Africa AI Governance Index 2026 · Country profile on AI governance

Country Profile on AI Governance: Lesotho

Lesotho scores 1.48 out of 4 on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026. It sits in the Emerging tier and ranks 20 of 54 states.

Region
Southern Africa
Version
1.2 · 7 October 2026
Evidence reference date
30 June 2026
Overview

Lesotho at a glance

How to read this profile

Indicator evidence in this factsheet comes from desk research in October 2026. Fellows have not verified it and it did not inform the score.

The Index is diagnostic. It measures formal governance instruments, not capability. Composite differences under about 0.1 are not meaningful.

Country

Population (2024)
2.3 million
Region
Southern Africa
Regional economic communities
Southern African Development Community
Geography
Landlocked

Governance status

  • National AI strategy S1.1

    Draftnot scored

  • Data protection law G2.2

    Enactednot scored

  • AI regulatory body G2.5

    Not determinednot scored

  • Malabo Convention ratification G2.7

    Ratifiednot scored

  • Kigali Declaration endorsement R7.2

    Endorsednot scored

Headline assessment

Lesotho scores 1.48 out of 4 on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026. It sits in the Emerging tier and ranks 20 of 54 states. The eight pillar scores are fellow-assigned values from the Regional Summary. Indicators are not scored individually. The strongest pillar is Strategy & Vision (3.20). The weakest is Implementation & Impact (0.00). The Southern Africa mean is 1.49. The mean for all 54 states is 1.33.

Strongest pillar
Strategy & Vision3.20 / 4Established
Weakest pillar
Implementation & Impact0.00 / 4Nascent

Indicators scored: Pillar level only (fellow-assigned)

Pillar scores

Pillar scores at a glance

Each pillar is scored from 0 to 4. Lesotho's eight pillar scores are fellow-assigned values; indicators are not scored individually.

Bar chart of Lesotho's eight pillar scores out of 4, compared with the Southern Africa mean and the mean of all 54 states. The same figures are listed beside each bar and in the table below.
  • Lesotho score
  • Southern Africa mean
  • All 54 states mean
  1. P1Strategy & Vision
    3.20Established

    Southern Africa: 2.04
    All 54 states: 1.76

  2. P2Governance & Regulation
    0.80Nascent

    Southern Africa: 1.43
    All 54 states: 1.32

  3. P3Infrastructure & Data
    1.20Emerging

    Southern Africa: 1.77
    All 54 states: 1.51

  4. P4Human Capital
    1.60Emerging

    Southern Africa: 1.40
    All 54 states: 1.20

  5. P5Innovation & Ecosystem
    0.50Nascent

    Southern Africa: 1.16
    All 54 states: 1.05

  6. P6Ethics & Inclusion
    2.10Developing

    Southern Africa: 1.48
    All 54 states: 1.26

  7. P7Regional Integration
    2.00Developing

    Southern Africa: 1.62
    All 54 states: 1.55

  8. P8Implementation & Impact
    0.00Nascent

    Southern Africa: 0.70
    All 54 states: 0.78

  9. Composite (weighted)
    1.48Emerging

    Southern Africa: 1.49
    All 54 states: 1.33

View the pillar scores as a table
Lesotho pillar scores on the Africa AI Governance Index 2026
PillarBasisWeightScore (0–4)MaturitySouthern Africa meanAfrica mean
P1 Strategy & VisionFellow-assigned15%3.20Established2.041.76
P2 Governance & RegulationFellow-assigned15%0.80Nascent1.431.32
P3 Infrastructure & DataFellow-assigned15%1.20Emerging1.771.51
P4 Human CapitalFellow-assigned15%1.60Emerging1.401.20
P5 Innovation & EcosystemFellow-assigned10%0.50Nascent1.161.05
P6 Ethics & InclusionFellow-assigned10%2.10Developing1.481.26
P7 Regional IntegrationFellow-assigned10%2.00Developing1.621.55
P8 Implementation & ImpactFellow-assigned10%0.00Nascent0.700.78
Composite (weighted)—100%1.48Emerging1.491.33
Country report

What the scores say about Lesotho

Lesotho scores 1.48 out of 4 on the composite, which places it in the Emerging tier at rank 20 of 54. The eight pillar scores are fellow-assigned values from the Regional Summary, and the indicators are not scored. The composite sits level with the Southern Africa mean of 1.49 and above the Africa mean of 1.33. Strategy and Vision is the strongest pillar at 3.20 and Implementation and Impact is the weakest at 0.00. The profile pairs a high strategy score with no implementation score. The 3.20 for Strategy and Vision is retained but under second-edition review, because at 30 June 2026 the artificial intelligence policy had ministry approval only.

