

    REC AI governance coordination

    Score 2 / 4

    ECCAS 26th Summit (June 2025) attended by Cameroon's Minister of External Relations; SNIA proposes Central African Regional AI Network

    Note: Active ECCAS participation; dedicated AI coordination mechanism not yet operational

    Sources cameroon-tribune.cm (opens in a new tab)

  4. R7.4

    Cross-border AI agreements

    Score 1 / 4

    No bilateral or multilateral AI governance cooperation agreements confirmed; SNIA calls for international partnerships

    Note: Nascent; general digital cooperation agreements may exist

  5. R7.5

    Election integrity AI provisions

    Score 0 / 4

    No specific legal or institutional provisions on AI in elections found

    Note: CIPESA flags disinformation risks; no legislative response confirmed

  6. R7.6

    Disinformation response framework

    Score 1 / 4

    CIPESA 2025 documents Cameroon's disinformation risks; no formal government AI disinformation framework

    Note: Ad hoc at best; ANTIC has some cybercrime monitoring capacity

    Sources cipesa.org (opens in a new tab)

  7. R7.7

    AI election incidents documented

    Score 1 / 4

    No publicly documented AI-related election interference incidents for Cameroon

    Scoring basis Threshold applied. Raw value: 1 (rule band). Scored on documented institutional response, not incident count. Raw value read from the evidence: "No publicly documented AI-related election interference incidents for Cameroon" [incidents: 0; R7.6 ANTIC "some cybercrime monitoring capacity"]. Checked against the evidence on 7 October 2026: confirmed.

  8. R7.8

    Platform content moderation

    Score 1 / 4

    No formal government engagement with platforms on AI content moderation for Cameroonian context

    Note: CIPESA flags risks of opaque content moderation

    Sources cipesa.org (opens in a new tab)

  9. R7.9

    Geneva Dialogue participation

    Score 1 / 4

    No confirmed Cameroon delegation to UN Global AI Dialogue (July 2026)

    Note: Likely observer at best given nascent multilateral AI engagement

  10. R7.10

    G20/multilateral AI engagement

    Score 1 / 4

    Cameroon not a G20/BRICS member; SNIA references GPAI participation aspiration; OECD.AI hosts Cameroon's strategy

    Note: Observer-level; no confirmed active membership in major multilateral AI bodies

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

P8 · Weight 10% of composite

Implementation & Impact

0.80 / 4Nascent

Mean of all 10 indicator scores. Central Africa mean 0.60 · all 54 states mean 0.78.

  1. M8.1

    AI governance budget disbursed

    Score 1 / 4

    World Bank PATNUC funds agritech digital innovation (CFA40M per winner, 2026 edition); no ring-fenced AI governance budget figure

    Note: AI governance budget not disaggregated; finance flows primarily through World Bank/donor channels

    Scoring basis Fellow score kept; no raw value for the threshold.

    Sources businessincameroon.com (opens in a new tab)

  2. M8.2

    Health AI regulation

    Score 1 / 4

    No specific health AI regulation; Law 2022/008 on medical research touches health data; SNIA targets health as priority

    Note: Under discussion; no health AI-specific guidelines or legislation

    Sources datalaw.africa (opens in a new tab)

  3. M8.3

    Health AI devices approved

    Score 0 / 4

    No formal health AI device approval mechanism found

    Note: ML tools in use (e.g., TB diagnosis ML at Yaoundé Jamot Hospital) but no approval process

    Scoring basis Threshold applied. Raw value: 0 (authorised devices). Raw value read from the evidence: "ML tools in use (e.g., TB diagnosis ML at Yaoundé Jamot Hospital) but no approval process". Checked against the evidence on 7 October 2026: confirmed.

  4. M8.4

    Government AI system registry

    Score 0 / 4

    No registry of government AI systems in use found

    Note: SNIA's governance architecture would include this; not yet implemented

  5. M8.5

    AI governance M&E reports

    Score 0 / 4

    No published M&E report on AI governance implementation; SNIA adopted July 2025, too early for reporting cycle

    Note: First annual report expected no earlier than 2026–2027

    Scoring basis Threshold applied. Raw value: 0 (reports).

  6. M8.6

    Agriculture AI governance

    Score 2 / 4

    PATNUC agritech innovation challenge (2nd edition, 2026) provides government funding/oversight; Ndemri ML soil/plant health tool active in Far North

    Note: Active government programme; no formal agri-AI governance guidelines yet

    Sources businessincameroon.com (opens in a new tab)

  7. M8.7

    Financial services AI governance

    Score 1 / 4

    No AI-specific financial services regulation; COBAC operates regionally; fintech startups (CamPay, Diool) active

    Note: Under discussion regionally; no country-level provision confirmed

  8. M8.8

    Education AI governance

    Score 1 / 4

    SNIA references AI in education as priority sector; no education AI policy or guidelines adopted

    Note: Under discussion; reform planned but not yet adopted

    Sources nkafu.org (opens in a new tab)

  9. M8.9

    Measurable governance outcomes

    Score 1 / 4

    Early use cases: Ndemri agriculture, GOV-AI public administration tool, Giftedmom maternal health; no systematic governance evidence

    Note: Anecdotal/project-level evidence; no systematic government reporting

    Sources nkafu.org (opens in a new tab)

  10. M8.10

    WHO AI health guidance adoption

    Score 1 / 4

    No formal adoption of WHO Ethics and Governance of AI for Health guidance; awareness via UNDP AI training

    Note: Awareness stage only; no formal government adoption

    Sources undp.org (opens in a new tab)

Method

What is the Africa AI Governance Index?

The Africa AI Governance Index 2026 assesses 8 pillars of national AI governance. Each pillar is examined through 10 indicators. The Index is diagnostic. It measures formal governance instruments, not capability. Composite differences under about 0.1 are not meaningful.

Indicator score key

Indicator score key, 0 to 4
ScoreDefinition
0 No evidenceNo policy, institution, or activity. Confirmed absence.
1 NascentInitial discussion, concept note, informal working group.
2 DevelopingDraft policy, institution forming, pilot, or formal consultation.
3 EstablishedAdopted policy or operational institution; limited enforcement.
4 AdvancedFully operational with enforcement and measurable outcomes.

Maturity tiers

Applied to pillar and composite means.

Maturity tiers by score range
TierMean score
NascentBelow 1.00
Emerging1.00 to 1.99
Developing2.00 to 2.99
Established3.00 and above

How scores are built

A pillar score is the mean of the scored indicators in that pillar. Confirmed absence scores 0. An indicator where nothing could be determined is excluded from the pillar mean and reported as not scored. A score with no supporting evidence is excluded.

The composite is 15% of each of pillars P1 to P4 plus 10% of each of pillars P5 to P8, on a scale of 0 to 4. In other words, P1, P2, P3, P4 carry 15% each and P5, P6, P7, P8 carry 10% each.

Source: Africa AI Governance Index 2026 Final Dataset, 54 countries, built 6 October 2026. Lawyers Hub, Africa AI Policy Lab. Version 1.2, 7 October 2026.

Suggested citation

Lawyers Hub, Africa AI Policy Lab (2026). Country Profile on AI Governance: Cameroon. Africa AI Governance Index 2026, version 1.2, 7 October 2026. https://www.aipolicy.africa/country-profiles/cameroon