P1Strategy & Vision3.20 / 4Established

Strategy and Vision scores 3.20 (Established), a fellow-assigned value that is retained and under second-edition review: it implies an established strategy, and at 30 June 2026 the policy had ministry approval only (S1.1). Desk research in October 2026 found an Artificial Intelligence Policy and Implementation Plan from MICSTI, still marked 'Second Draft' in September 2026. The editor's check of 7 October 2026 records that the Ministry reported approving the policy on 20 February 2026. Cabinet adoption and gazettal are not confirmed (S1.2). The draft targets agriculture, health, education, employment and the public sector (S1.7) and sets actions and timelines for 2025 to 2030 (S1.8). A dedicated budget and a review mechanism were not determined (S1.4, S1.10).

See the 10 indicators for Strategy & Vision

P2Governance & Regulation0.80 / 4Nascent

Governance and Regulation scores 0.80 (Nascent), a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found that the Data Protection Act, 2011 became law when it was gazetted as Act No. 5 of 2012 (G2.2). On 21 April 2026 the ministry's Chief Legal Officer said the Data Protection Commission had not yet been established, a confirmed absence (G2.3, G2.4). The African Union status list dated 2 February 2026 records Malabo Convention signature on 30 November 2023, ratification on 5 February 2025 and deposit on 16 February 2025 (G2.7). The 2011 Act applies to foreign entities (G2.9). Artificial intelligence legislation, a regulatory body and enforcement actions were not determined (G2.1, G2.5, G2.8).

See the 10 indicators for Governance & Regulation

P3Infrastructure & Data1.20 / 4Emerging

Infrastructure and Data scores 1.20 (Emerging), a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found 3 data centre facilities listed in Data Center Map's Africa directory (I3.1). The Southern African Development Community ICT Observatory reports 2025 international bandwidth of 29.7 Gbps against lit capacity of 64 Gbps (I3.4). The Data Protection Act 2011 sets a two-tier regime for cross-border transfers (I3.8), and a blueprint for a proposed national data centre is in development (I3.10). The research confirmed two absences: Lesotho is landlocked and has no submarine cable landing point (I3.3), and no hyperscaler region is located in the country (I3.5). Data centre power capacity and a data localisation mandate were not determined (I3.2, I3.7).

See the 10 indicators for Infrastructure & Data

P4Human Capital1.60 / 4Emerging

Human Capital scores 1.60 (Emerging), a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found evidence on 2 of the 10 indicators. The CSET Country Activity Tracker, via Our World in Data, counts 4 artificial intelligence scholarly publications for Lesotho in 2024 and 2 in 2023 (H4.4). Sesotho is supported in Meta NLLB-200 and in Google Translate (H4.10). The other 8 indicators were not determined. No source gave artificial intelligence researchers per million; a general figure of 32.2 research and development researchers per million people in 2023 is context only (H4.1). The research did not identify university programmes, a workforce training programme or a labour transition framework in the sources opened (H4.3, H4.7, H4.8).

See the 10 indicators for Human Capital

P5Innovation & Ecosystem0.50 / 4Nascent

Innovation and Ecosystem scores 0.50 (Nascent), a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found evidence on none of the 10 indicators. It confirmed one absence: the national standards body, LSQAS, exists as an ISO correspondent member, but Lesotho is absent from the participating and observing member lists of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42, and no national artificial intelligence committee was found (N5.8). The other 9 indicators were not determined. No company count was located (N5.1). Partech's 2025 report implies that Lesotho received less than US$50M in tech equity in 2025, with no country figure (N5.2). No regulatory sandbox, safety evaluation facility or ISO/IEC 42001 certification was identified in the sources opened (N5.4, N5.6, N5.7).

See the 10 indicators for Innovation & Ecosystem

P6Ethics & Inclusion2.10 / 4Developing

Ethics and Inclusion scores 2.10 (Developing), a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found that section 51 of the Data Protection Act 2011 bars decisions based solely on automated processing (E6.3) and that section 39 allows complaints to the Data Protection Commission. The Commission has not been established, so the complaint route is not operational (E6.4). More than 100 stakeholders took part in validating the policy in August 2026 (E6.8). A text search of the second-draft policy found no reference to Ubuntu, Botho or African ethical principles, a confirmed absence (E6.9). The draft proposes risk assessments and regular audits, but no such requirement is in force, and both indicators were not determined (E6.1, E6.2).

See the 10 indicators for Ethics & Inclusion

P7Regional Integration2.00 / 4Developing

Regional Integration scores 2.00 (Developing), a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found Lesotho on the official signatory list of the Africa Declaration on Artificial Intelligence, done at Kigali on 4 April 2025, with no national implementation step citing the Declaration (R7.1, R7.2). Lesotho delivered a national statement at the inaugural United Nations Global Dialogue on AI Governance in Geneva on 6 to 7 July 2026 (R7.9). The remaining indicators were not determined. The Southern African Development Community Secretariat is developing a Regional AI Strategy and Regulatory Framework, but no Lesotho-specific participation was documented (R7.3). No cross-border agreement, election provision or disinformation framework was found in the sources opened (R7.4, R7.5, R7.6).

See the 10 indicators for Regional Integration

P8Implementation & Impact0.00 / 4Nascent

Implementation and Impact scores 0.00 (Nascent), a fellow-assigned value. Desk research in October 2026 found evidence on none of the 10 indicators. It confirmed one absence: OECD.AI, updated 28 April 2026, records a monitoring and evaluation framework with targets for 2025 to 2030, and states that no formal evaluation has been conducted and no results are public (M8.5). The other 9 indicators were not determined. No budget is specified for the Artificial Intelligence Policy and Implementation Plan (M8.1). The policy targets health, agriculture and education, but no sector-specific regulation or guidance was found for any of them (M8.2, M8.6, M8.8). No government system registry and no documented protective outcome was found (M8.4, M8.9).

See the 10 indicators for Implementation & Impact

Indicator evidence

Evidence by pillar

Desk-research evidence for each indicator, with sources. Where an indicator is marked “Not determined”, the research could not establish a finding. The Index method excludes such indicators from scoring rather than scoring them as absent.

P1 · Weight 15% of composite

Strategy & Vision

3.20 / 4Established

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. Southern Africa mean 2.04 · all 54 states mean 1.76.

10 indicators: 7 evidence found, 0 confirmed absence, 3 not determined.

  1. S1.1

    National AI strategy existence

    Evidence found

    Draft: An 'Artificial Intelligence Policy and Implementation Plan' (MICSTI, 2025) is recorded by OECD.AI and was publicly presented in Aug 2025 with UNDP. A Sep 2026 legal analysis notes the publicly available policy and implementation plan remain marked 'Second Draft', with no source confirming formal adoption. In Aug 2026 the ministry convened 100+ stakeholders to validate the AI Policy and began a National AI Strategy.

    Second-edition review: The fellow-assigned P1 score of 3.20 implies an established strategy. At 30 June 2026 the policy had ministry approval only.

    Editor's note, 7 October 2026: Checked on 7 October 2026. The Ministry reported approving the policy on 20 February 2026. Cabinet adoption and gazettal are not confirmed. One report dates publication to 17 August 2026, after the evidence reference date.

    Sources lena.gov.ls (opens in a new tab)lexafrica.com (opens in a new tab)cadeproject.org (opens in a new tab)

  2. S1.2

    Strategy adoption date

    Evidence found

    N/A: No confirmed formal adoption date: the policy is described as 'Second Draft' (Sep 2026) and was under stakeholder validation in Aug 2026. One Aug 2026 secondary report gives an adoption date of 17 Aug 2026, but that is the workshop start date and is not corroborated.

    Sources lexafrica.com (opens in a new tab)itweb.africa (opens in a new tab)cadeproject.org (opens in a new tab)

  3. S1.3

    Political commitment signals

    Evidence found

    Formal statement: ICT Minister Nthati Moorosi convened a five-day workshop with the UN (Aug 2026) to validate the AI, Data Management and Broadband policies and start an AI Strategy and Data Centre Blueprint. Deputy PM Nthomeng Majara spoke on building national capabilities.

    Sources itweb.africa (opens in a new tab)cadeproject.org (opens in a new tab)

  4. S1.4

    Dedicated AI budget allocation

    Not determined

    No budget specified in the policy record or 2025-2026 coverage.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)itweb.africa (opens in a new tab)

  5. S1.5

    AU Continental AI Strategy alignment

    Not determined

    A Sep 2026 analysis references the AU Continental AI Strategy and Lesotho's UN engagement but gives no assessment of the policy's alignment. The policy lists 'promoting international alignment' as an objective.

    Sources lexafrica.com (opens in a new tab)oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  6. S1.6

    Multi-stakeholder consultation

    Evidence found

    Formal consultation: The Aug 2025 policy launch included a panel of government, private sector, academia, NGOs and youth ('whole of society'). In Aug 2026 more than 100 stakeholders took part in validating the AI Policy.

    Sources publiceyenews.com (opens in a new tab)itweb.africa (opens in a new tab)

  7. S1.7

    Sector prioritisation

    Evidence found

    Specific sectors with targets: The draft policy targets agriculture, health, education, employment and the public sector, with named use cases (predictive analytics and livestock management, diagnostics and telemedicine, adaptive learning, fraud detection).

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)publiceyenews.com (opens in a new tab)

  8. S1.8

    Implementation roadmap

    Evidence found

    Phased plan: The draft Implementation Plan sets actions (governance bodies, AI legislation, education integration, connectivity, sandboxes) with indicators, targets and timelines for 2025-2030. Status remains draft.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)lexafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

  9. S1.9

    Monitoring and evaluation framework

    Evidence found

    Planned: The draft policy defines an M&E framework with indicators, targets and timelines for 2025-2030; it is not operational because the policy is not adopted.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)lexafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

  10. S1.10

    Strategy review mechanism

    Not determined

    No built-in review mechanism identified in the policy record or coverage.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

P2 · Weight 15% of composite

Governance & Regulation

0.80 / 4Nascent

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. Southern Africa mean 1.43 · all 54 states mean 1.32.

10 indicators: 3 evidence found, 2 confirmed absence, 5 not determined.

  1. G2.1

    AI-specific legislation

    Not determined

    No AI-specific bill or law for Lesotho was identified in this review.

  2. G2.2

    Data protection law status

    Evidence found

    Enacted: The Data Protection Act, 2011 became law when it was gazetted as Act No. 5 of 2012. On 21 April 2026 the ministry's Chief Legal Officer said the Data Protection Commission responsible for enforcement has not yet been established, so implementation is only partial.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)lena.gov.ls (opens in a new tab)

  3. G2.3

    DPA AI mandate

    Confirmed absence

    No DPA: Lesotho's Ministry of ICT Chief Legal Officer stated on 21 April 2026 that the Data Protection Commission 'has not yet been established'.

    Sources lena.gov.ls (opens in a new tab)

  4. G2.4

    DPA staffing and budget

    Confirmed absence

    The Data Protection Commission had not been established as of 21 April 2026, so there are no DPA staff or budget figures. The Act provides for 6 commissioners with 5-year terms (dataprotection.africa, May 2022).

    Sources lena.gov.ls (opens in a new tab)dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)

  5. G2.5

    AI regulatory body existence

    Not determined

    No AI governance body or council for Lesotho was located in this review.

  6. G2.6

    Institutional design model

    Not determined

    No regulatory model for AI governance in Lesotho was identified, and the Data Protection Commission is not yet established (April 2026).

    Sources lena.gov.ls (opens in a new tab)

  7. G2.7

    Malabo Convention ratification

    Evidence found

    Ratified: The AU official status list dated 02/02/2026 records for Lesotho: signature on 30/11/2023, ratification/accession on 05/02/2025 and deposit on 16/02/2025. No evidence of a domestic implementation programme specific to the Convention was assessed, so 'Ratified' rather than 'Implementing' is recorded.

    Sources au.int (opens in a new tab)au.int (2) (opens in a new tab)

  8. G2.8

    Enforcement actions taken

    Not determined

    No AI-related enforcement action (investigation, fine or order concerning AI or automated processing) was located in this desk review (October 2026); absence is not confirmed because DPA decision registers were not accessible. No DPA exists to take data protection enforcement action (April 2026).

    Sources lena.gov.ls (opens in a new tab)

  9. G2.9

    Extraterritorial provisions

    Evidence found

    Partial coverage: dataprotection.africa (May 2022) records that the 2011 Act applies to foreign entities. No enforcing commission exists (April 2026), and no AI-specific extraterritorial clause was found.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)lena.gov.ls (opens in a new tab)

  10. G2.10

    IP framework for AI

    Not determined

    No evidence of a review of intellectual property legislation for AI-generated content was located in this desk review (October 2026); IP-specific searches could not be completed, so absence is not confirmed.

P3 · Weight 15% of composite

Infrastructure & Data

1.20 / 4Emerging

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. Southern Africa mean 1.77 · all 54 states mean 1.51.

10 indicators: 5 evidence found, 2 confirmed absence, 3 not determined.

  1. I3.1

    Data center count

    Evidence found

    Data Center Map's Africa directory (page undated; accessed 2026-10-06) lists 3 data centre facility(ies) in Lesotho, out of 261 listed across 43 African countries. The directory is self-reported by operators and may include some non-colocation facilities.

    Sources datacentermap.com (opens in a new tab)

  2. I3.2

    Data center capacity (MW)

    Not determined

    No dated, named source publishing total live data centre power capacity (MW) for Lesotho was found. Data Center Map's directory does not report MW, and the ResearchAndMarkets Africa portfolio (Mar 2025) does not disclose country breakdowns in its public release.

    Sources datacentermap.com (opens in a new tab)businesswire.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. I3.3

    Submarine cable landing points

    Confirmed absence

    Lesotho is landlocked; TeleGeography's global landing-point dataset (accessed 2026-10-06) contains no landing point in Lesotho. International connectivity is via terrestrial fibre to neighbouring coastal landing stations.

    Sources submarinecablemap.com (opens in a new tab)

  4. I3.4

    International bandwidth (Gbps)

    Evidence found

    SADC ICT Observatory (downloaded 2026-10-06) reports Lesotho's 2025 international internet bandwidth as 29,700 Mbit/s (29.7 Gbps), against lit/equipped capacity of 64,000 Mbit/s (64 Gbps).

    Sources ictobservatory.sadc.int (opens in a new tab)ictobservatory.sadc.int (2) (opens in a new tab)

  5. I3.5

    Hyperscaler presence

    Confirmed absence

    None: Official region lists checked on 2026-10-06 show no cloud region, availability zone or local/edge zone in Lesotho: AWS (Africa region Cape Town only; local zones Johannesburg and Nairobi), Azure (South Africa North/West only), Google Cloud (africa-south1 Johannesburg only), Oracle (Johannesburg and Casablanca live; Kenya coming soon) and Alibaba (no African region). Huawei Cloud's African regions are Johannesburg and Cairo (May 2024), but this rests on press coverage because Huawei's own region page could not be machine-read.

    Sources aws.amazon.com (opens in a new tab)aws.amazon.com (2) (opens in a new tab)learn.microsoft.com (opens in a new tab)

  6. I3.6

    GPU/HPC access

    Evidence found

    Limited (academic only): South Africa's CSIR (undated news item, accessed 2026-10-06) states that its Centre for High Performance Computing has redeployed retired supercomputer infrastructure to regional partner countries including Lesotho, under the SADC HPC capacity-building programme hosted at universities. No national AI compute facility or commercial GPU cloud in Lesotho was identified.

    Sources csir.co.za (opens in a new tab)

  7. I3.7

    Data localisation provisions

    Not determined

    The Data Protection Act 2011 (s.52) conditions transfers (DLA Piper, accessed 2026-10-06; CIPESA Nov 2022). No in-country storage mandate was verified in this pass.

    Sources dlapiperdataprotection.com (opens in a new tab)cipesa.org (opens in a new tab)

  8. I3.8

    Cross-border data flow framework

    Evidence found

    Comprehensive: DLA Piper Data Protection Laws of the World (accessed 2026-10-06): The Data Protection Act 2011 sets a two-tier regime: transfers to SADC states that have transposed SADC data protection requirements under defined conditions, and stricter adequacy conditions for other countries.

    Sources dlapiperdataprotection.com (opens in a new tab)

  9. I3.9

    Foreign AI surveillance spending

    Not determined

    Lesotho is not among the 11 countries mapped in IDS/ADRN's Smart City Surveillance in Africa (March 2026), and no other dated source documenting a contract value for foreign AI-enabled surveillance in Lesotho was opened in this pass.

    Sources ids.ac.uk (opens in a new tab)

  10. I3.10

    Sovereign cloud initiatives

    Evidence found

    Planned: CADE (Civil Society Alliances for Digital Empowerment, 21 Aug 2026) reports that Lesotho is developing a National AI Strategy and a Data Centre Blueprint to set out a roadmap, partnerships and implementation priorities for a proposed national data centre.

    Sources cadeproject.org (opens in a new tab)

P4 · Weight 15% of composite

Human Capital

1.60 / 4Emerging

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. Southern Africa mean 1.40 · all 54 states mean 1.20.

10 indicators: 2 evidence found, 0 confirmed absence, 8 not determined.

  1. H4.1

    AI researchers per million

    Not determined

    No consistent cross-country source of AI-specific researchers per million was found or could be queried for this country as of Oct 2026 (the planned OpenAlex author query was blocked by an API rate limit on 2026-10-06). Context only: UNESCO UIS via World Bank indicator SP.POP.SCIE.RD.P6 reports 32.2 total R&D researchers (all fields, FTE) per million people in 2023; this is not an AI-specific figure.

    Sources api.worldbank.org (opens in a new tab)

  2. H4.2

    DPA staff with AI competency

    Not determined

    No published source was found on the number of data protection authority staff with demonstrable AI technical skills as of Oct 2026; DPA annual reports were not located within the research budget of this pass.

  3. H4.3

    University AI programs

    Not determined

    No source counting universities with AI/ML degree programmes was opened for this country in this pass (Oct 2026); a national higher-education programme register or course-page review is needed.

  4. H4.4

    African-authored AI publications

    Evidence found

    CSET Country Activity Tracker (Merged Academic Corpus) via Our World in Data, series 'AI scholarly publications - Field: All', entity Lesotho (LSO), reference year 2024: 4 publications (2023: 2). Counts articles with at least one author at an institution in the country, English title/abstract only; dataset last updated 27 Apr 2026. OpenAlex could not be used because the API was rate-limited on 2026-10-06.

    Data note: CSET/OWID AI publications 2022–24: 1, 2, 4.

    Sources ourworldindata.org (opens in a new tab)ourworldindata.org (2) (opens in a new tab)

  5. H4.5

    AI patents filed

    Not determined

    No country-level count of AI-related domestic patent filings was retrieved as of Oct 2026. WIPO IP Statistics and national IP office data were not accessible in this pass, and no published AI-patent figure for this country was found.

  6. H4.6

    K-12 CS education

    Not determined

    No authoritative source on the status of K-12 computer science education was opened for this country in this pass (Oct 2026).

  7. H4.7

    AI workforce training programs

    Not determined

    No government-supported AI reskilling or upskilling programme was identified for this country in the sources opened in this pass (Oct 2026).

  8. H4.8

    Labour transition policy

    Not determined

    No government framework on AI and labour-market transition (adopted, draft or under discussion) was found for this country in the sources opened in this pass (Oct 2026).

  9. H4.9

    Informal economy AI assessment

    Not determined

    No government assessment of AI's impact on the informal economy was found for this country in the sources opened in this pass (Oct 2026).

  10. H4.10

    African language NLP coverage

    Evidence found

    Count of domestic non-European languages in Meta NLLB-200/FLORES-200 or Google Translate (Cloud Translation list accessed Oct 2026; Jun 2024 expansion), mapped by the researcher. Supported: Sesotho (NLLB sot_Latn; Google st).

    Sources raw.githubusercontent.com (opens in a new tab)cloud.google.com (opens in a new tab)blog.google (opens in a new tab)

P5 · Weight 10% of composite

Innovation & Ecosystem

0.50 / 4Nascent

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. Southern Africa mean 1.16 · all 54 states mean 1.05.

10 indicators: 0 evidence found, 1 confirmed absence, 9 not determined.

  1. N5.1

    AI companies count

    Not determined

    No AI company count found; the TechBehemoths AI directory page for this country was not retrievable in this pass and no other directory count was located.

  2. N5.2

    Private AI investment (USD)

    Not determined

    Partech's 2025 report (22 Jan 2026) states that outside the top four markets only Senegal, Morocco and Ghana exceeded US$50M in tech equity, so Lesotho received less than US$50M in 2025; no country figure and no AI-specific investment figure was found.

    Sources partechpartners.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. N5.3

    AI incubators/accelerators

    Not determined

    No AI-focused incubator or accelerator count established from an opened source in this pass (general tech hubs not counted).

  4. N5.4

    Regulatory sandbox (AI)

    Not determined

    No fintech or other regulatory sandbox for this country appears in the Open Bank Project Africa sandbox list (updated to early 2026). No AI-specific sandbox was identified; the Datasphere Initiative 2025 inventory found AI-specific sandboxes in Africa still nascent.

    Sources openbankproject.com (opens in a new tab)thedatasphere.org (opens in a new tab)

  5. N5.5

    Government AI procurement

    Not determined

    No evidence located on government procurement of AI from domestic developers (no AI-specific procurement rule or preference policy found in sources opened).

  6. N5.6

    AI safety evaluation capacity

    Not determined

    No AI safety testing or evaluation facility (academic, government or accredited) identified in sources opened.

  7. N5.7

    ISO/IEC 42001 adoption

    Not determined

    No ISO/IEC 42001 certification of an organisation based in this country and no national adoption of the standard was found (searches Oct 2026); the national standards body is not a member of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42, the committee that publishes ISO/IEC 42001.

    Sources iso.org (opens in a new tab)

  8. N5.8

    Standards body AI competency

    Confirmed absence

    Exists, no AI focus: National standards body LSQAS (ISO correspondent member) exists, but Lesotho is absent from both the participating and observing member lists of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 (Artificial intelligence) as of Oct 2026, so there is no AI committee participation; no national AI committee was found.

    Sources iso.org (opens in a new tab)en.wikipedia.org (opens in a new tab)

  9. N5.9

    AI risk assessment frameworks

    Not determined

    No sector-specific or cross-sector AI risk assessment framework identified in sources opened.

  10. N5.10

    University-industry AI partnerships

    Not determined

    No formal university-industry AI research partnership identified in sources opened.

P6 · Weight 10% of composite

Ethics & Inclusion

2.10 / 4Developing

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. Southern Africa mean 1.48 · all 54 states mean 1.26.

10 indicators: 4 evidence found, 1 confirmed absence, 5 not determined.

  1. E6.1

    Algorithmic impact assessment

    Not determined

    The AI Policy and Implementation Plan (second draft, not adopted) proposes to mandate risk assessment and mitigation protocols for high-risk AI systems in healthcare, finance and public safety. GIRAI 2026 scores Lesotho 12.1 on impact assessments from one framework; with the draft unadopted and the Data Protection Commission not established (Apr 2026), no requirement is in force, but absence of any sectoral rule was not confirmed.

    Sources api.oecdai.org (opens in a new tab)global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)

  2. E6.2

    Bias audit requirements

    Not determined

    The second-draft AI Policy and Implementation Plan proposes requiring organisations to conduct regular audits of AI systems and to run bias-mitigation programmes, but the policy was not adopted as of Sep 2026. GIRAI 2026 scores Lesotho 22.7 on fairness and non-discrimination; no audit requirement in force was found.

    Sources api.oecdai.org (opens in a new tab)global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)

  3. E6.3

    Transparency obligations

    Evidence found

    Sector-specific: Section 51 of the Data Protection Act 2011 bars decisions based solely on automated processing, but the enforcing Commission has not been established (Apr 2026). GIRAI 2026 scores transparency and explainability at 12.1 from one framework document; the AI Policy is still a draft.

    Sources lesotholii.org (opens in a new tab)lena.gov.ls (opens in a new tab)global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)

  4. E6.4

    Citizen redress mechanism

    Evidence found

    No mechanism: Section 51 of the Data Protection Act 2011 (Act No. 5 of 2012) prohibits decisions with legal or significant effect based solely on automated processing, and section 39 allows complaints to the Data Protection Commission. However, on 21 Apr 2026 the ICT ministry's Chief Legal Officer stated that the Commission 'has not yet been established', so the statutory complaint route is not operational.

    Sources lesotholii.org (opens in a new tab)lena.gov.ls (opens in a new tab)dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)

  5. E6.5

    Judicial AI remedy

    Not determined

    No court case on algorithms, AI or solely automated decisions was found for Lesotho in sources opened as of Oct 2026 (data protection trackers, GIRAI 2026 access-to-redress indicator); ordinary courts have general jurisdiction, but the absence of precedent is not confirmed by an authoritative source.

    Sources dataprotection.africa (opens in a new tab)global-index.ai (opens in a new tab)

  6. E6.6

    AI advisory body diversity

    Not determined

    The second-draft AI Policy proposes a three-tier governance setup including a Data and AI Committee as a multi-stakeholder advisory platform with government, academia, industry, civil society and other sectors, meeting twice a year (OECD.AI record, Apr 2026). It is not reported as constituted, and the policy is unadopted.

    Sources api.oecdai.org (opens in a new tab)oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  7. E6.7

    Global AI governance participation

    Evidence found

    Observer: Lesotho is a UNESCO Member State; the Recommendation on the Ethics of AI was adopted unanimously by all 193 Member States in 2021 (as restated in Sep 2025 reporting). Lesotho is not on the Paris AI Action Summit statement (11 Feb 2025), the initial New Delhi AI Impact Summit Declaration endorser list (20 Feb 2026) or the OECD.AI GPAI member list, and no completed UNESCO RAM was found in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

    Sources middleeastainews.com (opens in a new tab)elysee.fr (opens in a new tab)digitalpolicyalert.org (opens in a new tab)

  8. E6.8

    Civil society AI engagement

    Evidence found

    Ad hoc consultation: The Aug 2025 presentation of the AI policy was framed as a 'whole of society' approach (Public Eye), and in Aug 2026 more than 100 stakeholders took part in validating the AI Policy (ITWeb). The draft policy's proposed Data and AI Committee with civil society representatives does not yet exist.

    Sources publiceyenews.com (opens in a new tab)itweb.africa (opens in a new tab)api.oecdai.org (opens in a new tab)

  9. E6.9

    African ethical framework reference

    Confirmed absence

    No reference: A text search of the second-draft AI Policy and Implementation Plan found no reference to Ubuntu, Botho (other than Botho University) or African ethical principles; its ethics language uses fairness, transparency, accountability and human rights.

    Sources api.oecdai.org (opens in a new tab)

  10. E6.10

    Youth participation

    Not determined

    A text search of the second-draft AI Policy and Implementation Plan found no youth-specific governance mechanism; the Aug 2025 policy presentation was described as a 'whole of society' approach (Public Eye), without a youth role being specified in the page opened.

    Sources api.oecdai.org (opens in a new tab)publiceyenews.com (opens in a new tab)

P7 · Weight 10% of composite

Regional Integration

2.00 / 4Developing

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. Southern Africa mean 1.62 · all 54 states mean 1.55.

10 indicators: 3 evidence found, 0 confirmed absence, 7 not determined.

  1. R7.1

    AU AI Strategy alignment

    Evidence found

    Awareness: Lesotho is a signatory of the Africa Declaration on AI (Kigali, 4 April 2025), which in clause 3.6.1 commits signatories to support national AI policies and governance frameworks aligned with the AU Continental AI Strategy; no country-specific formal alignment process was found in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

    Sources c4ir.rw (opens in a new tab)

  2. R7.2

    Kigali Declaration endorsement

    Evidence found

    Endorsed: Lesotho appears on the official signatory list of the Africa Declaration on Artificial Intelligence, done at Kigali on 4 April 2025 (C4IR Rwanda PDF created 5 April 2025; list of AU, Smart Africa and 52 states). No evidence of a national implementation step specifically citing the Declaration was found as of Oct 2026.

    Sources c4ir.rw (opens in a new tab)aiexpoafrica.com (opens in a new tab)

  3. R7.3

    REC AI governance coordination

    Not determined

    Lesotho is a member of SADC (founding 1980). SADC ministers (Bulawayo, 22-26 June 2026) discussed responsible AI adoption in infrastructure and the SADC Secretariat is developing a Regional AI Strategy and Regulatory Framework, but no Lesotho-specific participation in REC AI coordination was documented in sources opened.

    Sources en.wikipedia.org (opens in a new tab)sadc.int (opens in a new tab)itweb.africa (opens in a new tab)

  4. R7.4

    Cross-border AI agreements

    Not determined

    No bilateral or multilateral AI governance cooperation agreement involving Lesotho was found in sources opened as of Oct 2026; non-binding declarations (Kigali 2025 and, where applicable, Paris 2025 or New Delhi 2026) are recorded under R7.2 and R7.10.

  5. R7.5

    Election integrity AI provisions

    Not determined

    No legal or institutional provision addressing AI in elections was found for Lesotho in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

  6. R7.6

    Disinformation response framework

    Not determined

    No government framework for responding to AI-generated disinformation was found for Lesotho in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

  7. R7.7

    AI election incidents documented

    Not determined

    No documented AI-related election interference incident was found for Lesotho in sources opened (search coverage incomplete); count not determined as of Oct 2026.

  8. R7.8

    Platform content moderation

    Not determined

    No government engagement with platforms on AI content moderation was found for Lesotho in sources opened as of Oct 2026.

  9. R7.9

    Geneva Dialogue participation

    Evidence found

    Active contributor: Lesotho delivered a national statement at the inaugural UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance (Geneva, 6-7 July 2026), per the UN list of statements from Member States and Observers.

    Sources un.org (opens in a new tab)un.org (2) (opens in a new tab)

  10. R7.10

    G20/multilateral AI engagement

    Not determined

    Lesotho is not on the Paris AI Action Summit statement signatory list (Feb 2025), the initial New Delhi AI Impact Summit Declaration endorser list (87 states, 20 Feb 2026; later joiners not fully listed) or the G20 Johannesburg 2025 invited-states list. No other multilateral AI initiative participation was found.

    Sources elysee.fr (opens in a new tab)digitalpolicyalert.org (opens in a new tab)en.wikipedia.org (opens in a new tab)

P8 · Weight 10% of composite

Implementation & Impact

0.00 / 4Nascent

Fellow-assigned pillar score. Indicators not scored. Southern Africa mean 0.70 · all 54 states mean 0.78.

10 indicators: 0 evidence found, 1 confirmed absence, 9 not determined.

  1. M8.1

    AI governance budget disbursed

    Not determined

    No budget is specified for the AI Policy and Implementation Plan (MICSTI). The policy was finalised on 17 Aug 2026, followed by a strategy and data-centre blueprint workshop on 17-21 Aug 2026.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)cadeproject.org (opens in a new tab)

  2. M8.2

    Health AI regulation

    Not determined

    The AI Policy targets health among five sectors, but no health-specific AI regulation was found.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  3. M8.3

    Health AI devices approved

    Not determined

    No data was found on approved AI health devices.

  4. M8.4

    Government AI system registry

    Not determined

    No government AI registry was found.

    Sources cadeproject.org (opens in a new tab)

  5. M8.5

    AI governance M&E reports

    Confirmed absence

    OECD.AI (updated 28 Apr 2026) records an M&E framework with indicators and targets for 2025-2030, but states that no formal evaluation has been conducted and no results are public.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  6. M8.6

    Agriculture AI governance

    Not determined

    The AI Policy targets agriculture, but no agriculture-specific AI governance provisions were found.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  7. M8.7

    Financial services AI governance

    Not determined

    No Central Bank of Lesotho AI guidance was found; finance is not among the AI Policy's listed target sectors.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  8. M8.8

    Education AI governance

    Not determined

    The AI Policy targets education, but no education-ministry AI guidance was found.

    Sources oecd.ai (opens in a new tab)

  9. M8.9

    Measurable governance outcomes

    Not determined

    No documented protective outcome was found.

  10. M8.10

    WHO AI health guidance adoption

    Not determined

    No country-specific adoption was found. WHO AFRO AI-for-health ethics workshops (2021, 47 countries; July 2023) do not list participants.

    Sources afro.who.int (opens in a new tab)

Method

What is the Africa AI Governance Index?

The Africa AI Governance Index 2026 assesses 8 pillars of national AI governance. Each pillar is examined through 10 indicators. The Index is diagnostic. It measures formal governance instruments, not capability. Composite differences under about 0.1 are not meaningful.

Indicator score key

Indicator score key, 0 to 4
ScoreDefinition
0 No evidenceNo policy, institution, or activity. Confirmed absence.
1 NascentInitial discussion, concept note, informal working group.
2 DevelopingDraft policy, institution forming, pilot, or formal consultation.
3 EstablishedAdopted policy or operational institution; limited enforcement.
4 AdvancedFully operational with enforcement and measurable outcomes.

Maturity tiers

Applied to pillar and composite means.

Maturity tiers by score range
TierMean score
NascentBelow 1.00
Emerging1.00 to 1.99
Developing2.00 to 2.99
Established3.00 and above

How scores are built

A pillar score is the mean of the scored indicators in that pillar. Confirmed absence scores 0. An indicator where nothing could be determined is excluded from the pillar mean and reported as not scored. A score with no supporting evidence is excluded.

The composite is 15% of each of pillars P1 to P4 plus 10% of each of pillars P5 to P8, on a scale of 0 to 4. In other words, P1, P2, P3, P4 carry 15% each and P5, P6, P7, P8 carry 10% each.

Source: Africa AI Governance Index 2026 Final Dataset, 54 countries, built 6 October 2026. Lawyers Hub, Africa AI Policy Lab. Version 1.2, 7 October 2026.

Suggested citation

Lawyers Hub, Africa AI Policy Lab (2026). Country Profile on AI Governance: Lesotho. Africa AI Governance Index 2026, version 1.2, 7 October 2026. https://www.aipolicy.africa/country-profiles/lesotho